ks1234 said:
5t3v0 said:
ks1234 said:
Fallout 3 is the best title in the series. So many people complain about it but I seriously think it was the best game in the entire series... Damn "ruining the lore" or the story, etc. etc.
You better be trolling...
Not even a little bit
*Insert rage post about you not knowing what is truly garbage... etc. In full capitals with lots of explicit language*
WARNING! TL; DR AHEAD
But seriously, Fallout 3 wasn't. It was poorly written and poorly balanced. The Poorly written part Isn't even complaint about the lore breakages (Though I have MANY of those), its just clichéd, predictable and restrictive with no real freedom apart from choosing to do nothing or unwittingly poison the wasteland because some computer told you that the virus you were inserting was beneficial. Its also senseless, why, if you follow the quest line with bad karma due to you doing things like blowing up megaton, selling a kid off to slavery, etc. Do you still follow what your dad wanted you to do? I mean sure, he is your father, but if you were that much of a dick your dad would probably be the next on your list of people to kill and/or maim. And the NPC's. Paper cutouts if they were anything. Fawkes was the only follower to have any substance, but even then that was lost on me, Everyone else had 5 seconds of backstory before they just faded into a (semi) friendly raider, a BoS paladin, a pissed off ghoul, a robot, and a slave with privelages. Though Moira Brown and some of the enclave were redeeming features to an otherwise bland cast
Obsidian Did a better job with New Vegas, bugs aside. Damage Threshold for armour had a much needed return, Weapons were expanded upon, Perks weren't chosen every level so you actually had to think about your choices and Enemies were actually challenging (see FNV Deathclaws, Cazadors and the BIGGER deathclaws)for a great deal. The writing actually allowed you for freedom and you didn't feel like you were on some sort of rail network. The characters were done nicely. Background characters and even offscreen characters had more substance than the Follower NPC's, take Randall Clark (the survivalist) from Honest Hearts for example, The Follower NPC's were done nicely in that regard as well. Its funny. Extra credits talked badly about Fallout New Vegas, but it fit in more with the content they talked about in other episodes than Fallout 3 did, such as the inclusion of non-stereotypical Homosexual characters (Arcade ganon and Veronica), and choices having a true effect.
But no. Fallout New Vegas fell into the pit of "Its just like Fallout 3, But shit because its not bethesda" Fan Dumb. it didn't help that Bethesda rushed it out the door last year as well.
Another thing. while I have beef with Fallout 3, I do love it. It was my first Fallout game, and through it and the fallout wiki, I discovered the entire franchise. Its just now I have new Vegas, its needless to me, as New Vegas fits in with both lore and accessible gameplay for a young mind like mine.