Fallout New Vegas patch, kinda funny.

Recommended Videos
Sep 14, 2009
9,073
0
0
Gethsemani said:
y1fella said:
I like New Vegas allot. But i find it quite funny and ironic that Bethesda is making a Patch for Obsidian's game.
Most people will agree that Bethesda puts a massive amount of effort into it's games. But it's funny to me that they're doing it for someone else. I guess it reflects on them in the end and this will just help profit them. But it makes me laugh anyway.
How do you feel about this patch? I personally welcome it. Anything to get rid of Obsidians' endless bugs.[/this. people

Actually, it makes perfect sense when you consider that Obsidian was just the company that won the outsourcing of the Fallout IP for a stand-alone game using the Fallout3 engine. Obsidian wins because they don't have to employ an entire QA/Troubleshooting division (Like ZeniMax/Bethesda does) and Bethesda wins because as the producers they get a large share of the profits and only have to provide as much support as they feel. It also makes sense since Bethesda is the company that built the Fallout 3-version of the Gamebryo engine and has already done patching and DLC-additions to it. Their troubleshooting and bug-fixing staff has plenty of experience doing it, whereas Obsidian's would have none.
this. i have never seen more trolling in my life, it seems people are just purposely trying to find things to absolutely hate obsidian for. Bethesda SHOULD be the one doing patches, its only going to increase the hell out of their profits, and like you said, they have the most experience with it.

new vegas is a damn good game, much much much better than fallout 3 in every way, imo, and i have yet to encounter any game breaking bugs, the only one i have found in nearly 8-9 hours of play is a fire ant stuck in the ant hill, otherwise it was hilarious
 

instantbenz

Pixel Pusher
Mar 25, 2009
744
0
0
Corpse XxX said:
Im so insecure as to wether i shall buy this on pc or ps3... What you guys think? Any experiences on the matter?
Go PC ... it's on the steam network and the community is strong that complaints are heard and dealt with more rapidly than on either console.

On subject, I think it is funny how companies will cover their tracks in this way, but really who doesn't want to look good in the gaming industry? Also, I'm just happy I didn't spring for it with the lag I've seen, the tiny map and the ps3 hard drive killing!?!?! I don't have complete confirmation on the game mucking with hard drive data, but it's one of those things floating around my gaming friends. True or not, it's too risky for me yet.
 

Flamezdudes

New member
Aug 27, 2009
3,696
0
0
[zonking great said:
]I'm unsure why a small graphical glitch like the one I saw in the character creation screen is a reason to burn it down to the ground...
You think that is the worst of it?

A very large amount of people get constant crashes, glitched and unplayable saves and tons more. I'm on the edge about buying it myself...
 

y1fella

New member
Jul 29, 2009
748
0
0
Max Royden said:
It cannot be mega-buggy can it, the last thing I want is to waste money on a game that crashes all the time.
Don't worry Bethesda is making a patch to fix that.
 

mjc0961

YOU'RE a pie chart.
Nov 30, 2009
3,847
0
0
y1fella said:
I like New Vegas allot. But i find it quite funny and ironic that Bethesda is making a Patch for Obsidian's game.
Most people will agree that Bethesda puts a massive amount of effort into it's games. But it's funny to me that they're doing it for someone else. I guess it reflects on them in the end and this will just help profit them. But it makes me laugh anyway.
How do you feel about this patch? I personally welcome it. Anything to get rid of Obsidians' endless bugs.
Well to be fair, aren't a lot of the bugs the same bugs that were in Fallout 3, making them Bethesda's bugs in the first place? Sure there obviously should have been more effort by both parties to fix some of them BEFORE release, but I don't see Bethesda making a patch as cleaning up Obsidian's mess, I see it as them fixing up their own mess.

Mimsofthedawg said:
Oh, and PS3. PS3's seem to run the game better.
After playing Fallout 3 on the PS3, I have a very hard time believing that.
 

y1fella

New member
Jul 29, 2009
748
0
0
Hyper-space said:
Steampunkelephant said:
I ran into one bug so far (Payed for 4 hours) and it was a simple radscorpion stuck in the ground. I don't see what all the fuss is about.
They said the same thing about Fallout 3 "its too buggy, there are game-breaking buggs" and guess what? i had no problems with Fallout 3, only encountering minor buggs (like you said, enemy stuck in the ground).
That's because it was a review copy. Game reviewers in order to get the review out sooner get sent review copy's which are often a lot more buggy and less polished. Don't get me wrong i found the game buggy but it's not nearly as buggy as it would seem.
 

y1fella

New member
Jul 29, 2009
748
0
0
ZahrDalsk said:
y1fella said:
Most people will agree that Bethesda puts a massive amount of effort into it's games.
No... the last thing Bethesda put effort into was Bloodmoon. Everything after that has just been lazy and shoddy.
Look. I like Bethesda. You apparently don't. That's the thing about opinions. They're different.
 

Top35

New member
Apr 14, 2010
87
0
0
All I have to say is even though I've run across a bug or two, the things that they got right (iron sight aiming, weapon mods, etc.) vastly outweigh anything I could think to gripe about.
 

Merkavar

New member
Aug 21, 2010
2,429
0
0
i avent noticed a single bug in fallout new vegas on pc. unless you count me being awesome and punching praying mantises in the face a bug.
 

BrEnNo1023

New member
Mar 18, 2009
203
0
0
Corpse XxX said:
Im so insecure as to wether i shall buy this on pc or ps3... What you guys think? Any experiences on the matter?
I went PC, simply because I hate the way consoles' low resolution is upscaled onto my TV's native 1080p, therefore making everything horribly pixelly and jagged (AKA sans anti-aliasing). So I'd get it on PC to enjoy a smooth framerate and smooth true full-HD images.

However i played fallout 3 on xbox 360 and the way that the controls are configured for the two consoles is SO GOOD, so it's a toss up: assigning actions to keys as best you can on PC -vs- intuitive controller buttons on console || great graphics on PC -vs- substandard, downscaled console graphics on console.

Really, either is as good as the other, it doesn't matter. I got it for PC also because it was cheaper at the online store I visited :p
 

Jandau

Smug Platypus
Dec 19, 2008
5,034
0
0
y1fella said:
I like New Vegas allot. But i find it quite funny and ironic that Bethesda is making a Patch for Obsidian's game.
Most people will agree that Bethesda puts a massive amount of effort into it's games. But it's funny to me that they're doing it for someone else. I guess it reflects on them in the end and this will just help profit them. But it makes me laugh anyway.
How do you feel about this patch? I personally welcome it. Anything to get rid of Obsidians' endless bugs.
Considering that many of the bugs in the game are confirmed to be a result of Bethesda's own bugged engine, I'm honestly not too suprised. Bethesda doesn't have a very good track record when it comes to bugs. Granted, obsidian is generally even worse, but laying the blame for the whole thing squarely on their shoulders isn't fair. Bethesda gets to share the blame because the resources Obsidian had to work with were bugged to begin with.
 

y1fella

New member
Jul 29, 2009
748
0
0
Top35 said:
All I have to say is even though I've run across a bug or two, the things that they got right (iron sight aiming, weapon mods, etc.) vastly outweigh anything I could think to gripe about.
I concur!