I would like to see a Fallout movie. But not one that follows the actual games storyline. More of the background leading up to the bombs and then leads to the games start? And keep Uwe Boll AWAY from the script, he could butcher The Godfather 3.
Oh, so you're one of those people who thinks that FO3 ruined the franchise?Silver said:No. Sure, it has potential, but everything has potential. The movie industry is so full of idiotic bigots though, that any attempt to make it into a movie now would probably be based on the third game, and an even bigger insult to the series than that one. It would probably be cutened up as well, to allow for more income from children watching it.
Me too!C Lion said:It'd be a good movie if they made it about the first one. The third one's ending was just shit.
If they made an anime Fallout movie I will go on a killing spree in protest.DonPauliani said:T.H.O.R said:Well, maybe some well-to-do japanese anime something-or-another (I don't know what their fancy titles are) will pick it up and CG the bejeezus out of it.
Not all videogame movies need to be Live action...
damned right, mate.
The Van Buren storyline would definetely have made a better game and film. Even the start to the game would have been more exciting, busting out of prison, not knowing what the hell to do next.Silver said:It should be based on Van Buren in that case. That's the only way I see it happening well. Anyone who knows what Van Buren is would most likely be competent enough to make it well (if they had a budget, which I doubt they would), and they'd be totally flipping off Fallout 3 at the same time and that annoying overgrown child they have working on it.
Well, of course you would have. Anyone with any sense of taste and more experience in gaming than Oblivion, Halo and Fallout 3 would also have preferred Van Buren. It's a natural reaction to chose the better of two options.nova18 said:The Van Buren storyline would definetely have made a better game and film. Even the start to the game would have been more exciting, busting out of prison, not knowing what the hell to do next.Silver said:It should be based on Van Buren in that case. That's the only way I see it happening well. Anyone who knows what Van Buren is would most likely be competent enough to make it well (if they had a budget, which I doubt they would), and they'd be totally flipping off Fallout 3 at the same time and that annoying overgrown child they have working on it.
I would have preffered that game to the game they ended up releasing.
Okay that might work, but a movie?John Galt said:You know, it might actually work as a graphic novel. Think about it: it could take advantage of the awesome setting and art of Fallout, it wouldn't have the need to appeal to everyone, and...well, those are the only two reasons I can think of but they're damn fine reasons.
Super Mario Bros. is quite possibly the worst thing to ever come out of Hollywood. That shit scarred me for life.xenxander said:Those aside, "Tome Raider" wasn't 'that' bad and kept good with the concept well enough but who remembers "Super Mario Bros."? Probably no one - it wasn't a memorable movie even though it ran for 140mins... *smirks*
I'd say the movie was attempting to mix a part of "Mad Max: Beyond Thunderdome" with a little bit of "Thriller" (minus the music), but if you attempt to make some colorful "Mushroom Kingdom" I think it will only appeal to children and I can see the target audience was young boys (12 - 16) for the year it came out.Agayek said:Super Mario Bros. is quite possibly the worst thing to ever come out of Hollywood. That shit scarred me for life.xenxander said:Those aside, "Tome Raider" wasn't 'that' bad and kept good with the concept well enough but who remembers "Super Mario Bros."? Probably no one - it wasn't a memorable movie even though it ran for 140mins... *smirks*