Hmm, I knew he was considered for the role but I didn't realise Burton was so set on him.prince_xedar said:It's just my personal opinion, and that fact that he was Tim Burton's first choice is also a huge indication of just what could have been.
in this tone then, Do you prefer Nicholson's Joker or Ledger's Joker?
As for Heath Ledger, well first I'd have to make the skeptical comment that his portrayal would not have been widely lauded (largely by the non-comic-savvy media) as it was had it not been his last role - in the same way that Bella Lugosi's appearance in Plan 9 from Outer Space was immortalised by the fact he died half way through production - that's not to detract from their performance, it's just they were given an unusual emphasis.
Having said that, I prefer Ledger's Joker but only because it reflects the incarnation of the Joker I find the most appealing. There have been many incarnations of the Joker and while Nicholson catches the more 'goony' Golden Age/Silver Age villian with a nasty streak, Ledger's portrayal is more akin to the 'counter-Batman' - a Joker who defines himself and justifies his existence as the antithesis to the Dark Knight and that closeness between these two heavyweights, the Joker and the Bat, is, I find, their conflict at its most compelling.
Anyhow, I waffled on a bit there; would you say one portrayal shines through more than the other?