Games you wanna see remade in HD, because they're awesomenessesses

Recommended Videos

Canadamus Prime

Robot in Disguise
Jun 17, 2009
14,334
0
0
None, because the HD experience is lost on me.
aba1 said:
Why is everyone naming games from the last gen? most of those games dont really need a graphical update.
That's what I'd love to know. I don't get the big obsession with HD. When I finally got my Xbox360 going in HD I was severely underwhelmed.
 

Andy Shandy

Fucked if I know
Jun 7, 2010
4,797
0
0
Twuk said:
Since Konami are going as far as to touch up the MGS series, I don't see any harm in upscaling the Zone of the Enders series as well. The controls would feel fabulous on a Dual Shock 3.
I believe that they announced that both Zone Of The Enders are getting HD remakes much like MGS, as well as Silent Hill.

As far myself, I'm not 100% sure. I worry that they'll end up changing things besides the graphics and then it becomes a different experience to the one I loved so much.
 

otakon17

New member
Jun 21, 2010
1,338
0
0
Skies of Arcadia. The game had a great aesthetic to it and I'd love to actually be able to play the damn thing on a living system.
ciancon said:
Radeonx said:
Okami. The art direction/style was great, and an HD version would be gorgeous.
Ninjas......damn.
Yes, indeed. Someone mentioned it already, but Star Wars: Knights of the Old Republic too. God, I'd pay out the wazoo for an HD release of that with all the bugs ironed out.
 

aba1

New member
Mar 18, 2010
3,248
0
0
canadamus_prime said:
None, because the HD experience is lost on me.
aba1 said:
Why is everyone naming games from the last gen? most of those games dont really need a graphical update.
That's what I'd love to know. I don't get the big obsession with HD. When I finally got my Xbox360 going in HD I was severely underwhelmed.
I see the point but more for games from the n64 or Ps1 because a graphical update is actually a significant thing but as far as the cube and ps2 and xbox go the graphics really aren't that bad they only one gen ago and still look plenty decent.
 

Canadamus Prime

Robot in Disguise
Jun 17, 2009
14,334
0
0
aba1 said:
canadamus_prime said:
None, because the HD experience is lost on me.
aba1 said:
Why is everyone naming games from the last gen? most of those games dont really need a graphical update.
That's what I'd love to know. I don't get the big obsession with HD. When I finally got my Xbox360 going in HD I was severely underwhelmed.
I see the point but more for games from the n64 or Ps1 because a graphical update is actually a significant thing but as far as the cube and ps2 and xbox go the graphics really aren't that bad they only one gen ago and still look plenty decent.
Well as I said, the HD experience is lost on me, but if we picking games to rerelease/remake at least pick ones that are 2-3 generations old. The previous gen's games can still hold their own, except for the whole HD thing which I've already stated is pretty underwhelming. Certainly not worth remaking a game that's only 1 gen old for because that's about all you'd be adding to it. And from a developers point of view it can't be worth the time or money.
 

Deef

New member
Mar 11, 2009
1,252
0
0
TimeSplitters. Any of them really, although I'd prefer Future Perfect. I just want a TimeSplitters I can play on a next gen console damn it.
 

HazelrahFiver

New member
Oct 12, 2009
86
0
0
aba1 said:
Why is everyone naming games from the last gen? most of those games dont really need a graphical update.
Agreed! With that said, Fallout 3.

Kidding!

I'd love the first 3 King's Field games to be remade (all three for the PS1, the first of which was not released in the U.S.)
Final Fantasy 1-7 as well. 8 sucks and 9 and up are good enough that they don't need a remake (especially since 10 and onward are for the PS2). 7 would mean the most to me, and I still can't believe that they haven't done this. It baffles me. I mean, it would cost a lot initially, but then EVERYONE would purchase it, and for full price even.