Films You Really Don't Want To See Remakes Of

Recommended Videos

tigermilk

New member
Sep 4, 2010
951
0
0
Sikachu said:
All films? Ever? Except the semi-remake of Manhunter into Silence of the Lambs. I like Silence of the Lambs.
I think 'Manhunter' (1986) was based on the first of the Thomas Harris novels and then 'Silence of the Lambs' (1991) on the second. One of the more recent adaptations 'Red Dragon' (2002) was a remake of 'Manhunter' or second adaptation of the novel. I get your point though about 'Silence of the Lambs' being a "semi-remake" as I don't think there is any reference to 'Manhunter' in it and Anthony Hopkins is far more iconic and well remembered than William Cox essentially being seen as 'Hannibal Lecktor'. Also according to IMDB in America the working title of 'Hannibal' (2001) was 'Silence of the Lambs 2'.
 

individual11

New member
Sep 6, 2010
262
0
0
Uh... Ghost In the Shell and Neon Genesis Evangelion? Oh... right, they're happening already...

Yeah, I really want to see a live action G.I.T.S. set in New York, directed by lens flare/shakycam addicted "creatives".
 

tigermilk

New member
Sep 4, 2010
951
0
0
mikozero said:
in all honesty i think you could count the number of legitimately good remakes on one hand and that, given the amount of them that have been produced over the years, suggests that in general they are a bad thing.
I'm inclined to agree about most remakes being pretty poor. In my opinion there are certain trends with well made remakes, specifically a good director and to a lesser extent a good cast. In my opening post I used the directors who were in their part responsible for poor looking films (never bothered to see them) and directors who I found the names of by googling the films. This is opposed to knowing Scorsese made 'The Departed', De Palma made 'Scarface' (1983) and Huston made 'The Maltese Falcon' (1941), namely directors who warrant discussion and critical engagement beyond being part of a culture of remakes. In essence directors who may be cited in terms of auteur theory (Scorsese being the most obvious of the three in my opinion) as opposed to just employees being paid to work to a schedule.
 

Sikachu

New member
Apr 20, 2010
464
0
0
tigermilk said:
Sikachu said:
All films? Ever? Except the semi-remake of Manhunter into Silence of the Lambs. I like Silence of the Lambs.
I think 'Manhunter' (1986) was based on the first of the Thomas Harris novels and then 'Silence of the Lambs' (1991) on the second. One of the more recent adaptations 'Red Dragon' (2002) was a remake of 'Manhunter' or second adaptation of the novel. I get your point though about 'Silence of the Lambs' being a "semi-remake" as I don't think there is any reference to 'Manhunter' in it and Anthony Hopkins is far more iconic and well remembered than William Cox essentially being seen as 'Hannibal Lecktor'. Also according to IMDB in America the working title of 'Hannibal' (2001) was 'Silence of the Lambs 2'.
Learn something new every day :). Hannibal and Red Dragon were terrible (imo). Definitely worse than Manhunter, which I would have said was reasonably good if it hadn't been for Silence of the Lambs showing us what Lector could be. Please don't get me started on Hannibal Rising.
 

tigermilk

New member
Sep 4, 2010
951
0
0
[/quote]Please don't get me started on Hannibal Rising.[/quote]

So what do you think of Hannibal Rising ;)

edit: Still not mastered editing quotes.
 

Captain Pirate

New member
Nov 18, 2009
1,875
0
0
Any distinctly British film, specifically Guy Ritchie's work, and films with Simon Pegg and Nick Frost in, redone by Americans. You guys have ruined enough of our TV series already, and we never do the same to your greats, so if you dare tarnish the bastion of awesome that is Hot Fuzz, I will personally declare war.

Other films: Inception, The Usual Suspects, The Matrix Trilogy, and some others I really can't be fucked to name.. they've already been said anyhoo.

In a relatively linked topic I really wish the Harry Potter films had been done with an extended version a la Lord Of The Rings, as the films miss out so much awesome that the books cover in detail. Quidditch World Cup, anyone?
 

GideonB

New member
Jul 26, 2008
359
0
0
Captain Pirate said:
Any distinctly British film, specifically Guy Ritchie's work, and films with Simon Pegg and Nick Frost in, redone by Americans. You guys have ruined enough of our TV series already, and we never do the same to your greats, so if you dare tarnish the bastion of awesome that is Hot Fuzz, I will personally declare war.
Shaun of the Dead will never EVER be remade by the Americans. They WILL fuck it up.
 

Mr.Pandah

Pandah Extremist
Jul 20, 2008
3,967
0
0
The Thing. The original is fine just the way it is. I've heard that a remake is slated to release next year.
 

tigermilk

New member
Sep 4, 2010
951
0
0
Captain Pirate said:
Any distinctly British film, specifically Guy Ritchie's work, and films with Simon Pegg and Nick Frost in, redone by Americans. You guys have ruined enough of our TV series already, and we never do the same to your greats, so if you dare tarnish the bastion of awesome that is Hot Fuzz, I will personally declare war.

Other films: Inception, The Usual Suspects, The Matrix Trilogy, and some others I really can't be fucked to name.. they've already been said anyhoo.

In a relatively linked topic I really wish the Harry Potter films had been done with an extended version a la Lord Of The Rings, as the films miss out so much awesome that the books cover in detail. Quidditch World Cup, anyone?
Have you ever seen the American pilot for 'Red Dwarf', if not it is even worse than you think (trust me it is possible).

In terms of British films, other than all of Shane Meadows work up to and including 'Dead Mans Shoes' is Danny Boyles early work, 'Shallow Grave' (1994) and specifically 'Trainspotting' (1996) must never be remade by Hollywood (while I think "independent" American versions would be poor, Hollywood trainspotting, no... just no.
 

Sronpop

New member
Mar 26, 2009
805
0
0
Right, lets try to be different, everyone is ssaying a lot of the same stuff, and while all true, I haven't seen this one mentioned.

The Life Of Brian, its comedy will never be matched.

For those people saying A Clockwork Orange and Fear And Loathing in Las Vegas, no one has the fucking balls to even try pull that off because it is impossible.

Overall I am against remaking movies.
 

Canid117

New member
Oct 6, 2009
4,075
0
0
AlphaOmega said:
Blade Runner

Or an american hot fuzz *shivers*
Hot Fuzz is a little too recent to be remade at this point so its pretty safe for the next ten years at least.

OT: Indiana Jones. Enough damage has already been done to that franchise.
 

tigermilk

New member
Sep 4, 2010
951
0
0
'Birth of a Nation' (Griffith 1915), I sincerely hope this isn't remade with the black/African-American characters replaced with Muslim characters. It really doesn't feel that it couldn't happen... If Hollywood is listening, please no!
 

The Overmatt

New member
Oct 4, 2008
56
0
0
Mr.Pandah said:
The Thing. The original is fine just the way it is. I've heard that a remake is slated to release next year.
Well the John Carpenter version is already a remake, though in all reality the two are very different movies. But yes, I agree, doesn't need to be remade AGAIN.