Fan theories you firmly believe in

[WolfThomas]

I believe that the Dark Brotherhood are mislead in TES. Sithis/Padomay has nothing to do with them, he's too vast and void-like. Rather the Night Mother is just the daedra Mephala pretending to give his orders. It fits especially as the Dark Brotherhood formed as an offshoot of the Morag Tong when they stopped worshipping Mephala.

Spoiler: Anyways,

Why would death negate an oat.... wait! [/looks up the words of the nights watch oath] Okay, there's no "till death do us part" line in the oath, and as far as I can tell there is no mystical benefit or components to membership in the Nights Watch, so only people and yourself would care if you broke it. Even if in the minds of some people dying relieves you of previous oaths if you come back to life, most people in Westros wouldn't believe that Snow HAD died and come back to life. If he doesn't continue to follow his oath, he would receive the same response from most people regardless of his death/life status. Namely, if they care and they find out, they will try to execute him.

TL;DR The oath isn't magical, only people care if you break it.

Spoiler: Depends how you read it

Night gathers, and now my watch begins. It shall not end until my death. I shall take no wife, hold no lands, father no children. I shall wear no crowns and win no glory. I shall live and die at my post. I am the sword in the darkness. I am the watcher on the walls. I am the shield that guards the realms of men. I pledge my life and honor to the Night's Watch, for this night and all the nights to come

So the first bit I highlighted could be an argument for it being absolved by death, the second part is ambiguous and the last bit could go against it (depends if the mean ALL the nights as in the rest of time, or just all the night that a new nightswatchman would have in his future).

Now I don't think Jon Snow is going to get back up and give the Watch the finger as he swans off to become King. But if he did want to I think it's enough of a legal anomaly for him to get away with it. Jon was savvy enough to point out that they defend the realms of men, that wildlings are human and they should therefore help them

 

[Zen Toombs]

I believe that the Dark Brotherhood are mislead in TES. Sithis/Padomay has nothing to do with them, he's too vast and void-like. Rather the Night Mother is just the daedra Mephala pretending to give his orders. It fits especially as the Dark Brotherhood formed as an offshoot of the Morag Tong when they stopped worshipping Mephala.

Spoiler: Anyways,

Why would death negate an oat.... wait! [/looks up the words of the nights watch oath] Okay, there's no "till death do us part" line in the oath, and as far as I can tell there is no mystical benefit or components to membership in the Nights Watch, so only people and yourself would care if you broke it. Even if in the minds of some people dying relieves you of previous oaths if you come back to life, most people in Westros wouldn't believe that Snow HAD died and come back to life. If he doesn't continue to follow his oath, he would receive the same response from most people regardless of his death/life status. Namely, if they care and they find out, they will try to execute him.

TL;DR The oath isn't magical, only people care if you break it.

Spoiler: Depends how you read it

Night gathers, and now my watch begins. It shall not end until my death. I shall take no wife, hold no lands, father no children. I shall wear no crowns and win no glory. I shall live and die at my post. I am the sword in the darkness. I am the watcher on the walls. I am the shield that guards the realms of men. I pledge my life and honor to the Night's Watch, for this night and all the nights to come

So the first bit I highlighted could be an argument for it being absolved by death, the second part is ambiguous and the last bit could go against it (depends if the mean ALL the nights as in the rest of time, or just all the night that a new nightswatchman would have in his future).

Now I don't think Jon Snow is going to get back up and give the Watch the finger as he swans off to become King. But if he did want to I think it's enough of a legal anomaly for him to get away with it. Jon was savvy enough to point out that they defend the realms of men, that wildlings are human and they should therefore help them

Spoiler: Bravo!

Extremely well argued, and bonus points for highlighting and talking about all of the points both for and against your theory. I concede, on all but the last part of the oath. In my opinion the wording clearly says to me that the Nights Watch is an eternal vigil. I do understand where you could read it as "all nights to come until I die", but that reading requires interpreting the oath instead of taking the oath at its face.

Regardless of nitpicking though, I must say bravo.

 

[Treblaine]

What happened before A New Hope was absolutely NOTHING like the actual Prequel Trilogy films.

