Fox News Good Reporting?????

[Oo Rev oO]

This is why America is great. Right-wingers and left-wingers yelling at each other. A beautiful sound. But whether you like it or not FOX is the highest rated 24 hour cable news channel (by number of viewers) in the world, that is undebatable.

 

[Oo Rev oO]

[...]and I HATE! how he is going around saying sorry to every fucking country for America. It just showing weakness Imo. Did any other country say sorry for when the did something bad? hell no.

Y'know, sometimes I wonder if the prejudice of Americans not knowing jack shit about the rest of the world may be true.

For this last sentence, let me tell you, as a German, coming from a country that does nearly nothing else but apologize for something that happened 60 years ago, that I am deeply offended by your lack of knowledge about history and international politics, and that you, sir, are quite literally full of shit.

Thank you.

To the rest of the Americans here: This man and others like him is one of the reasons why anti-american sentiment is relatively strong today. At least with those who don't belong to some fundamentalist cadre.

so...you hate me because I just call your country out for doing something terrible? when I know it wasn't everyone fault and it was just a mad power dick of a leader? Really, all I said was their are more people who did terrible things then what we did. yes we attack a country we shouldn't have been in, but to say

1) we were piss that we were attack. I assume any country would be if this happen to them.
2) Bush acted out of to protect the country, since he heard that they COULD BE weapons there. I assume anyone would take the chance and look. Since in number one, we were attack and we wanted to get back at them.
3) We took out a dictator. Why should we be sorry about that? we free people from a evil man who most likely treated them like crap like any other dictator.
4)I stated if any country that did something wrong and said sorry, I said show me. You did not. So why should we say sorry when we just free a part of the middle east from a evil dictator?

Right on

 

[RobotNinja]

Feh, Fox is too right and CNN n NBC are too left. Watch the BBC if you want news...

This is very true. BBC is very reliable and unbiased. Both Fox and CNN are untrustworthy.

 

[ReincarnatedFTP]

Fox News isn't any more slanted than the other networks; in fact they're less slanted than the likes of MSNBC. The main point of contention that people (including the ones complaining in this thread) have is that they're conservative.

See, you can be as biased as you want, but being conservative? That deserves crucifixion.

No, it's just that Fox is so far right they think that all other media is "the librulz media out to get us".

And putting a (D) next to a Republican's name after they're caught in a scandal, and winning the right to lie (that's what it boils down to anyway) in court is not just conservative. It's propaganda.

 

[deleted_scifidownbeat]

DELETED

 

[Megacherv]

Feh, Fox is too right and CNN n NBC are too left. Watch the BBC if you want news...

Does Amaerica get the BBC?

 

[thebobmaster_v1legacy]

Fox News is the only cable news networks that actually shows both sides of the story. Although they are admittedly tilted to the right, each show has equal representation by both the left and the right...as is their policy. Whereas if one were to watch MSNBC that individual (if not in a coma) will notice that MSNBC commentators AND guests have an agenda for the left to succeed. Just look at who owns the company Jeffery Immelt, he is LITERALLY on Obama's payroll as he is an economic advisor (I wouldn't have him manage anything considering that GE stock has fallen over 20% more that the rest of the economy since he became the CEO). Oh and do any of you who watch MSNBC know who Van Jones is? No? I didn't think so. It's not like the Green Jobs Czar matters...even if he is an admitted Communist and believes that humans should be forcibly sterilized in order to control the Earth's population. As far as CNN really they aren't terrible. Reasonably tilted to the left but that's fine...after all discourse is what makes America great.

QFT. Fox news isn't the best, but they take both sides of the story. Like in the game thing that happen a while back. I didn't see anything wrong with it. It took both sides, one a woman who hates games and didn't have a clue, and the other was the guy who knew what he was talking about.

Of course, they kept cutting off the man who knew what he was talking about. Fox News: Representing Both Sides of the Story, But Cutting Off Anyone We Disagree With.

Feh, Fox is too right and CNN n NBC are too left. Watch the BBC if you want news...

Does Amaerica get the BBC?

I get BBC with Comcast Digital Cable. Not sure about the other companies.

 

[Sulu]

England's a lot less densely populated than America, and it would therefore take far longer.

Say what? The United Kingdom has a population of 61 million and a land area of 94,526 sq mi giving it a population density of 637/sq mi. The USA population of around 300 million and a land area of 3,794,066 sq mi giving it a density og 80/sq mi. Nah, the UK is very much more densely populated - the most densely populated in Europe.

 

[yossarian787]

for informative news, you should watch PBS: Public Broadcasting Station. My family switched to PBS after the first solid week of non-stop Michael Jackson coverage, wanting to know what was actually happening in, say, Afghanistan. It's amazing; completely different coverage from what you get on the "News Networks." They had a couple small segments a few weeks ago in which they interviewed Senators, one Republican and one Democrat, both of whom were actually involved in forming the health-care bill, and they gave both senators plenty of time to state their opinion of the bill as it was, and what they should do to make it better.

