I guess if that isn't a selling point, then having 3 disc is reason enough to never consider buying a 360.TPiddy said:Oh heaven forbid you get off your fucking couch for 5 minutes to change a disc.... this is NOT a selling point for the PS3 folks.
Oh it was brilliant alright... brilliantly boring and tedious.TelHybrid said::O 10 was the best one! Come on the sphere grid was a brilliant system!ToonLink said:Final Fantasy stopped being good after 7, so.... who cares?
Yeah I can understand, I suppose if you have both systems it would be a selling point when deciding which system to get it on... but really, people try to find every angle they can, even the ridiculously stupid ones.s69-5 said:Actually, after the mess that was the disk swapping process in Star Ocean 4, it IS a selling point Piddy. Maybe not for you particularly, but it is. Granted on the PS1, Square did a good job of content separation.TPiddy said:Oh heaven forbid you get off your fucking couch for 5 minutes to change a disc.... this is NOT a selling point for the PS3 folks.
I'd say the annoyance factor is about the same as having to wait 5 minutes the first time you put in many (but not all) PS3 games.
PS2 had plenty of disc-swapping... If you were new to consoles and you had to buy one in order to play this game, obviously this is advantage PS3, but if this is the sole factor in your decision that's just retarded.Jiraiya72 said:I guess if that isn't a selling point, then having 3 disc is reason enough to never consider buying a 360.TPiddy said:Oh heaven forbid you get off your fucking couch for 5 minutes to change a disc.... this is NOT a selling point for the PS3 folks.
Umm the 360 uses DL DVDs which hold 8 gigs...Sgt. Dante said:360 Dvd = 4.7 GB storageBatfred said:Any idea on PS3 yet? It's so annoying having to change disk mid-game.
Ps3 DVD = 25 gig storage.
If it's not single disk on the ps3 I'll be surprised.
Guess we should go back to cd's then. We could have twelve disc games, think of all the fun! I have the cd version of Quake 4 for the PC and it is simply annoying to have to switch disks four times to install the game. But at least I only have to do it once per install unlike the 360 which could have easily handled the multi disc issue by letting the games be installed in the same way PC games are. But of course that would have required having a hard drive in every console and probably something more than twenty gigabytes.outcast_within said:10hours play 10second disk change. big deal how?
Yes you are correct. I have no idea why people think FF7 has 4 discs.simmeh said:I have all three games sitting beside me right now. FFVII has 3 discs, FFVIII and IX have 4.soh21 said:They all had four, though each disc contained a large amount, and you kind of knew when a disc change was coming up. I prefer to think of them as serials, or episodic, if you will.Agayek said:FF7-9 all had 3 discs IIRC.Distorted Stu said:Didnt FF8 have 4?
Should be good then!
Been forever and a day since I played any of them though, so I could easily be wrong.
Or, in the case of Final Fantasy VII, time to reflect on what just happened and try to convince yourself that it didn't. That was the longest, most emotionally taxing disc change ever.Hazy said:Am I weird for absolutely loving the disc-change screens?
They were like 3 minutes to stare at great screenshots while reflecting upon that awesome boss that you just slayed some 6 minutes back.
The only thing Nightmarish about it was the last bosss69-5 said:1 Disk as it should be. Glad I own a PS3 and will not have to disk swap constantly. I hear Star Ocean 4 was nightmarish on the 360. I will be getting that one for PS3 as well...
Seconded. Except -- well, FFIX was okay.ToonLink said:Final Fantasy stopped being good after 7, so.... who cares?
Why would you own both a PS3 and Xbox 360? So you can play BioShock on two different controllers?TPiddy said:Yeah I can understand, I suppose if you have both systems it would be a selling point when deciding which system to get it on... but really, people try to find every angle they can, even the ridiculously stupid ones.s69-5 said:Actually, after the mess that was the disk swapping process in Star Ocean 4, it IS a selling point Piddy. Maybe not for you particularly, but it is. Granted on the PS1, Square did a good job of content separation.TPiddy said:Oh heaven forbid you get off your fucking couch for 5 minutes to change a disc.... this is NOT a selling point for the PS3 folks.
I'd say the annoyance factor is about the same as having to wait 5 minutes the first time you put in many (but not all) PS3 games.
Yes, multiplat is awesome, just like consoles that duplicate most of each other's major releases are awesome and monopolistic competition is awesome.s69-5 said:Agreed. Frankly, the fact that it's multiplat means more people get to enjoy it. More people enjoying it is way better than the alternative.TPiddy said:Yeah I can understand, I suppose if you have both systems it would be a selling point when deciding which system to get it on... but really, people try to find every angle they can, even the ridiculously stupid ones.s69-5 said:Actually, after the mess that was the disk swapping process in Star Ocean 4, it IS a selling point Piddy. Maybe not for you particularly, but it is. Granted on the PS1, Square did a good job of content separation.TPiddy said:Oh heaven forbid you get off your fucking couch for 5 minutes to change a disc.... this is NOT a selling point for the PS3 folks.
I'd say the annoyance factor is about the same as having to wait 5 minutes the first time you put in many (but not all) PS3 games.
Ok, I can't believe the amount of stupid that went into this post.EzraPound said:Why would you own both a PS3 and Xbox 360? So you can play BioShock on two different controllers?