Clone Wars: a few rogue planets with hardly any resources invest heavily in clone technology and build a VAST army of clones and start slowly conquering the galaxy, using their clones who have no self-preservation only focus on the mission (suicide bombers, topical) and many can look like anyone which makes infiltration a huge problem. This challenges the Republic like never before and in an attack that destroys the democratic council allow Military rule to take over. Conscription is enacted as the only answer to the massive threat of the clone armies.

Clone war ends: ends with a planet that is impossible to subdue, somewhere on a massive planet clones keep being grown in vats. War ends when they find a way to destroy the entire planet, completely, even the deep mines that could be anywhere. This is a device set on the planet though it does set the seeds of the idea for a space station with a planet destroying laser, a death star.

Aftermath: cloning technology is verboten, no one uses it for anything for how it is tainted by association is with the Clone Wars, hence by why amputated limbs are replaced with robotics rather than cloned body parts or whole bodies. But clones completely disappear once the cloning vats were destroyed, no clone lives longer than 10 years the war quickly winds down though many parts of the galaxy the clones fight on fruitlessly.

Storm troopers: the war cost money and the conscription was unpopular so even once the clone war was long over the Storm-troopers remain shaking down the trooper-racket of getting new recruits and controlling more resources.

The Jedi are NOT a warrior class though some were fighters, they are a handful of them, priests that lead a dying religion as people can't get in touch with the force any more. They are not any kind of threat to the empire, they cannot fight entire armies or wars. They are more like wild west sheriffs or travelling judges, they go around forming posses and establishing courts, but if their religion is discredited then they are ignored. The Jedis weren't destroyed, they faded away... but the legend remained. Yoda was just one of many Jedi that went off to some far corner of the galaxy when they weren't wanted any more.

Anakin LITERALLY dies in combat, he is dead, but he is resurrected and rebuilt with machines by The Emperor, he is only able to keep living in a zombie cyborg state with The Emperor's power over the force prolonging his life. If Anakin defies the emperor he dooms himself. Darth Vader is a deep-cover personality that Anakin Skywalker adopts to infiltrate the Clone hierarchy. He goes a bit Jack Bauer, doing awful things as he sees it is necessary to stop worse things happening.

Palpatine persuades Anakin that only total obedience will work and put utter faith in the empire and the emperor. Part of bringing Anakin back from the dead fundamentally corrupts him, where he was bad but morally ambiguous before, now he is force choking anyone who stands in his way and running institutionalised abduction and torture programs. Young Anakin see him commanding and assertive yet still restrained, but suffer for his restraint.

 

[Jonluw]

Okay, here's the pitch:
The blades of a fan are all angled so that their cross-section is diagonal to the plane of rotation. When the blades then are set to rotate, they will need to push air out of their way in order to be able to rotate. The angling of the blades ensures that the air is pushed in a pre-determined direction instead of just randomly being shoved around.
Thus a wind is created, flowing out from the front of the fan.

 

[Ninja_daemon117]

Okay, here's the pitch:
The blades of a fan are all angled so that their cross-section is diagonal to the plane of rotation. When the blades then are set to rotate, they will need to push air out of their way in order to be able to rotate. The angling of the blades ensures that the air is pushed in a pre-determined direction instead of just randomly being shoved around.
Thus a wind is created, flowing out from the front of the fan.

Haha I can't believe it took so long for someone to make a pun.

As for the OP I like the James Bond theory.

 

[Flamezdudes]

Oh, such ripe pickings...

I tend to try and avoid fan theories (unless they're my own) because that is a long (short) slippery slope towards fan fic, and we all know to avoid that like the plague.

But just in relation to what has already been mentioned...

Spoiler: DKR

Its already been firmly established that Warners are rebooting Batman for Justice League, hasn't it? The Nolan-verse was already established as a trilogy when Batman Begins was so successful, so any speculation about it continuing is kinda moot. Sure, it'd be great to see a Batman/Nightwing combo (Robin is probably too colourful for the Nolan-verse), but as I say, Warners are all geared towards what will probably turn out to be an awful Justice League movie

Spoiler: Game of Thrones

while this theory is an interesting one, hasn't it been mentioned several times in the books that Jon looks an awful lot like Ned Stark? Thats one of the reasons that Cat hates him so much right? Also, in the books, all of their other children are redheads, right? Except Jon and Arya. If he really were Rhaegars son, he'd be silver haired, wouldn't he?

