Game Dogs: Pilot Episode: D&D Kills

Recommended Videos

HT_Black

New member
May 1, 2009
2,845
0
0
What can I say that hasn't already been said? It works, plain and simple. If nothing else, it started off a lot better than the majority of shows on here, so...yeah.
 

Telperion

Storyteller
Apr 17, 2008
432
0
0
100 xp for effort, 5 xp for implementation, 5 xp for uploading into the Escapist.
Right, now you just need another 890xp to reach level 2.

Anyway, I thought this first episode was (to quote another site) Some Old Bulls***!

I grew up in the early 90s reading stuff in a national newspaper about how D&D makes teenagers a) attack the elderly with sharp implements, b) join satanic cults, c) become dangerous anarchists, d) all of the above.

All of these "facts" were corrected years later by the same newspaper, but I remember the days when a lot of folks actually thought the newspaper had it right. After all: it was in the newspaper, so how could it not be true?

This whole episode made me feel angry.
 

Nazulu

They will not take our Fluids
Jun 5, 2008
6,242
0
0
Average. I will check out some others to see if it improves.
 

DarkSaber

New member
Dec 22, 2007
476
0
0
I wish I could rewind my brain and record over the part of my memory this dross is now stored in.

I want those minutes of my life back.

Signed
Someone who, as a 26 year old, is aparrently the target demographic for this horseshit. This fact offends me.
 

shark attack

New member
Oct 3, 2009
8
0
0
John Funk said:
shark attack said:
John Funk said:
Chipperz said:
I... Still don't know why these things couldn't be humans. Either it goes the way of this week's episode where the word "dog" is put in places it doesn't need to go and they talk about "the Jack Russel up North", or it's barely mentioned at all and it's pointless.

Meh, I guess I'm just not the biggest anthropomorphic animal fan. Except for turtles skilled in ninjitsu.
Why does Scrooge McDuck need to be a duck?? Why can't he be a really rich dude?

Man, I hated watching Goofy - they'd have been much better if they were people. And Mickey Mouse should have just been a human! A bear flying an airplane? That'd never work!

HE SHOULD HAVE BEEN A HUMAN WITH SQUARE PANTS!
Because those shows were aimed at small children, and colourful animals will hold a child's attention better than a human.

You're saying the actual intended audience for Game Dogs is children below the age of ten?
Sorry, that doesn't fly with me. Things aimed at children can still be popular with adults and have adult humor.

The intended audience for Game Dogs is people who were children in the 80s and 90s and who grew up with shows like that. We have fond memories of all those shows, and I'm betting you do too.
I have fond memories of the characters because of nostalgia, because they were a part of my childhood and something I enjoyed when I was younger. Just because a child enjoyed watching a colourful bunny hit things with hammers doesn't mean that when they grow up they will enjoy that same bunny making snarky one-liners in a cartoon office.

If Game Dogs is stylistically trying to copy old 80s and 90s cartoons, why don't the characters have the more exaggerated cartoon anatomy and facial structures that were everywhere at the time? Big eyes, wobbly arms, round tummies, big mouths, etcetera. The characters in this animation are shaped like just a bunch of humans in dog costumes; they look like they've jumped right out of a lame webcomic. Some more surreal and cartoony designs would have made the whole "they're dogs for nostalgia value!" a lot easier to swallow, AND would have made the show more visually appealing.
 

Nimbus

Token Irish Guy
Oct 22, 2008
2,162
0
0
Nice. I still think the premise kind of sucks, but the writing and animation is good.

It was kind of short though. Not enough time for anything to really happen.
 

BGH122

New member
Jun 11, 2008
1,307
0
0
Furburt said:
I didn't laugh once, or even giggle. Jolly poor show chaps. I definitely won't be watching again anyway.

Theme song was great though.
Agreed, well, I agree that it sucked.

However, I thought the theme song sucked too.

Clearly this wasn't my cup of tea.

shark attack said:
If Game Dogs is stylistically trying to copy old 80s and 90s cartoons, why don't the characters have the more exaggerated cartoon anatomy and facial structures that were everywhere at the time? Big eyes, wobbly arms, round tummies, big mouths, etcetera. The characters in this animation are shaped like just a bunch of humans in dog costumes; they look like they've jumped right out of a lame webcomic. Some more surreal and cartoony designs would have made the whole "they're dogs for nostalgia value!" a lot easier to swallow, AND would have made the show more visually appealing.
Yeah I too am having a tough time seeing the reason that they're dogs. It seems to me like the creators saw this famous picture below and just thought, "Oh. My. God. Dogs playing human games? But dog no can play human game! Funnee!1":

 

Bagaloo

New member
Sep 17, 2008
788
0
0
I feel the animation lets it down.
They way that the little dog with the tie just jumped onto the table when he came in, character movements and the way that the mouths didn't even vaguely match up to when something was being said by a character.

Though the script and the concept seemed solid enough. Still, early days yet.
 

HK_01

New member
Jun 1, 2009
1,610
0
0
No offense, but I didn't like this at all. I'll watch the next couple of episodes to see if it gets better though.

By the way, did you get the one who does the voice for Cuddles in Apocalypse Lane to voice Gary?
 

Cherry Cola

Your daddy, your Rock'n'Rolla
Jun 26, 2009
11,940
0
0
John Funk said:
Chipperz said:
I... Still don't know why these things couldn't be humans. Either it goes the way of this week's episode where the word "dog" is put in places it doesn't need to go and they talk about "the Jack Russel up North", or it's barely mentioned at all and it's pointless.

Meh, I guess I'm just not the biggest anthropomorphic animal fan. Except for turtles skilled in ninjitsu.
Why does Scrooge McDuck need to be a duck?? Why can't he be a really rich dude?

Man, I hated watching Goofy - they'd have been much better if they were people. And Mickey Mouse should have just been a human! A bear flying an airplane? That'd never work!

HE SHOULD HAVE BEEN A HUMAN WITH SQUARE PANTS!
And once again we are reminded that you don't mess with the Funk.

Cause then the Funk will mess with you!

You could also make the argument that some of the greatest stories ever are fables.

Or that the Na'vi in avatar didn't need to be aliens, since they could just have been indians.

Actually, it seems kinda fun to defend this show.

I might get into it.
 

Geamo

New member
Aug 27, 2008
801
0
0
It seemed fairly good, I felt largely the same as with Apocalypse Lane, so here's hoping that it'll improve with time. Music was rather good though.

It did remind me of a dog-version of PvP (the webcomic) though.
 

WILLTHEALMIGHTY

New member
Aug 21, 2008
44
0
0
I cringed the whole time.

I know why people would like it, but to me this looks about as good as the other shows here other than Yahtzee, MovieBob and Unskippable. Not godawful, just not my cup of tea and definitely not original.

Voice acting's great though.
 

George Palmer

Halfro Representative
Feb 23, 2009
566
0
0
HK_01 said:
By the way, did you get the one who does the voice for Cuddles in Apocalypse Lane to voice Gary?
Nope. The person who does the voice of Gary is actually a woman named Francine Collins. She is a very talented voice actor and has a long list of credits. She has been doing VO/Character work for quite some time and is a total professional. One of the best character VO artists I have ever worked with!