Nautical Honors Society said:
Excuse me? I made that note because people have a tendency to jump right into a thread without reading what the thread is about. I guess you haven't been here long enough, but threads with titles like these are made all the time and their contents are almost always different than you would imagine.
And my point was that they wouldn't "jump right into a thread" if said threads threads didn't intentionally have deceptive/inflammatory titles.
You posted "Gamers have terrible taste in music." A more appropriate title, considering the content, would be, "Do gamers have terrible taste in music?" which not only more accurately describes the contents of your post, but also only uses two extra letters and a question mark. Your post, after all, seems to be asking a question. Your title, by contrast, is making a definitive statement.
Here are a few other examples of relatively recent threads I've seen that also named themselves something inflammatory because A) they wanted more traffic or B) they were too stupid to name them properly.
1. Breast Implants For Women Should Be Banned
-This falls under 'B.'
2. Are Bionic Body Parts Wrong?
-Again, 'B.' OP was literally convinced that artificial limbs might lead to cyborg super-crime.
3. Should firearm training be mandatory in schools?
-Probably more A than B. OP thought that highschool kids should be taught about guns in a general sense, just in the same way Driver's Ed teaches them about cars, but never actually puts them behind the wheel. Of course, the 'B' part of that was firearms not being on the same level as cars in terms of usefulness, scarcity, etc.
4. So I just got expelled for smelling a girl's hair
-This had literally
nothing to do with the thread. OP was asking about what forum habits annoy people, and didn't get the irony of most posters saying "deceptive thread titles."
5. Bioware Fans Downvoting The Witcher 2 on Metacritic
-A more appropriate title would have been "One person who likes DA2 didn't like The Witcher 2."
6. Could pedophiles be equivical to homosexuals?
-Again, dumbass OP, making the slippery slope argument that since we
used to revile homosexuals and
currently revile pedophiles, we might be on the road to accepting pedophiles into society.
7. Microsoft Devastates Autistic Child By Labeling Him a Cheater
-Surprisingly, this was an Escapist article. The entire story hinged on Microsoft being both shit at their job and absolutely evil, and that a child would never cheat to get Gamerscore. Turns out OP was wrong on all accounts, and a quasi-retraction was posted later. But I guess this isn't so much a deceptive title as it is lousy journalism.
And the list goes on. Exaggeration, deception, and basic stupidity, all in roughly equal measures.
Nautical Honors Society said:
I honestly don't care if you judge me, my intentions where not to prevent something so inevitable. But I do find it a bit odd you would judge me for disagreeing with this "stereotype"?
I guess you missed the part where I said flat-out that you pulled the stereotype out of thin air. It's irrelevant whether or not I agree with your opinion when
you made up the issue in the first place.
Nautical Honors Society said:
Or are you judging me for making a title to attract a little attention to my thread? If so then get used to it buddy, that happens pretty much all the time here...and in life honestly.
So in other words, because other people do it, too, you're exempt from being judged for your own actions? Riiiiiiight.