Spoiler: Mass Effect 3

I vehemently disbeleive the whole indoctrination theory thing, because too much of it is basically just grasping at straws from the evidence presented. Its like the movie Clue, and how it has three different endings which all work with the evidence presented. My main problem with it is that I just don't buy that the kid isn't real. Just because he's presented in a way that apparently only Shepard sees him? Nah, just don't buy it. And without that, the indoctrination theory falls apart.

I wholeheartedly agree with the James Bond one though. I mean, its the only way that Bond (movie Bond anyway) makes any sense.

A Song of Ice and Fire/Game of Thrones:

Spoiler

Arya is contantly referred to as being one of the few Stark children to looking very Stark - like and is also referred to as looking a lot like Lyanna, Ned's sister. Now, if Jon was a son of Rhaegar and Lyanna it would kinda make sense that he would look very Stark like, considering only he and Arya look like proper Stark's whilst the other children are very Tully looking.

Also, you don't always inherit your father's hair colour. I can't remember where in the ASOIAF history, but i'm pretty sure there are Targaryen's who don't have White silvery hair. Hell, just look at real life, it happens all the time.

Ikari Shinji is gay in the original Evangelion TV show

Unit 00's soul is Naoko Akagi's

Rebuild of The Evangelion is a sequel or

Spoiler

a possible world after third impact

RE-TAKE is canon

considering RE-TAKE is canon

Spoiler

I also like to believe Mari is Asuka's and Shinji's daughter from RE-TAKE

come at me

How could Re-Take possibly be canon? It's fan-faction.

And Rebuild being a sequel just can't make sense, how would events be occuring again but differently, with all the pieces in place again like Unit-01? (Even though it went off into space) I believe that Hideaki Anno is simply referencing back to things that us Eva fans will gush over.

And Unit-00's soul? - http://wiki.evageeks.org/Eva-00%27s_soul

And Shinji is not gay. He expresses interest in women and gets embarrassed at female sexuality (Asuka's thermal expansion topic), hell he even masturbates over her while she's in a coma. He was just simply embarrassed by Kaworu's display's of affection since nobody had ever really given him that kind of affection within his living memory.

Check mate.

 

[WanderingFool]

Outside of that particular fandom, I have suprisingly few. The most dominant theory I hold to is that Gordon Freeman is exactly how Ross Scott's machinima series Mind [http://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=ELkznu7Gec_hU] portrays him.

I like that theory...

That James Bond is a code name, not a person. Either '007' is used to distinguish James Bond from other codenamed agents, or MI-5 uses '007' because they had 6 agents die before the current string of successful agents. When one of these Bonds dies in the line of duty, they will use '008' to refer to him, and possibly give him a new name.

Its been said that James Bond is the person, not a code name. But I still refuse to believe that...

Also, that was what I was going to say, so ninja'd...

 

[nathan-dts]

Seriously, after playing the EC, I had no choice but to be completely satisfied with the changes because I fucking nailed each of the endings so accurately you might think I was a writer for Bioware. :3

I wouldn't put that on my resume...
I still believe the indoctrination theory completely. I mean the only problem is that it requires me to believe that Bioware would put that much effort in.

 

[ultrachicken]

Red Vs Blue.

Spoiler

Allison (The Woman Tex is based on) is Noble Six. Badass? check. Shot of destroyed helmet? check. Stopped right before she achieves her objective?.. Okay, Six got the Chief off the planet, but you could say surviving was her ultimate end-goal, which she did. Also, did I forget to mention badass?

Spoiler

What about the fact that the personalities don't match in the slightest? Tex is far more talkative, aggressive, and competitive than Noble Six, who was lethal where the Covenant were concerned but otherwise very quiet and co-operative. Also, both characters getting shot in the head doesn't count as evidence.

 

[Denamic]

Spoiler

Bruce really died in the explosion and Alfred seeing Bruce in Florence is just a hallucination, because Bruce faking his own death and moving to Florence just seems out of character.

Spoiler

He was probably just on vacation and granting Alfred his dream in return for all he's done. If he had just moved there, he wouldn't have fixed the bat signal, and the Robin thing wouldn't have made any sense. He'll still be Gotham's protector, only full-time and without having to worry about those close to him, I think. Also, he couldn't have 'hallucinated' the discovery that the auto-pilot had already been patched by himself after he's died.

