They're supposed to be targeting everyone with this release, so he'd be pretty much looking at the same price for newer gen. I'm not entirely sure when bulldozer is supposed to come out, but I do know that sandy bridge is just a couple of weeks away, so unless he absolutely needs a computer right now or has an incredible deal somewhere it would be wise to wait, if anything to see if there's a price drop on everything else when this gets released.MercurySteam said:Don't you think that Sandy Bridge is a bit overkill if he's only aiming for AMD's Phenom II X4 processors? And AMD's Bulldozer chips will be something to marvel at.Sleifer said:I would without a doubt wait a couple of weeks for intel's sandy bridge to come out before I'd even think about building a computer right now.
This link might helpMaster Steeds said:this is very helpful, thank you, but i just looked at the GTX 460 and i found the 1 GB for £181 and the 2GB one for £185??? is there something wrong here?
Just as I thought. The performance increase is fairly minimal and by the time you need to even go near 2GB you may as well move onto a higher series of cards. If you really want 2GB then by all means, go ahead.Danceofmasks said:This link might helpMaster Steeds said:this is very helpful, thank you, but i just looked at the GTX 460 and i found the 1 GB for £181 and the 2GB one for £185??? is there something wrong here?
http://benchmarkextreme.com/Articles/GTX%20460%20ANALYSIS/P1.html
I guess lower capacity SSD don't exist for the budget PC gamer.MercurySteam said:You do realize that 480GB SSD are about $1500? Talk about diminishing returns on the hugest FUCKING scale ever.DTWolfwood said:Get a 320GB or larger Solid State HDD if you're serious about gaming.
I always thought that since dedicated GPU's had their own dedicated RAM, they aren't affected by the limitations of 32-Bit Operating Systems.Danceofmasks said:The only problem with getting 2GB if the price is $5 apart is using a 32 bit operating system.
'cos the 4GB limit on memory addresses includes both system and video RAM ...
MercurySteam said:I always thought that since dedicated GPU's had their own dedicated RAM, they aren't affected by the limitations of 32-Bit Operating Systems.Danceofmasks said:The only problem with getting 2GB if the price is $5 apart is using a 32 bit operating system.
'cos the 4GB limit on memory addresses includes both system and video RAM ...
SSD's start at 60GB for $150. This is good if you want to load your OS and a few programs onto it and then buy a 1TB SATA drive for everything else. SSD's aren't at a point where any gamer can store their all their games for a good price. I see SSDs as good products for people with issues with mechanical HDDs (mainly me). The speeds are good but the storage is incredibly small for unreasonable prices, though they maintain unrivaled reliability with a lack of moving parts.DTWolfwood said:I guess lower capacity SSD don't exist for the budget PC gamer.MercurySteam said:You do realize that 480GB SSD are about $1500? Talk about diminishing returns on the hugest FUCKING scale ever.DTWolfwood said:Get a 320GB or larger Solid State HDD if you're serious about gaming.
here i thought i was speaking to filthy rich european whose looking to upgrade an already good gaming PC.
It's 3 AM here and I'm not really getting this. I always thought DDR2/3 operated separately to GDDR3/4/5.Danceofmasks said:MercurySteam said:I always thought that since dedicated GPU's had their own dedicated RAM, they aren't affected by the limitations of 32-Bit Operating Systems.Danceofmasks said:The only problem with getting 2GB if the price is $5 apart is using a 32 bit operating system.
'cos the 4GB limit on memory addresses includes both system and video RAM ...
Note that Physical Address Extension allowed more RAM to be accessible, at the cost of performance. Not recommended.
From Microsoft's site:
How graphics cards and other devices affect memory limits
Devices have to map their memory below 4 GB for compatibility with non-PAE-aware Windows releases. Therefore, if the system has 4GB of RAM, some of it is either disabled or is remapped above 4GB by the BIOS. If the memory is remapped, X64 Windows can use this memory. X86 client versions of Windows don?t support physical memory above the 4GB mark, so they can?t access these remapped regions. Any X64 Windows or X86 Server release can.
X86 client versions with PAE enabled do have a usable 37-bit (128 GB) physical address space. The limit that these versions impose is the highest permitted physical RAM address, not the size of the IO space. That means PAE-aware drivers can actually use physical space above 4 GB if they want. For example, drivers could map the ?lost? memory regions located above 4 GB and expose this memory as a RAM disk.
Yeah, from my understanding, that extra unaddressed system RAM in a 32-bit system was used by the GPU. Not sure if that only applies to an integrated GPU or to dedicated as well. Even so, that's still effectively a 3.2GB limit on GPU memory and I think the amount needed has already been covered in this thread. lolMercurySteam said:I always thought that since dedicated GPU's had their own dedicated RAM, they aren't affected by the limitations of 32-Bit Operating Systems.Danceofmasks said:The only problem with getting 2GB if the price is $5 apart is using a 32 bit operating system.
'cos the 4GB limit on memory addresses includes both system and video RAM ...
