DanDeFool said:
Somehow, I think there would be discrimination even within the furrified faction. After all, if you got your genes spliced with, say, a tortoise, or an iguana, that would definitely be a much bigger change than getting spliced with some kind of mammal's genome. I can imagine there being a great deal of infighting between the lizard-people and the non-primate-mammal people.
Or do reptilian hybrids not count as "furries", on account of the fact that they're not "furry"? I don't really get how broadly furdom is supposed to be defined.
Even amongst the furries we have now, there is discrimination, such as some furs think its wrong to be a fictional or mythological animal. I know, its sad.
And someone called CM156 a troll. I wish to dispute this claim. No offense to CM, I would he / she is misinformed, but has every right to dislike the idea of furry. Yiff is the wrong thing to look up, just like the website is going to be horribly biased and also filled with misinformation. But a troll, no sir. I wouldnt hesitate to say from what I read, CM is a more understanding hater, as it were. Such as, isnt going to go searching for somewhere to spread fur hate, but would also prefer it wasnt up in his/her face either.
Also, as far as me being bias, CM, I am a con going suit wearing full fledged fur, 100%. I don't mind who knows, and everyone I know thinks its odd and interesting, so I wasnt trying to be unbiased.
And to furs who are arguing, lets face it, a large majority of fur art is porn.. which is annoying, but it is a representation where one outside of the community would get their views.
OT: Question for poster, as it has been mentioned a couple of times, but I dont know if it was addressed or if I missed it, but, what about offspring, would post serum have potential of producing progeny?