 

[BelfastSpartan]

Anyway, when alfred saw bruce sitting at the table, selina was the woman he was sitting with, at no point during the film did alfred see selin, and if he had seen her he deffinitly never knew that bruce and her were interested in on another, so why imagine the two of them together

Possibly answered but I haven't gotten that far yet so if it has, I'm sorry.

Selina was the 'waitress' Alfred told to bring Bruce his food when he was locked away in the 'wing' at the start when she steals his mums necklace.

He then obviously finds out she's a jewel thief and Bruce takes an interest in her. Probably doesn't link them romantically at that point but it's not totally out of the question since Bruce goes to a lot of effort, which Alfred presumably knows about, to keep following her. Plus the possibility of conversations that may have happened not included in the movie.

 

[Canadamus Prime]

What happened before A New Hope was absolutely NOTHING like the actual Prequel Trilogy films.

Clone Wars: a few rogue planets with hardly any resources invest heavily in clone technology and build a VAST army of clones and start slowly conquering the galaxy, using their clones who have no self-preservation only focus on the mission (suicide bombers, topical) and many can look like anyone which makes infiltration a huge problem. This challenges the Republic like never before and in an attack that destroys the democratic council allow Military rule to take over. Conscription is enacted as the only answer to the massive threat of the clone armies.

Clone war ends: ends with a planet that is impossible to subdue, somewhere on a massive planet clones keep being grown in vats. War ends when they find a way to destroy the entire planet, completely, even the deep mines that could be anywhere. This is a device set on the planet though it does set the seeds of the idea for a space station with a planet destroying laser, a death star.

Aftermath: cloning technology is verboten, no one uses it for anything for how it is tainted by association is with the Clone Wars, hence by why amputated limbs are replaced with robotics rather than cloned body parts or whole bodies. But clones completely disappear once the cloning vats were destroyed, no clone lives longer than 10 years the war quickly winds down though many parts of the galaxy the clones fight on fruitlessly.

Storm troopers: the war cost money and the conscription was unpopular so even once the clone war was long over the Storm-troopers remain shaking down the trooper-racket of getting new recruits and controlling more resources.

The Jedi are NOT a warrior class though some were fighters, they are a handful of them, priests that lead a dying religion as people can't get in touch with the force any more. They are not any kind of threat to the empire, they cannot fight entire armies or wars. They are more like wild west sheriffs or travelling judges, they go around forming posses and establishing courts, but if their religion is discredited then they are ignored. The Jedis weren't destroyed, they faded away... but the legend remained. Yoda was just one of many Jedi that went off to some far corner of the galaxy when they weren't wanted any more.

Anakin LITERALLY dies in combat, he is dead, but he is resurrected and rebuilt with machines by The Emperor, he is only able to keep living in a zombie cyborg state with The Emperor's power over the force prolonging his life. If Anakin defies the emperor he dooms himself. Darth Vader is a deep-cover personality that Anakin Skywalker adopts to infiltrate the Clone hierarchy. He goes a bit Jack Bauer, doing awful things as he sees it is necessary to stop worse things happening.

Palpatine persuades Anakin that only total obedience will work and put utter faith in the empire and the emperor. Part of bringing Anakin back from the dead fundamentally corrupts him, where he was bad but morally ambiguous before, now he is force choking anyone who stands in his way and running institutionalised abduction and torture programs. Young Anakin see him commanding and assertive yet still restrained, but suffer for his restraint.

Umm... I hate to say it, but all that makes even less sense than what happened in the Prequel Trilogy. Esp. this part:

Anakin LITERALLY dies in combat, he is dead, but he is resurrected and rebuilt with machines by The Emperor, he is only able to keep living in a zombie cyborg state with The Emperor's power over the force prolonging his life. If Anakin defies the emperor he dooms himself. Darth Vader is a deep-cover personality that Anakin Skywalker adopts to infiltrate the Clone hierarchy. He goes a bit Jack Bauer, doing awful things as he sees it is necessary to stop worse things happening.

This is why I usually take fan theories with a whole ocean's worth of salt. Theories that I didn't conceive of myself and aren't contradicted by established canon that is.

 

[irishda]

Spoiler: Breaking Bad

There are lots of allusions regarding color in the series, not the least of which is some of the characters' names are an homage to Reservoir Dogs (the Whites, Pinkman, Hank wears a lot of orange, Skyler wears a lot of blue). One of the theories posits the ending will mirror the end to Reservoir Dogs: Mr. White prepares to kill the cop, Mr. Orange (Hank) while Mr. Pink flees. Just before he kills him, the cops bust in and kill Walter.

