Pinstar said:What game out there, old or new, would you say has the worst graphics and yet is enjoyable on its game-play factor alone.
My vote would be for SimCopter
The graphics were painful to look at. The buildings were heavily pixelated, which was readily apparent. The people's animations were choppy at best, and looked like Picaso paintings moving around at worst and the only thing that was 'well animated' was the helicopters themselves and even that is a stretch for the term 'well animated'
However the game was (for me) undeniably fun. You had to fly around to handle disasters as they cropped up, forcing you to plan ahead and prioritize to meet the maximum number of problem areas in the shortest time, all while keeping an eye on your fuel and cargo room. Not to mention long before GTA3 popularized the 'game music is the radio station of the vehicle you're riding in' idea, SimCopter did it beautifully, complete with fake commercials ripe with pure Maxis humor (before it was tainted by EA).
The icing on the cake was the ability to import existing Sim City 2000 games into Sim Copter and fly missions around a city of your own creation, which gave you a slightly deeper connection to the location you were flying around (and a slight jump start in getting familiar with the city's layout).
What other games out there would you guys say have gameplay goodness to spare but are NOT easy on the eyes?
YES! YES!Soulgaunt said:....Gauntletark Legacy!
I'm a bit bored.
You've got the console version don't you?tellmeimaninja said:For modern games: Fallout 3.
It is a really, really fun game. The textures are bland, the draw distance is quite low, the animations and lip-syncing are downright horrendous.
What was the ending?ghstman said:I've got two for you:
First - The Legend of Dragoon. Hot damn that game was awesome. How could something that was so much fun end up sucking so hard in the graphics department? Granted, it was the original PlayStation, but even compared to other games of it's time it was pretty bad. The voice acting was hilariously bad.
Second - Infinite Undiscovery. The actual graphics on this game were mind blowing, especially in the cut scenes. That doesn't excuse the voice acting though (or that god-awful rip off of an ending). Until I played this game, the worst dubbing I had seen was in "The Good The Bad and The Ugly" in that scene at the union camp by the bridge. That has now been beaten by a mile. Not to mention only the biggest cut scenes had voice acting. I can understand it probably takes up a lot of space on the disc, but come on! You're already on two discs, spread it out to a third and don't be so lazy! Bad dubbing is better than no dubbing, so why not put in the effort? Yet despite it all, there was something oddly hypnotic and awesome about this game.
Damn Ninjas, they're everywhere!Katana314 said:More recently I might say Mount and Blade. Character models are pretty low, and no one's face moves at all, but the environments themselves look okay; and the gameplay is generally considered very good by the people who get fairly into it.
That is true, I should have qualified it as "Bad graphics for their time"canadamus_prime said:Hey, retro games don't count because most of them had great graphics for their time!!