First Kinect Sex Game Prototype Pops Up [NSFW]
- Thread starter Greg Tito
- Start date
Recommended Videos
I agree there. I'm not a fan of the Wii, and Kinect is rubbish. I mean I enjoyed the soccer thing at EB I tried, but then I realised that it's supposed to track movements, but it only actually kicks the ball in one of three directions. Buuut.... I have a confession to make.Kouen said:
I kinda like the Move. Of the three of them it has the best functionality, and while it pretty much is just an upgraded Wiimote, it actually WORKS. As a controller to replace the normal DualShock it doesn't stand a chance, but I'm more than happy to waste a bit of time enjoying the hell out of games like Resi Evil 5, Dead Space Extraction, Killzone 3 and Heavy Rain with movement
I can see the Move having a future. The Wii obviously has one, but only with the casual crowd.The Kinect... It might sell well as it seems to be already sadly, but it's entirely a gimmick and has no functionality outside of mini-games and sports. I mean, out of all 15 laucnh titles, how many genres were there? Even if you count fitness as a different genre, you still only get dance, sport and fitness. Oh and racing, kinda... And look at the release schedule. Other than those, you still have nothing new. In fact, they're all rehashes by different devs.
The Move has a future as a fun distraction and a slightly different but not serious way to play real games like shooters and (PLEASE) RTS's. The Kinect does not.
rule 34 everyone,only the slight change here is that if the technology exists where will be porn ON IT,no exceptions! just wow...well at least be thankful its just sex and nothing like sex with gore/gibbed things...well now i feel sick...but yeah...oh god now i REALLY hope it doesnt happen now...
This is kind of neat to be honest.
To be honest the idea doesn't really bother me that much, what's more let's say they do manage to come up with a system that lets people have sex that is just as satisfying as the real thing physically. I can't see this without neural interface technology, but let's say they do.
What this means is that all the effort spent pursueing that need can be invested anywhere, someone has the urge, of either gender, they can give themselves perfect, fully satisfying orgasms. It would take a lot of the tension out of social dynamics, and allow a lot of people to focus on doing other things, and not worrying about rejection or their physical appearance constantly in case they get that need. I think the usefulness goes well beyond the "hopelessly unappealing nerd" demographic and into something everyone will use, whether they admit it or not.
Of course there are other issues involved in this. Among them the simple fact that women have a lot of their power rooted in sexuality. There have been a lot of things written about the "dildo factor" and how women can satisfy themselves considerably better than guys can through masterbation. A lot of our social dynamics are based around this kind of general imbalance (if you think about it) and the simple fact that sex is something that everyone
is driven to need. There has been some speculative fiction that has ran with the idea that the biggest opposition to the development of a truely effective male masturbation tool would be women's rights groups because actual "sexual liberation" from this cycle would strike at the base of power a lot of women hold onto. While other reasons would be stated, including things like "exploitation" (if there are visual constructs involved) this is probably what it would boil down to.
Oh sure, REAL sex is always going to be better for emotional reasons if nothing else, but removing the driving NEED due to there being an acceptable alternative would be interesting.
What's more, one has to wonder once we achieve this goal, where all the creative energy which tries to use every new bit of technology sexually is going to go. Freed from that all consuming pursuit, we might see an explosive (heh) leap forward in energy being used elsewhere. Or perhaps the dawn of the apocolypse as development ceases and we all wank ourselves back to the stone age (unlikely, but it would be amusing). Just imagine aliens landing and finding our fallen civilization, was it warfare? Atomics? science gone out of control releasing zombie viruses? No, it was satisfying home sex games which caused us to forget everything until society fell apart and they stopped working, causing people to crawl out of their homes to find the true state of society and begin cannibalizing each other....
To be honest the idea doesn't really bother me that much, what's more let's say they do manage to come up with a system that lets people have sex that is just as satisfying as the real thing physically. I can't see this without neural interface technology, but let's say they do.
What this means is that all the effort spent pursueing that need can be invested anywhere, someone has the urge, of either gender, they can give themselves perfect, fully satisfying orgasms. It would take a lot of the tension out of social dynamics, and allow a lot of people to focus on doing other things, and not worrying about rejection or their physical appearance constantly in case they get that need. I think the usefulness goes well beyond the "hopelessly unappealing nerd" demographic and into something everyone will use, whether they admit it or not.
Of course there are other issues involved in this. Among them the simple fact that women have a lot of their power rooted in sexuality. There have been a lot of things written about the "dildo factor" and how women can satisfy themselves considerably better than guys can through masterbation. A lot of our social dynamics are based around this kind of general imbalance (if you think about it) and the simple fact that sex is something that everyone
is driven to need. There has been some speculative fiction that has ran with the idea that the biggest opposition to the development of a truely effective male masturbation tool would be women's rights groups because actual "sexual liberation" from this cycle would strike at the base of power a lot of women hold onto. While other reasons would be stated, including things like "exploitation" (if there are visual constructs involved) this is probably what it would boil down to.
Oh sure, REAL sex is always going to be better for emotional reasons if nothing else, but removing the driving NEED due to there being an acceptable alternative would be interesting.
What's more, one has to wonder once we achieve this goal, where all the creative energy which tries to use every new bit of technology sexually is going to go. Freed from that all consuming pursuit, we might see an explosive (heh) leap forward in energy being used elsewhere. Or perhaps the dawn of the apocolypse as development ceases and we all wank ourselves back to the stone age (unlikely, but it would be amusing). Just imagine aliens landing and finding our fallen civilization, was it warfare? Atomics? science gone out of control releasing zombie viruses? No, it was satisfying home sex games which caused us to forget everything until society fell apart and they stopped working, causing people to crawl out of their homes to find the true state of society and begin cannibalizing each other....
I'm not surprised that a game like this is being created. Just look at the history of video gaming. Heck, there was a game back on the Atari 2600 in which the reward for winning a level was to allow the hero (wearing an Army hat of the 1860s) to rape a Native American woman. So tell me again why you are shocked that a sex game would be introduced with the XBox Kinect in mind?
