It's not just a practice thing.
It's a player pool thing.
See, let's say 1 in 1,000 players are good enough to play competitively.
Say, 1 in 10,000 players are good enough to hold their own against the best in the world.
Then, say 200,000 males play your game, and 10,000 females play your game.
Duh, of course the tournaments are going to be dominated by guys.
That's what people don't get about saying stuff like "men are better at X"
For the statistics to be worth a damn, you've got to take a sufficiently large sample size, and if your random sample of an equal number of each sex results in "skill levels are about equal" (and for most games the variation won't be statistically significant) it's irrelevant who gets on the leader boards.
It's a player pool thing.
See, let's say 1 in 1,000 players are good enough to play competitively.
Say, 1 in 10,000 players are good enough to hold their own against the best in the world.
Then, say 200,000 males play your game, and 10,000 females play your game.
Duh, of course the tournaments are going to be dominated by guys.
That's what people don't get about saying stuff like "men are better at X"
For the statistics to be worth a damn, you've got to take a sufficiently large sample size, and if your random sample of an equal number of each sex results in "skill levels are about equal" (and for most games the variation won't be statistically significant) it's irrelevant who gets on the leader boards.