Girl throws puppies in river.

[Ungenericteen]

If I ever find this ***** I will shove my(new) sword down her throat just so she can bleed out slowly enough to let her brain recap her crimes( or sins which ever you prefer).

 

[Teh Ty]

If I'm correct, 4chan should already be planning a raid or something.
What a horrid little girl.

 

[Orcus The Ultimate]

Some humans are like children, even when they grow up, and without a proper education, or morale, or some guidance, Shit Happens.

 

[Thamous]

i can't comment on this without first knowing more about the situation .. for all i know her parents ordered her to do it because the pet unintentionally got preggo and they couldn't afford to keep the pups .. no one else would take them and that was their final option

puppies are expensive and they require ALOT of attention .. more so than kittens .. it may be sad for us to witness (including me, i'm a huge dog lover, this video hurt me alot) but there might have been no other choice .. this is reality and i'll face it as an adult

Well, if they were so inadequate to care for them, why didn't they just hand them over to an animal shelter? And in the case of an accidental pregnancy, why didn't they have the dog spayed or neutered? And if those parents told her to do this then they could face some serious charges. (High fines and jail time.) That girl will likely be thrown into Juvenile Detention or sent to a Psychiatrist. (And neither are cheap.)

As for the expensiveness, puppies are a lot cheaper than you'd expect. Sure they require food, water, something to keep them entertained, but if you were to compare the expenses of a puppy to those of a single human child, you'd probably be surprised. Plus a dog ages 7x faster than a human so by the time it turns 14ish, that doggie will soon be gone forever. Unlike a human child that could stay with his or her parents a good 24 years before even thinking of moving out on their own.

So really, which was the costlier decision?

firsly, here in the UK psychiatric care is free ... spraying a dog ISN'T .. handing them in may require time and effort .. none of which they may of had

ok before i explain further .. let me first let you all know that i'm not trying to directly defend this girls actions .. i'm merelyn stating the possibilities for such actions ... many of you people seem to even take that personally ...

don't even compare a puppy to a human child .. of course these people would be more willing to take care of their child over puppies ... also .. YES a puppy is WAY cheaper to take care of than a human child ... but what if you could barely afford to care for a child .. the puppy would then be out of the question .. the nearest animal shelter may be a hundred or more miles away.

Yeah, we wouldn't won't people to have to go out of their way or anything. It's probably better they just toss the dogs in a river.

 

[Danpascooch]

Yeah it happens. It pissed me off too, but the world isn't a nice place. You can't do anything about it unless you want to track her down and /b/ is already trying. I say just let them handle it.

lol, not, let the cops handle it, no, let /b/ handle it.

Just awesome, JUSTICE!

Seriously though, why doesn't anyone believe this could be fake? After all, she seems to be throwing them unrealistically far.

 

[Danpascooch]

i can't comment on this without first knowing more about the situation .. for all i know her parents ordered her to do it because the pet unintentionally got preggo and they couldn't afford to keep the pups .. no one else would take them and that was their final option

puppies are expensive and they require ALOT of attention .. more so than kittens .. it may be sad for us to witness (including me, i'm a huge dog lover, this video hurt me alot) but there might have been no other choice .. this is reality and i'll face it as an adult

Well, if they were so inadequate to care for them, why didn't they just hand them over to an animal shelter? And in the case of an accidental pregnancy, why didn't they have the dog spayed or neutered? And if those parents told her to do this then they could face some serious charges. (High fines and jail time.) That girl will likely be thrown into Juvenile Detention or sent to a Psychiatrist. (And neither are cheap.)

As for the expensiveness, puppies are a lot cheaper than you'd expect. Sure they require food, water, something to keep them entertained, but if you were to compare the expenses of a puppy to those of a single human child, you'd probably be surprised. Plus a dog ages 7x faster than a human so by the time it turns 14ish, that doggie will soon be gone forever. Unlike a human child that could stay with his or her parents a good 24 years before even thinking of moving out on their own.