The most fitting analogy is, it's like RAM have to have phone numbers so programs can call them.MercurySteam said:It's 3AM here and I'm not really getting this. I always thought DDR2/3 operated separately to GDDR3/4/5.Danceofmasks said:MercurySteam said:I always thought that since dedicated GPU's had their own dedicated RAM, they aren't affected by the limitations of 32-Bit Operating Systems.Danceofmasks said:The only problem with getting 2GB if the price is $5 apart is using a 32 bit operating system.
'cos the 4GB limit on memory addresses includes both system and video RAM ...
Note that Physical Address Extension allowed more RAM to be accessible, at the cost of performance. Not recommended.
From Microsoft's site:
How graphics cards and other devices affect memory limits
Devices have to map their memory below 4 GB for compatibility with non-PAE-aware Windows releases. Therefore, if the system has 4GB of RAM, some of it is either disabled or is remapped above 4GB by the BIOS. If the memory is remapped, X64 Windows can use this memory. X86 client versions of Windows don?t support physical memory above the 4GB mark, so they can?t access these remapped regions. Any X64 Windows or X86 Server release can.
X86 client versions with PAE enabled do have a usable 37-bit (128 GB) physical address space. The limit that these versions impose is the highest permitted physical RAM address, not the size of the IO space. That means PAE-aware drivers can actually use physical space above 4 GB if they want. For example, drivers could map the ?lost? memory regions located above 4 GB and expose this memory as a RAM disk.
Still worth it if he is serious about a gaming PC. just having it run the OS and the one game he plays all the time is well worth the performance boost.MercurySteam said:SSD's start at 60GB for $150. This is good if you want to load your OS and a few programs onto it and then buy a 1TB SATA drive for everything else. SSD's aren't at a point where any gamer can store their all their games for a good price. I see SSDs as good products for people with issues with mechanical HDDs (mainly me). The speeds are good but the storage is incredibly small for unreasonable prices, though they maintain unrivaled reliability with a lack of moving parts.DTWolfwood said:I guess lower capacity SSD don't exist for the budget PC gamer.MercurySteam said:You do realize that 480GB SSD are about $1500? Talk about diminishing returns on the hugest FUCKING scale ever.DTWolfwood said:Get a 320GB or larger Solid State HDD if you're serious about gaming.
here i thought i was speaking to filthy rich european whose looking to upgrade an already good gaming PC.
I actually have the same processor and motherboard model. Same amount of RAM and VRAM evenMaster Steeds said:hello guys, i know this asking a lot but i was wondering if maybe one of you could help me out here, im just wondering if this PC that im going to get will actually work and perform well.
im kind of new to this so please go easy on me
OK so i have built one that i believe should work and has all the parts (im hoping) plCPUease tell me if you notice i am forgeting something or if something will not work.
CPU: AMD Phenom II X4 970 Black Edition Quad Core CPU (AM3 Socket)
Motherboard: MSI 870A-G54 Socket Socket AM3 Motherboard
RAM: Kingston 4GB DDR3 1333MHz Non-ECC 240pin DIMM Memory Module
Graphics Card: Sapphire ATI Radeon HD 5450 1GB (not very good apparently)
Hard Drive: 2TB Seagate Barracuda XT SATA3 ( too big apparently)
Case - CCL Advantage Excel Barebone (will this case house this stuff?)
EDIT:
PSU: 900W Evo Labs 80+ ATX Power Supply (is 900W a bit excessive?)
Can you recommend any good Graphics cards and Hard Drives?
also someone mentioned having an external hard drive for backing stuff up, thought i should mention i have one already with 1 TB of space so im set there
also i am english so bear in mind some stuff may not be available here that may be available in the USA
If he plans to uninstall some of his games from the SSD every so often then yes, I see what you mean. Kinda like how most people with Xbox 360s will only install their newer games/the games they play the most on their hard drives. Still, in my opinion, the higher prices coupled with small storage space doesn't seem worth the extra money for slightly faster speeds.DTWolfwood said:Still worth it if he is serious about a gaming PC. just having it run the OS and the one game he plays all the time is well worth the performance boost.MercurySteam said:SSD's start at 60GB for $150. This is good if you want to load your OS and a few programs onto it and then buy a 1TB SATA drive for everything else. SSD's aren't at a point where any gamer can store their all their games for a good price. I see SSDs as good products for people with issues with mechanical HDDs (mainly me). The speeds are good but the storage is incredibly small for unreasonable prices, though they maintain unrivaled reliability with a lack of moving parts.DTWolfwood said:I guess lower capacity SSD don't exist for the budget PC gamer.MercurySteam said:You do realize that 480GB SSD are about $1500? Talk about diminishing returns on the hugest FUCKING scale ever.DTWolfwood said:Get a 320GB or larger Solid State HDD if you're serious about gaming.
here i thought i was speaking to filthy rich european whose looking to upgrade an already good gaming PC.
Thats y i prefer Digital Distribution platforms like Steam. Download & install all at the same time. Uninstalling is as ez as "Delete Local Content" (20mb/s connection+ also helps)MercurySteam said:If he plans to uninstall some of his games from the SSD every so often then yes...