I actually took what I said about daystar back, and I was trying to stop the conversation about him. Also, I used hounds an example of the low content rule failing because it had been the most recent one I saw, no other reason. I'm indifferent to you mateFappy said:Holy cow this thread got derailed. Can we stop publicly calling out users for mod wrath and start discussing the OP? The topic is relevant to pretty much everyone using the forums at then moment.
Matthew94 said:Hazy992 said:He's one of the most modest people on this site.![]()
I agreed with you up until that point.
I hope you weren't being serious![]()
Fappy said:Holy crap this is going to take some getting used to.
I think I'll force myself to use the new layout and see how I like it.SmashLovesTitanQuest said:I.... Don't know if I like this or not. After 6000 posts done in roughly the same design, it's a bit startling.
I suggest a bright yellow or maybe bright red?Fappy said:May I suggest that the nameplate part of the bar above every post be blue? I like how the buttons on the right-hand side light up blue, but I feels too bland with so much grey.
EDIT: It is especially bad for staff posts. The orange on grey looks icky.
As am I to you, I just want the OP discussed to death so my eyes stop bleeding every time I read a mod's name now. Seriously, trying to read gold letters on dark grey is hemorrhaging my brain! D:ToastiestZombie said:I actually took what I said about daystar back, and I was trying to stop the conversation about him. Also, I used hounds an example of the low content rule failing because it had been the most recent one I saw, no other reason. I'm indifferent to you mateFappy said:Holy cow this thread got derailed. Can we stop publicly calling out users for mod wrath and start discussing the OP? The topic is relevant to pretty much everyone using the forums at then moment.![]()
A benefit of Publisher's club has always been an early look at changes. They were given the same ability to toggle the forum layout as you, just a week earlier as they've been promised. While these changes didn't come with a heads up, they did come with the a toggle that's easily accessible.MelasZepheos said:derp
Profile still shows 85x85 as the limit, and when i tried a 100x100 it seemed to still resize it to that size. Smaller avatars also look a bit off-center.Nasrin said:We've improved the functionality of the forums, fixing buttons that didn't work and whatnot. Otherwise, the only difference is color and your ability to have larger avatars and more badges. We made these changes because we considered them to be an improvement, of course.
85x85 is the new nonmember avatar size limit. Pubclub members now have 115x115, up from 100x100.lapan said:Profile still shows 85x85 as the limit, and when i tried a 100x100 it seemed to still resize it to that size. Smaller avatars also look a bit off-center.Nasrin said:We've improved the functionality of the forums, fixing buttons that didn't work and whatnot. Otherwise, the only difference is color and your ability to have larger avatars and more badges. We made these changes because we considered them to be an improvement, of course.
Makes sense. Seeing a few members with even larger avatars confused me then.Fappy said:85x85 is the new nonmember avatar size limit. Pubclub members now have 115x115, up from 100x100.lapan said:Profile still shows 85x85 as the limit, and when i tried a 100x100 it seemed to still resize it to that size. Smaller avatars also look a bit off-center.Nasrin said:We've improved the functionality of the forums, fixing buttons that didn't work and whatnot. Otherwise, the only difference is color and your ability to have larger avatars and more badges. We made these changes because we considered them to be an improvement, of course.
And the rest of the points that I made?ThyNameIsMud said:A benefit of Publisher's club has always been an early look at changes. They were given the same ability to toggle the forum layout as you, just a week earlier as they've been promised. While these changes didn't come with a heads up, they did come with the a toggle that's easily accessible.MelasZepheos said:snip
They do it until we notice and then we warn them and they stop.ToastiestZombie said:They do that anyway, I've seen that done quite a lot. The low content rule itself encourages it, not how it's moderated.Nasrin said:Well that's why we have an appeals system. It gives people an opportunity to explain themselves.
I'm telling you, making it about post count only encourages people to write random things down such as "adding content to avoid moderation", which will actually encourage spam rather than discourage it.
ToastiestZombie said:Also, can I appeal my suspension.
Have you updated your badge order since? I believe you need to go to your badges and click 'save order' for the new sizes and badges to take effect.lapan said:Profile still shows 85x85 as the limit, and when i tried a 100x100 it seemed to still resize it to that size. Smaller avatars also look a bit off-center.Nasrin said:We've improved the functionality of the forums, fixing buttons that didn't work and whatnot. Otherwise, the only difference is color and your ability to have larger avatars and more badges. We made these changes because we considered them to be an improvement, of course.
