I didn't say that's what socialism is. Seanchaidh is a communist.Weapons grade bad take on what socialism is.
I didn't say that's what socialism is. Seanchaidh is a communist.Weapons grade bad take on what socialism is.
Pelosi gets so much hate for how effective she is. She's extremely good at making things happen and passing legislation
I'm sure this has some dumb lefty meaning but you will have to spell it ou.... Cyberpunk just finshed decrypting so I'mma go do that.
Oh cool. Then it's an even worse take.I didn't say that's what socialism is. Seanchaidh is a communist.
I don't doubt she's effective, there's no way she would be in that position if she were not. What I question is whether people like Pelosi and McConnell govern for any reason than for the sake of governing. Essentially, the epitome of politicians who have long since become divorced from the country and the people, and are consumed with playing their own games of power. Such people are useful to the point of vital, but I'd rather they were the "fixers" - lieutenants of other people with a better sense of vision and purpose - than running the show themselves.Pelosi gets so much hate for how effective she is. She's extremely good at making things happen and passing legislation, but the left hates her for not being further left and the right hates/fears her for how effective she is/being too far left.
That begs the question, "effective at what?" The answer is fundraising. She's in that position because she feeds mountains of cash from California into the DNC.I don't doubt she's effective, there's no way she would be in that position if she were not.
Your response here doesn't even qualify as a take. You have no argument to make here.Oh cool. Then it's an even worse take.
Corporations have management hierarchies that answer to a board of directors appointed by shareholders; they do not "house power as close to the individual as possible" because each is its own private tyranny.a) Your conception of corporations is not accurate.
Oh yeah, and Republicans are really all about trustbusting these days.b) Outright socialism is not the only nor even the most effect solution to bloated corporations. It's not coincidence when trustbusting became a thing and from which party it came from.
I can certainly see that for turtle mitch since not only is he extremely partisan obstructionist but he also seems to be using his position to enrich himself while not actually doing work. Pelosi though, why do you think that? She seems to be doing a delicate balancing act between the more left wing and the more centrist members of her party who have to worry about being electorally viable in areas with more right wingers. Its fine being as left leaning as the squad is but they are in extremely safe districts, they don't lose in elections, they can only lose in primaries.I don't doubt she's effective, there's no way she would be in that position if she were not. What I question is whether people like Pelosi and McConnell govern for any reason than for the sake of governing. Essentially, the epitome of politicians who have long since become divorced from the country and the people, and are consumed with playing their own games of power. Such people are useful to the point of vital, but I'd rather they were the "fixers" - lieutenants of other people with a better sense of vision and purpose - than running the show themselves.
I can certainly see that for turtle mitch since not only is he extremely partisan obstructionist but he also seems to be using his position to enrich himself while not actually doing work. Pelosi though, why do you think that?
That begs the question, "effective at what?" The answer is fundraising. She's in that position because she feeds mountains of cash from California into the DNC.
Your response here doesn't even qualify as a take. You have no argument to make here.
I put in about as much effort as you did my dudeYou believe in a system where individuals are banned from having power
No you didnt. You didn't even stop to understand what I said.I put in about as much effort as you did my dude
So yeah, as much effort as you put into understanding communism.No you didnt. You didn't even stop to understand what I said.
So yeah, as much effort as you put into understanding communism.
The shitty state of the union?This election truly all comes down to one state.
Again, you have no argument. You're just picking a side with no real understanding of what it means, and are lashing out at me for being on the perceived opposite side.So yeah, as much effort as you put into understanding communism.
No, Cheetodust is just correct.Again, you have no argument. You're just picking a side with no real understanding of what it means, and are lashing out at me for being on the perceived opposite side.
You are also perfectly welcome to make an argument at any time. You choose not to.No, Cheetodust is just correct.