Foreskin Man is an anti-semitic COMIC BOOK ?!?!?!?!

[similar.squirrel]

Anti-Semites just love thinking about cocks.

 

[Biosophilogical]

I am also wondering what would happen if it were done in utero. If you say it would be wrong, you would have to admit that the unborn have some rights... Mmmm... That has me thinking...

If you are raising the issue of abortion ... well that's easy to resolve.

1. First off (in case the '1' didn't give away the order ), most people who are pro-abortion are not for abortion at all times during pregnancy. Most are for the idea that abortion should only be legal up to the point that the future-baby develops cognitive capacity (so when it becomes a person, rather than a lump of cells with no pain receptors/mental processing). So supporting the idea of in utero circumcision doesn't support abortion.

2. I'd say in utero circumcision is unethical. In comparison to abortion, the future person was never actually a person and never would have been. In utero circumcision on the other hand, does affect the future of a person (though technically, it would be ethical so long as the child was also aborted before it developed brain functionality). I do admit though, if there was a way to perform a circumcision on a feotus (I'm sure I've spelt that wrong), before full brain functionality emerged, and without increasing the normal circumcision risks by doing it prior to birth ... that would make it more ethical than post-birth circumcision simply because of the decrease in pain that could otherwise be caused. It wouldn't make it ethical, just less unethical.

OT: I kind of don't want to click on the link for a comic about 'Foreskin man'. It sounds unsafe. As for circumcision, I think that it should be the person's choice when they are a legally aged adult. And no, it shouldn't be protected by religious freedom, because it is your religion, and I don't believe you should have the right to cause changes to other people without their consent. Basically, it is your religion, and if you want to chop off your foreskin in its name, go ahead, but you have no right to physically inflict your religion on other people.

 

[Charli]

What...


I honestly can't elaborate more than that one word so here is some filler to fufill escapist post requirements. All that can be said about this is simply in that one word. "What."

Let us give thanks to "What" and all the encompassing rubbish that falls under it. Amen.

Edit: Oh and who ever the artist is...

... *Family Guy Monkey Point* Yeah.

 

[ninja51]

...No one is walking out of that story not retarded. He wrote a comic book... ugh it truely is shocking how stupid people are, like I cant even comprehend this. Not only does an anti circunsism law trying to be made, but the fact that this guy sat down, and desided the best way to aid in his foolish battle was to make a comic book.

See if the thing was a joke, awesome, that guys cool. But shit! This ma fuckas serious!

 

[Kakashi on crack]

I wonder why people are against circumcision?
people have done worse things to their pride and other parts of their body and they are fine with that but not this?

Because we don't have the choice or force to dissaprove of it when we're an infant. It's genital mutiliation without consent at its finest.

OT: Yeah, this comic is not helping... Its kinda going yah know, against it...

Scientists keep saying that Circumcision prevents HIV, but graphs and surveys have shown the exact opposite, and that the places with higher circumcision rates, such as Africa and the U.S., actualyl have some fo the highest HIV rates in the world. (can say this is attributed to culture, but from my current knowledge and having friends in Europe, this is not the case...)

Can't find the links to the graphs, but this guy's video has them:



EDIT: and I fail at embedding, link: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=adiiK9sPx_Y

 

[Kakashi on crack]

-snip for the sake of forum space-

Its not a matter of the parents doing it for the "child's benefit" but the fact that they're removing something that there is no need to remove without the child having any say. Said child typically has to go through a painful surgery in which they'll pass out from the extreme pain because most doctors will not sedate the child when they circumcise them, thinking that because of their young age, they will not feel it.



The foreskin serves to, ah... What's an appropriate way to put this... Make the reproductive acts more pleasureable by helping to increase girth as well as provide additional pleasure stimulants since a large number of them are located in the foreskin.

On top of that, it keeps the tip from rubbing against materials such as underwear or jean zippers which would otherwise desensitize the penis over time and make it less pleasurable.

 

[Wintermoot]

I wonder why people are against circumcision?
people have done worse things to their pride and other parts of their body and they are fine with that but not this?

Genital mutilation of infants that cannot give consent is pretty fucked up, friend.

I get that they want to outlaw that but what if a grown man wants to get a circumcision?

 

[Gigano]

...Foreskin man?

I don't care what that is, it is by rights of name alone way too preposterously absurd to be criticised in any rational manner.

But yeah, don't go making any irreversible surgical alterations on your child when it's much too young to offer an opinion on it, much less an informed consent. That's no better than putting botox in its head so that it may conform to some other cultural standard.

 

[Dragonclaw]

Why is "comic book" the part that capitalized? I mean, it's not the "comic" aspect of this story that's confusing me.

Because in all honesty I was in such a WTF state I didn't know what part of the story was stranger...and I'm STILL not really sure...

 

[Hero in a half shell]

I really hope he is included in the new reboot of DC comics, come on DC, this is what the failing comic book industry needs to keep afloat, I'm not sure what on earth this guys deal is, but please buy and use this character!

 

[Zer_]

I wonder why people are against circumcision?
people have done worse things to their pride and other parts of their body and they are fine with that but not this?
PS
I assumed he want,s to outlaw all forms of circumcision I get that he want,s to ban it for small kids but what I don,t get is that he also want,s to outlaw it for adult men who can make their own decisions.

The people take issue with the fact that it is done on children who have no say on it. Such permanent changes on their bodies at an early age kinda sucks, especially if you don't want it.

 

[Frozen Donkey Wheel2]

Why is "comic book" the part that capitalized? I mean, it's not the "comic" aspect of this story that's confusing me.

Because in all honesty I was in such a WTF state I didn't know what part of the story was stranger...and I'm STILL not really sure...

Really? Cause to me it seems like it's the "Foreskin Man" part.

 

[Sinclair Solutions]

HA HA HA, this is so ridiculous.

HAHAAHA

WTF?

You see though, I think this falls under ridiculously funny prejudice. So much so, I'm finding it hard to get riled up against it.

Same here. Who ever thought this was a good idea...Oh, man.

It reminds me of the Anti-Circumscision movement from Arrested Development.