defiante1 said:
Ok, Fallout New Vegas has been out for a while and everyone seems to love it. My question is why ? People seem to be running around blinded by nostalgia about Fallout games, ignoring its many and obvious faults.
The game itself is only 6GB's which is half the size of Fallout 3. The game is essentially one big copy and paste, many of the textures and and environments reused. The vault you find in New Vegas is such a clear copy and paste its laughable and the world is tiny, and not even a sandbox.
I know its all open free... technically but the game controls where you go by having immensely overpowered mobs herding your movements. So you can really only take one path throughout the wastelands. Its really linear gameplay, any attempt to break out and go on your own usually bugs the main quest which is also, very easy to do. The game punishes you for taking choices it doesn't approve off or heading in directions it doesn't like. A friend of mine managed to sneak past the Deathclaws and make it to New Vegas early on. Only to have the main quest instantly update to catch up, skipping 50% of the content and then crashing.
Speaking of broken quests, the game is laughably buggy, to the point where its almost unplayable if you don't heavily mod and patch it. Huge amounts of crashes and bugs that break any real immersion. The quest themselves ant much better, one you remove all the "Go to A and talk to B" quests there are less than probably 10 proper side quests with any real detail. About the same total quests as Fallout 3 had in Megaton.
The game reeks of expansion pack material padded out to be resold as a full price game, this wouldn't be too bad if people weren't eating up with their "I <3 Fallout" glasses on. The series was great yes but this is a sad and shallow addition too it which uses humor to hide its failings. Even the humor itself is weak with often no attempt to fit them in with context. "A supermutant with a wig... yeah sounds awesome, throw it in. Or I know! Ghoul space explorers!" Being thrown in because of the lols, even breaking some established ideas to do so. Like Glowing One ghouls no longer doing radiation damage.
People should try and judge these games that piggyback off previous success's without the rose tinted view or the love for the series blinding their judgement. Take off the fallout 3 label and call it "Wasteland Tales" and then this game wouldn't of even made it past launch.
Anyway, rant over.
You have to judge a game based on the game itself... I agree...
Don't judge the game based on its potential to be an expansion pack... Otherwise you are saying that Halo: Reach, ODST, Gears 2 and 3, Red Dead Redemption, and any other game that shares an IP and an engine (or even just an engine) are bad games.
New Vegas was good... It just had a lot of bugs.
EDIT: Also, stinkychops...
Chill the fuck out... No one cares how deep or "thought provoking" you think you are, you are just a troll...
You may not even know that you are trolling, but when you start making a huge issue out of absolutely nothing (not to mention being a pretentious douche in the process) you are, in fact, trolling.
Literally nothing you said for a multitude of posts actually contributed to the thread.
Also, you were even presented the opportunity to take the mature route and agree to disagree, but instead you had to push the issue and continue your off topic aspersion and slander.
EDIT: I could also rip apart your laissez-faire approach to grammar in a few of your posts, but some of us are actually aware that a few grammatical errors do not define a person.