CounterStrike.
You'd think those assenine morons would eventually tire themselves out, but nooooo!
You'd think those assenine morons would eventually tire themselves out, but nooooo!
TheQFactor said:I hate jumping on the bandwagon, but I'd have to say Halo and Portal. I think Halo's just an average game itself (although playing with friends online makes it fun) but the fanboys just ruin it for me. As for Portal...
OK, it was a good game. Short, but funny, and entertaining. But, come ON! How many times has someone shouted "THE CAKE IS A LIE!" on the internets. And that stupid song... PC Gamer friggin' gave Portal "Best Soundtrack of 2007!" Just glad I canceled my subscription to that piece of crap.
Same here xD When I'm alone I play serious, but not elitist.. I don't care if a person gets 2 kills and 20 deaths as long as he's trying and isn't just TKing or being a douche.MasterExploder said:Well, I'm going to go out on a limb and say when I'm with my friends we act like complete douchebags. We find the stupidest stuff funny and screwing around on xbox live is just another joke. I find it accepted like that because we're having fun and we're not really serious. It's when people who are obviously alone in there house start yelling at you cause you cant go 40 and 1 in team deathmatch that really pisses me off.
Games I think have been ruined: Portal, Halo, WoW, SSBM
I go there and i know exactly what you mean.the_carrot said:If you want to see a game get ruined by it's fans. Come to the Team Fortress 2 forums on Steampowered.com and just wait for the griping to commence, if the front page isn't littered with threads about nerfing this or buffing that to begin with. They, I don't want to say cater, but respond to a lot of people's comments, and sadly the most vocal aren't necessarily the best judges. It seems like it's going downhill fairly fast...
Yeah. I call that BoTS Syndrome. I imagine it's been around since before that mod, but that's what I call it. I don't know if any of you have played Quake 2 or Quake 3 Battle of the Sexes or not, but there was this guy that made it who had it perfectly balanced for both games, and then he gave up on Q3 BoTS one day. His reason was because he was sick and tired of everyone complaining about how their class was nerfed or "My sniper rifle isn't fully automatic." So, he released the source files to the mod and said that he would no longer work on the mod because of all the complaints. So, since then, anytime I hear of a similar event, I call it BoTS Syndrome.Bishop99999999 said:Dood, I got killed when a sniper shot me in the head! FIZ PLZ!!!Raan_Amano said:Are you refering to players complaining about the way developers balanced things, so they get all upset and complain until the developers change it?
Hes arnold, arnold, arnold rimmer, more reliable than a garden strimmer.Xaositect said:Most FPS games I would say. I personally think FPS fans are the orcs of the video gaming culture. I think if games like Halo arent given stellar reviews (when they are in many areas pretty mediocre), then it will unite the warring fanbios, and they will engulf the world in a green tide of bitching fanbois and their cries of l33t speak. Plus playing online is to basically be washed away in a sea of juvenile stupidity.
The Elder Scrolls would be another one. I remember playing Morrowind and being absolutely smitten, and then over time, as more and more information came about on Oblivion, the levels of stupid posters at the forums began to grow. While not a complete loss, since it only naturally would surpass Morrowind in many areas, I still consider Oblivion the inferior game in my own opinion. While not entirely the "new" fans fault, I do blame them a little.
Also, though it might not be relevant, I have for a long time considered Final Fantasy games to be the reality TV of the gaming industry. I add Zelda to it as well, as its a stagnant beast that needs to die, yet lumbers on top of the backs of the fans who dont seem to care about how 2 dimensional the entire thing has become. I also failed to recognise the magic in Mario Galaxy. It wasnt bad by any means, but I just dont see why people say its THAT good? Just like with COD4, but I think Im biased there, as I wouldnt piss on the COD franchise, or Medal of Honor, if they were on fire. I dont see them as any different than the year after year sports sims (with COD4 finally stepping into a new area).
I agree with you on every point but one. While it is true that it does attract people from every demographic (slacker collegiate here) it is possible to "get through" the game without encountering any of these people, or if you do, effectively ignoring them. I suppose the game can be an acquired taste, and I may be alone in saying this; but i have yet to have had a problem that ruins the game experience by running into the people from those other demographics.DkSeraph said:i respect that you disliked the game, but if you only played it for 5 minutes, then you're not really qualified to pass an objective criticism of the game. that's like seeing the first 5 minutes of a movie and saying it sucked. How much could you really experienced in those 5 minutes. A level one character is -by their very nature- limited in scope. Once you level, more options are available to you. At level 70, you have a vast array of abilities to fight with, moeso than any FPS (with rare exceptions: System Shock 2, BioSchock, Deus Ex .. see a pattern?).PurpleRain said:I played it for 5 minutes. I love the undead so I decieded to make an undead necromancer kinda guy. Looked a little bit cool. So I ventured out into the world. A friend taught me the confusing mission questing thingy. I thought it was kinda stupid but the quest I got was to go out and kill some kind of undead creature. I fought them for a little bit. Got bored sickly. Turned off the game. The fans didn't ruin the game, it ruined itself. The fans are the only ones who enjoy it. I like games like FPS's where I get full desisions and control in my attacks, not right click on them. That was pretty pointless. Everything in that game felt so off.Sib said:World of Warcraft
Regardless, this is true of any game: you start Half-life and get a crowbar, play Command & Conquer and get a handful of buildings and 4 units. all games are based upon progressively enlarging abilities..
The same could be said for simplicity. Only truly innovative games break any molds. FPS games basically involve walking down a halfway, shooting monsters and picking up upgrades. RTS games involve building bases, raising armies and conquering territory. Nothing is truly new or innovative in either of those genres, mechanics wise. What makes games fun are the storylines, graphic innovations or the occasional leap in gameplay.
That all being said:
World of Warcraft, clearly ruined by the same mechanism that made it so damned popular: it's simplicity. We have a great storyline with some truly moving characters. We have a gameplay mechanic that is not nearly as unforgiving and far more balanced than EQ ever was (and it was brutal). Yet any monkey with a mutated opposable thumb can play this game, so the flood gates of cash and annoying, annoying juvenile delinquents were open. In previous games, you could be fairly certain that a specific level of commitment equated to a similarity of lifestyle. Not so in WoW. You have working adults and slacker collegiates and ass-breathing teens all together in one giant orgy of annoyance.
It's like every annoying stereotype from every multiplayer game in existence all wrapped up into one condensed demographic.
I don't know, I quite enjoyed Earth and Beyond.Peregrinus said:I wouldn't say 'ruined'. They're good games, but half the posts from sites like 'No Mutants Allowed" makes me want to phsysically vomit.Cameoflage said:Fallout.
That aside, I personally feel that every single MMORPG in the history of time deserves mention here. Except for Seed. Seed was awesome for the whole week it lasted.
Halo 3 was vastly better than Halo 2. I'm surprised you didn't find people who agree with you. Halo 2's multiplayer, imo, depended too much on chances. It turned into a sort of Call of Duty game. If you get the jump on someone, you will almost always win, despite what your skill level is. Iono, I just didn't like Halo 2.ComradeJim270 said:Also... a bit off topic... am I the only one who thought Halo 3 was vastly better than Halo 2 in every way (Ok, not in every way, it didn't have enough Arbiter-y goodness for my taste)?