Also the toggle link needs a linebreak:
[http://img191.imagevenue.com/img.php?image=th_741969868_toggle_122_375lo.jpg]![]()
This post is not in any way on topic.Kungfu_Teddybear said:Yep, I have to agree. Daystar is in no way egotistical, and thinking otherwise is ridiculous. He's popular because he's an awesome guy, he's witty and he makes people laugh. End of story.Hazy992 said:His ego? Are we talking about the same Daystar Clarion here? Daystar's repeatedly said he doesn't want people holding him in such high regard and he doesn't like the idea of forum celebrities. He's one of the most modest people on this site. You're just hating him for being popular, it's not his fault people like him.ToastiestZombie said:I don't know really. I think it maybe the fact that people hold him in high acclaim, even when he let's his ego get the better of him. For example the brovengers thread had no discussion value whatsoever, but people were fine with it because it was a daystar thread. I just don't like celebrities and favouritism in any site, so of course daystar gets on my nerves but he is one funny lad, so I don't hate him that much.Hazy992 said:Fair enough. It's just people might take it personally even if you don't mean it to be taken that way.ToastiestZombie said:I take that back, I do kind of have something with daystar that bugs me. But now is not the time to speak about it. O would go edit mynpost, but I'm on this damn iPod an doing that would be a pain.
EDIT: Think you could make people's titles slightly bigger? I think that'd look better
EDIT 2: What actually is it about Daystar that bugs you so much?
As for the Brovengers thread it did have discussion value as a forum game which is why it was moved there. If this favouritism you keep claiming exists actually does exist the mods wouldn't have moved it.
Also, Hazy, I'm the most modest person on this site. That is why I am The Modest Brovenger. I'm so modest it hurts.
The rest of the points you've made will be taking into consideration with the design team. This design was never set in stone, and we're only looking to make a pleasant forum experience for you guys. We're actively reviewing your criticisms/suggestions and are making some changes based on them.MelasZepheos said:And the rest of the points that I made?ThyNameIsMud said:A benefit of Publisher's club has always been an early look at changes. They were given the same ability to toggle the forum layout as you, just a week earlier as they've been promised. While these changes didn't come with a heads up, they did come with the a toggle that's easily accessible.MelasZepheos said:snip
Also, and I know you probably didn't mean it offensively, but I find people using the word 'derp' in relation to my posts very dismissive. The connotatiosn of the word always makes it read to me as though everything I have just written has been dismissed as stupid/retarded. Not looking to offend, I just have a strong reaction to that word.
Sorry about that. But I hope I'm not the only person getting warned about it, there are a lot of posts in this thread that aren't on topic and it was derailed long before I got here :/Nasrin said:This post is not in any way on topic.Kungfu_Teddybear said:Yep, I have to agree. Daystar is in no way egotistical, and thinking otherwise is ridiculous. He's popular because he's an awesome guy, he's witty and he makes people laugh. End of story.Hazy992 said:His ego? Are we talking about the same Daystar Clarion here? Daystar's repeatedly said he doesn't want people holding him in such high regard and he doesn't like the idea of forum celebrities. He's one of the most modest people on this site. You're just hating him for being popular, it's not his fault people like him.ToastiestZombie said:I don't know really. I think it maybe the fact that people hold him in high acclaim, even when he let's his ego get the better of him. For example the brovengers thread had no discussion value whatsoever, but people were fine with it because it was a daystar thread. I just don't like celebrities and favouritism in any site, so of course daystar gets on my nerves but he is one funny lad, so I don't hate him that much.Hazy992 said:Fair enough. It's just people might take it personally even if you don't mean it to be taken that way.ToastiestZombie said:I take that back, I do kind of have something with daystar that bugs me. But now is not the time to speak about it. O would go edit mynpost, but I'm on this damn iPod an doing that would be a pain.
EDIT: Think you could make people's titles slightly bigger? I think that'd look better
EDIT 2: What actually is it about Daystar that bugs you so much?
As for the Brovengers thread it did have discussion value as a forum game which is why it was moved there. If this favouritism you keep claiming exists actually does exist the mods wouldn't have moved it.
Also, Hazy, I'm the most modest person on this site. That is why I am The Modest Brovenger. I'm so modest it hurts.
This thread exists for feedback about the changes to the forum's design. Please allow people to use it for that.
Try using the custom content background option in the browsing options (also the gear on the navbar).azurine said:Why is it that every "upgrade" makes the escapist harder and harder to see?
This is giving me an eyestrain, it's so white and bland.