I haven't checked for a few days... are the other networks still on Michael's death?

 

[axia777]

CNN are untrustworthy.

How is CNN untrustworthy? What do they say that are lies?

 

[Debatra]

for informative news, you should watch PBS: Public Broadcasting Station. My family switched to PBS after the first solid week of non-stop Michael Jackson coverage, wanting to know what was actually happening in, say, Afghanistan. It's amazing; completely different coverage from what you get on the "News Networks." They had a couple small segments a few weeks ago in which they interviewed Senators, one Republican and one Democrat, both of whom were actually involved in forming the health-care bill, and they gave both senators plenty of time to state their opinion of the bill as it was, and what they should do to make it better.

I haven't checked for a few days... are the other networks still on Michael's death?

It get's an occasional mention. It was ruled a homicide.

 

[deleted_scifidownbeat]

DELETED

 

[Deleted]

If I knew what these right wing left wing nonsense means I'd be a very grouchy guy. So I'm not going to know, what Ican tell you though is that Fox has a bunch of liars on that show. I swear theres no credentials to get on just show them a paper that looks like a college dregree is Super Hard Physichemiengilab shit.

 

[Crimsane]

1) we were piss that we were attack. I assume any country would be if this happen to them.
2) Bush acted out of to protect the country, since he heard that they COULD BE weapons there. I assume anyone would take the chance and look. Since in number one, we were attack and we wanted to get back at them.
3) We took out a dictator. Why should we be sorry about that? we free people from a evil man who most likely treated them like crap like any other dictator.
4)I stated if any country that did something wrong and said sorry, I said show me. You did not. So why should we say sorry when we just free a part of the middle east from a evil dictator?

1) Yeah, no shit they'd be angry. They typically don't go invade others without solid proof that the perpetrators were actually from that country, though. That's just stupid.
2) Yeah, because if they did have WMDs, the smartest thing to do is to pull out the inspectors who could prove this peacefully, then invade and give them a reason to use them, right?
3) Sure, then pulled out of the region without stabilizing it properly, leaving a power vacuum and sparking civil war.
4) He did, note the German comment. Also, sure, don't say sorry for invading without any real proof to back up your accusations and killing thousands. They're surely not angry about that.

 

[Shaoken]

He right. Obama preacher did say how America is awful and all the "white" Americans are racists.

So....his preacher says something and you automatically take it as gospel for Obama's Opinions. Right so if one of your teachers thinks women shouldn't be allowed to vote I'd be perfectly fine in taking it as your opinion? Gotcha.

All I can say is, if you don't like America, that is fine, but don't live here if you hate it. Go somewhere else.

What a testament to the American solution to things; if something is broke, just abandoned it and find something else./sarcasm

See these people you hate are merely listing the flaws in your country and trying to fix it.

and I HATE! how he is going around saying sorry to every fucking country for America. It just showing weakness Imo.

That's because you're a moron. See Obama apologising all the time has made other countries start to like you morons again. Bush went around for eight years with a baseball bat fucking everything up and Obama's the guy who has to go around apologising to everyone who had something broken.

And to not apologise for ones misdeeds IS a sign of weakness; because you don't have the moral fortitude or personal integrity to admit your wrong-doings.

Did any other country say sorry for when the did something bad? hell no.

See, five minutes of research could have proven you wrong here. Hell the Australian government apologised to the indeginious population over something that happened back in the 30s.

 

[Oo Rev oO]

Fox News is the only cable news networks that actually shows both sides of the story. Although they are admittedly tilted to the right, each show has equal representation by both the left and the right...as is their policy. Whereas if one were to watch MSNBC that individual (if not in a coma) will notice that MSNBC commentators AND guests have an agenda for the left to succeed. Just look at who owns the company Jeffery Immelt, he is LITERALLY on Obama's payroll as he is an economic advisor (I wouldn't have him manage anything considering that GE stock has fallen over 20% more that the rest of the economy since he became the CEO). Oh and do any of you who watch MSNBC know who Van Jones is? No? I didn't think so. It's not like the Green Jobs Czar matters...even if he is an admitted Communist and believes that humans should be forcibly sterilized in order to control the Earth's population. As far as CNN really they aren't terrible. Reasonably tilted to the left but that's fine...after all discourse is what makes America great.

QFT. Fox news isn't the best, but they take both sides of the story. Like in the game thing that happen a while back. I didn't see anything wrong with it. It took both sides, one a woman who hates games and didn't have a clue, and the other was the guy who knew what he was talking about.

Of course, they kept cutting off the man who knew what he was talking about. Fox News: Representing Both Sides of the Story, But Cutting Off Anyone We Disagree With.

I think you're referring to commentator Bill O'Reilly...he cuts of everyone not just people he disagrees with