 

[JackandTom]

That James Bond is a code name, not a person. Either '007' is used to distinguish James Bond from other codenamed agents, or MI-5 uses '007' because they had 6 agents die before the current string of successful agents. When one of these Bonds dies in the line of duty, they will use '008' to refer to him, and possibly give him a new name.

It is true that in Goldfinger, Bond says "008 will replace me," which does support that theory, but on the other hand 006 and 007 are both together in Goldeneye which shows that Bond didn't replace 006.

James Bond is not a single person, but a codename for agent 007, and all the different incarnations of Bond were different people doing the same job.

On the theory that 'James Bond' is just a codename for different agents to account for the different actors playing him then how would you explain the fact that he visits his wife's grave in For Your eyes Only. His wife died when George Lazenby was playing Bond but Roger Moore's Bond is the one who visits her grave. I know Lee Tamahori, who directed Die Another Day, supports this theory, but he directed xXx 2: The Next Level , so who cares what he thinks?

OP: I just rewatched Total Recall since I bought the new Blu Ray release, and I kind of agree with the theory that it was all a dream after he went in to the Rekall machine. In the film Quaid/Hauser experiences everything that Rekall said he was going to experience, and they even draw attention to this theory a few times in the film. The woman that he meets on Mars is the woman he created for his rekall experience, but on the other hand why would he have been dreaming about her before the rekall experience? You can pretty much argue it both ways but I probably agree with the 'it was all a dream' theory.

 

[Diablo2000]

OP: I just rewatched Total Recall since I bought the new Blu Ray release, and I kind of agree with the theory that it was all a dream after he went in to the Rekall machine. In the film Quaid/Hauser experiences everything that Rekall said he was going to experience, and they even draw attention to this theory a few times in the film. The woman that he meets on Mars is the woman he created for his rekall experience, but on the other hand why would he have been dreaming about her before the rekall experience? You can pretty much argue it both ways but I probably agree with the 'it was all a dream' theory.

Yes, Indeed.
There's also the fact that in the scene where the doctor is explaining how it all works, it shows some locations from later in the film in a monitor, including that weird alien place from the end.

He also leaves Sharon Stone back where she was THE Sharon Stone and I don't buy that unless it was a dream.

Anyway, when alfred saw bruce sitting at the table, selina was the woman he was sitting with, at no point during the film did alfred see selin, and if he had seen her he deffinitly never knew that bruce and her were interested in on another, so why imagine the two of them together

Possibly answered but I haven't gotten that far yet so if it has, I'm sorry.

Selina was the 'waitress' Alfred told to bring Bruce his food when he was locked away in the 'wing' at the start when she steals his mums necklace.

He then obviously finds out she's a jewel thief and Bruce takes an interest in her. Probably doesn't link them romantically at that point but it's not totally out of the question since Bruce goes to a lot of effort, which Alfred presumably knows about, to keep following her. Plus the possibility of conversations that may have happened not included in the movie.

This shit isn't Inception. That scene in the dinner was meant for exact purpose to show that he lived at the end, unlike Inception or Total Recall, this movie didn't gave any indication that the ending could be some type of dream.

 

[J. MB]

I choose to believe that Jack Marston from Red Dead Redemption is the father of The Boss from Metal Gear Solid 3 which also makes him grandfather of Revolver Ocelot, also making Ocelot's fancy for western themes not entirely unusual.

Yes, I know that'd make Marston one of the Philosophers so I like to think that he joined up with one of the armies in World War 1 and rose to prominence and gained much influence and all that guff.

It's really just creative thinking on my part but it's fun to have shared continuity.

 

[Treblaine]

Umm... I hate to say it, but all that makes even less sense than what happened in the Prequel Trilogy. Esp. this part:

Anakin LITERALLY dies in combat, he is dead, but he is resurrected and rebuilt with machines by The Emperor, he is only able to keep living in a zombie cyborg state with The Emperor's power over the force prolonging his life. If Anakin defies the emperor he dooms himself. Darth Vader is a deep-cover personality that Anakin Skywalker adopts to infiltrate the Clone hierarchy. He goes a bit Jack Bauer, doing awful things as he sees it is necessary to stop worse things happening.

