Yeah Child's Play got $80.000 because of them...how terrible.Draech said:Oh yeah their intentions were good.xXxJessicaxXx said:I personally haven't seen any proof that those things happened yet and frankly if you think that the Retake Mass Effect guys were doing something intentionally bad by encouraging donations to children then I don't know what to say.Draech said:Yeah I mean there was no double message....xXxJessicaxXx said:I don't think anyone said that, it was actually:Draech said:Que DwightxXxJessicaxXx said:They aren't allowed to donate to charity remember, they might get accused of using it as a shield...Wulfclaw said:This is getting ridiculous. Those 1000 $ would be better spend on charity instead of entitled whining about the ending of a friggin GAME!
Get a grip, really!
FALSE!
They are not allowed to tie 2 messages together as if it was their charity, forcing the owners of said charity to answer for messages that they did not make.
They can still donate to charity. Just not say "Donate to charity to get the the ending changed"
'Show how much you didn't like it by donating to charity.'
Those evil fiends how dare they!
I mean its not like Child's play was bombarded with mails from people asking questions like "will we get the ending changed if we hit our goal" or just people wanting their money back when once they learned it wouldn't get them a new ending.
Yeah that didn't happen...
It wasn't as if the vague message of "retake Mass effect" was used to its full extent by a small group of people who never actually owned it to begin with.
Yeah.... they are the victims here...
The whole thing has been ridiculous. Even the first reaction of the guy I originally quoted was 'Why not give it to charity?' that's exactly the thought that the Retake Mass Effect guys had. They chose Child's Play because it's the obvious gamers choice.
I think they chose a bad name for their 'movement' but I think their intentions were good at the end of the day.
Thou misguided by a false sense of ownership so many fanboys seem to have. But they had good intentions. The people who want video games banned have good intentions. These guyes doesn't want the ending banned, just want it changed to fit their vision.
Doesn't make their actions any less stupid or the problems Child's Play got because of them any less real.
The endings were bad or lackluster, pretty much everyone who played the game agrees on that. Most people want the endings to be less vague. They don't even know what happened to the characters they have spent 5 years getting to know.
Having an opinion isn't stupid and most people are complaining because they love the series so much.
We wouldn't have the classic 'The Hound of the Baskervilles' if it wasn't for Arthur Conan Doyle's fans complaining about Sherlock Holmes getting killed off for example.
Listening to consumer feedback isn't a bad thing, when you don't listen you get what happened to Sonic the Hedgehog... Sonic Team have spent the last twenty years with their fingers in their ears going lalalalala and as a result have made their franchise a complete joke to most people. Only recently have they started listening and going back to what made Sonic great like Colours and Generations.