I think you mean omnivores, not herbivores.Nicholas Woodruff said:Not feeding our children meat is Child Abuse.
It's scientifically proven that a Vegetarian diet cannot provide the same nutrients that a Herbivore diet can, just as a Carnivorous diet cannot provide the same nutrients that a Herbivore diet can.
There's a reason Homo Sapiens are Herbivores.
the science of my fist. it would be a taunt. i have no science to back it up. all i know is i have 3 freinds who are vegetarians and they are all protien deficient and have to take pills for it. also: how many ufc fighters do you know that are vegetarian? does the army serve its troops exclusively salad? im just saying i havent met very many strong vegetarians.CarlMinez said:What science is that founded on? Scientific consensus says that a vegetarian lifestyle might actually improve your overall physical condition, whereas meat and animal fat has been linked to obesity in countless studios.joshthor said:if i had kids and someone said that to me while i was feeding them meat someone would get punched in the throat. i'd tell my kids "meat made me strong enough to do that, and the weak vegetarian is gasping because he does not have enough protien"
Oh, and there is an addendum to Free Speech. It happened, gosh, quite a while ago, around Herbert Hoover's time. It adds that Free Speech is acceptable as long as it doesn't endanger any other human being. Yelling "fire" in a cinema is a felony, because it causes panic and people die by being trampled.zehydra said:It is not the same. When people talk about what Child Abuse IS, they are talking about what people should consider Child Abuse to be. This billboard is being normative, not descriptive about child abuse.TU4AR said:HOLY SHIT FUCKING EPIC WINVenereus said:
Well, claiming feeding a child meat to be "child abuse" (a crime) is blatantly incorrect. It's like saying that farting is drink driving; it's just plain wrong. So, that's how you'd say it's false. It's not expressing opinion, it's supposed fact. Which is not true.zehydra said:but who's to say what's false? By what method is the government to determine the truth or falsity of a statement? Would every bit of false information have to go through something like a court process?
The reason you can't say "Fire!" in a cinema, is because it disrupts people from watching the movie, which is bad for business. The Cinema puts in that rule in order to prevent loss of business. However, this isn't a restriction of freedom of speech, because its the Cinema enforcing this rule, not the government.
http://www.google.com/search?q=SCIENCE&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&aq=t&rls=org.mozilla:en-USBoba Frag said:I'm not sure about you, but speaking for myself, not everything I eat is meat...The Apothecarry said:Meat is murder. Sweet, sweet, delicious murder.
We evolved to become carnivores, not herbivores. It's not an opinion: It's SCIENCE.
![]()
And some fact checking before you scream Science! at people would be nice.
Homo sapiens are in fact omnivores, not carnivores.
Humanity evolved to be able to process both meat based and plant based foods.
http://wiki.answers.com/Q/Are_humans_omnivores_or_herbivores
But back to the OP- I see what Peta are trying to do, I just think they're being incredibly militant and obnoxious about it.
Education, not moralising will change how animals are treated.
EDIT:
I see I was ninja'ed! Disregard my post then![]()
Look at all that delicious science!GRYPHOM said:http://www.google.com/search?q=SCIENCE&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&aq=t&rls=org.mozilla:en-USBoba Frag said:I'm not sure about you, but speaking for myself, not everything I eat is meat...The Apothecarry said:Meat is murder. Sweet, sweet, delicious murder.
We evolved to become carnivores, not herbivores. It's not an opinion: It's SCIENCE.
![]()
And some fact checking before you scream Science! at people would be nice.
Homo sapiens are in fact omnivores, not carnivores.
Humanity evolved to be able to process both meat based and plant based foods.
http://wiki.answers.com/Q/Are_humans_omnivores_or_herbivores
But back to the OP- I see what Peta are trying to do, I just think they're being incredibly militant and obnoxious about it.
Education, not moralising will change how animals are treated.
EDIT:
I see I was ninja'ed! Disregard my post then![]()
fficial&client=firefox-a#q=SCIENCE&oe=utf-8&rls=org.mozilla:en-US
fficial&client=firefox-a&um=1&ie=UTF-8&tbo=u&tbs=vid:1&source=og&sa=N&hl=en&tab=wv&bav=on.2,or.r_gc.r_pw.&fp=d3a06b8f617e5e91
SCIENCE!
This is probably the most intelligent and insightful things I've read on these forums in a long time.Vidiot said:Good, good! Give in to your hate. I can feel it growing. Seriously though, PETA is yet another organization pandering to people who refuse to believe that the world is a complex place full of compromise and balance. People who lean on extremism as a crutch simply can't understand that there's no such thing as "pure good" or "pure evil".
It seems that some of the worst evil ever carried out in this world is started from good intentions. This applies to everything from PETA, religious fundamentalism, (Christian, Jews, and everyone else, not just Muslims) to politics.
This kind of backwards "logic" reminds me of one of the endings for Soul Calibur. The "good" sword wins, and the earth is covered in ice. ...And the world was at peace forever. Life is not black and white, it's shades of gray. There are answers to the great questions of existence, but those answers are difficult and complex. Such is life.