This is why I usually take fan theories with a whole ocean's worth of salt. Theories that I didn't conceive of myself and aren't contradicted by established canon that is.

Well it at least explains why at end of Return of the Jedi that Vader dies after being shocked just for a few seconds by The Emperor yet Luke walks away relatively all right after minutes of extended lighting shocking. You know the "help me take this mask off", "but you'll die", "nothing can prevent that now", as The Emperor's power was the only thing keeping Vader/Anakin alive.

The adopting a persona as a cover makes it a lot easier to get into an alternate evil role than just "I had a bad dream about my wife, OK evil Sith I'll be your slave and adopt this blatantly evil sounding name and I'll very quickly forget why I agreed to all this".

The Jack Bauer "do anything it takes" root to torturing and imprisoning people makes a lot more sense than being tricked into doing it for 30 years by a sith and immediately going to murder hundreds of small children and all your friends and colleageus only to end up force choking your pregnant wife anyway.

 

[RJ 17]

Seriously, after playing the EC, I had no choice but to be completely satisfied with the changes because I fucking nailed each of the endings so accurately you might think I was a writer for Bioware. :3

I wouldn't put that on my resume...
I still believe the indoctrination theory completely. I mean the only problem is that it requires me to believe that Bioware would put that much effort in.

Actually, belief in the IT requires that you be in denial about the ME 3 ending...not just because the EC officially showed that the ending was supposed to be taken literally, but because even before the EC, the IT didn't wrap things up nearly as perfectly as people tend to believe. It was a decent theory that drew a lot from all 3 games, but just like with the literal interpretation: it gets all srewed up with the end.

For instance, if indeed Shep is Indoctrinated and everything after the final charge is a hallucination/dream taking place inside Shepard's mind to reveal the internal conflict between breaking free of indoctrination and submitting to it, then this Cycle is already doomed. The IT claims that 2 of the 3 endings are really traps, you're not supposed to follow TIM (the blue ending), or give in to what the Reapers have always wanted (green ending), you're supposed to stay the course and go with what you mission has always been: follow Anderson to destroy the Reapers (red ending). So choosing blue or green means Shepard gets indoctrinated, choosing red means Shepard breaks free. Ok. So you break free, nothing on the Citadel ever happened......doesn't that mean the Reapers are still rampaging and slaughtering your fleet? Doesn't it mean - best case scenario - that Shepard wakes up half-dead after having been blasted by a Reaper laser to find himself surrounded by corpses on an empty battlefield as more ship debris rains down from the sky?

That's the problem with the IT, it's best-case scenario implies that no matter what, this cycle loses, yet this can't be the case because no matter what ending you choose, you still get the Star Gazer scene talking about how Shepard was a great hero who won over the Reapers. If THAT'S the case, then you really WERE fighting a hopeless conflict throughout 3 games, and all the choices you made turn out to be even more pointless than many say they are with the literal interpretation.

And for that matter, even if Shepard does chose blue or green...that means he or she becomes Indoctrinated, right? Sooooooo why bother showing him or her the images of victory? "Yeah, you're our slave now, but we'll make you think that you control us or that you......no longer exist and have unifed the galaxy into a single species of organic-synthetic hybrids." There'd be no need to. They either already control Shepard and so the cycle is doomed, or Shepard breaks free but is still laying critically wounded on the battlefield with no one to fire the Crucible, meaning yet again: the cycle is doomed.

Like I said, the IT does a great job of tying a lot of things together throughout the entire 3-game story, but if you ask me even before the EC, the IT's coverage of the end crumbles apart much worse than people accused the literal interpretation.

And being a writer for Bioware USED to be something to brag about. I agree they botched the ending pretty hard...to think they could give us something that equates to "what color do you want to paint the galaxy?" and not piss off their entire fanbase is ridiculous. But since - obviously - I always applied to the literal interpretation of the ending, all that was missing for me was closure, and the EC delivered that.

 

[Amgeo]

I believe that James Bond is a Time Lord.

I believe that Firefly is a prequel to Star Trek, and also that River Tam is a Slayer.



I also have a fan theory about MLP that I have turned into a fan comic over here http://thousandyearsunrise.deviantart.com/gallery/37268241

Fan comics are better than fan fiction because... reasons. Science reasons.