So really, which was the costlier decision?

firsly, here in the UK psychiatric care is free ... spraying a dog ISN'T .. handing them in may require time and effort .. none of which they may of had

ok before i explain further .. let me first let you all know that i'm not trying to directly defend this girls actions .. i'm merelyn stating the possibilities for such actions ... many of you people seem to even take that personally ...

don't even compare a puppy to a human child .. of course these people would be more willing to take care of their child over puppies ... also .. YES a puppy is WAY cheaper to take care of than a human child ... but what if you could barely afford to care for a child .. the puppy would then be out of the question .. the nearest animal shelter may be a hundred or more miles away.

Yeah, we wouldn't won't people to have to go out of their way or anything. It's probably better they just toss the dogs in a river.

Is this guy fucking kidding?

Not you, the guy you quoted

gee maybe they had no choice but to THROW THEM IN A RIVER? Jesus Christ, is he fucking serious? It's bad enough to abandon the puppies, what reason is there for THROWING THEM IN A RIVER!? THEY DIDN'T LOOK ON FIRE TO ME!

 

[MrJohnson]

Wayne Brady is going to HAVE to choke a ***** on this one.

This fucking **** will receive no sympathy from whatever the results of her actions are.

In this one case I believe a higher power will truly judge this women.

And the only higher power to judge is /b/.

Let justice be done.

 

[silversnake4133]

i can't comment on this without first knowing more about the situation .. for all i know her parents ordered her to do it because the pet unintentionally got preggo and they couldn't afford to keep the pups .. no one else would take them and that was their final option

puppies are expensive and they require ALOT of attention .. more so than kittens .. it may be sad for us to witness (including me, i'm a huge dog lover, this video hurt me alot) but there might have been no other choice .. this is reality and i'll face it as an adult

Well, if they were so inadequate to care for them, why didn't they just hand them over to an animal shelter? And in the case of an accidental pregnancy, why didn't they have the dog spayed or neutered? And if those parents told her to do this then they could face some serious charges. (High fines and jail time.) That girl will likely be thrown into Juvenile Detention or sent to a Psychiatrist. (And neither are cheap.)

As for the expensiveness, puppies are a lot cheaper than you'd expect. Sure they require food, water, something to keep them entertained, but if you were to compare the expenses of a puppy to those of a single human child, you'd probably be surprised. Plus a dog ages 7x faster than a human so by the time it turns 14ish, that doggie will soon be gone forever. Unlike a human child that could stay with his or her parents a good 24 years before even thinking of moving out on their own.

So really, which was the costlier decision?

firsly, here in the UK psychiatric care is free ... spraying a dog ISN'T .. handing them in may require time and effort .. none of which they may of had

ok before i explain further .. let me first let you all know that i'm not trying to directly defend this girls actions .. i'm merelyn stating the possibilities for such actions ... many of you people seem to even take that personally ...

don't even compare a puppy to a human child .. of course these people would be more willing to take care of their child over puppies ... also .. YES a puppy is WAY cheaper to take care of than a human child ... but what if you could barely afford to care for a child .. the puppy would then be out of the question .. the nearest animal shelter may be a hundred or more miles away.

Oh, well that certainly clears things up. But then again, I'm from the US and people do get really offended by acts of cruelty against animals (otherwise we probably wouldn't have made it a federal offense). And I have seen instances where people value their pet's well-being over those of their family members. But, oh well. I still do wonder though why they'd even have a pet if keeping their child happy was draining their monetary reserves.

Oh, and I hope you didn't think that I was yelling at you or being sarcastic. (Because I wasn't...) Although, I get the feeling that you might have been toward me with the all-capitalization of a few words in your rebuttal. I'm just sayin'.

 

[SsilverR]

i can't comment on this without first knowing more about the situation .. for all i know her parents ordered her to do it because the pet unintentionally got preggo and they couldn't afford to keep the pups .. no one else would take them and that was their final option

puppies are expensive and they require ALOT of attention .. more so than kittens .. it may be sad for us to witness (including me, i'm a huge dog lover, this video hurt me alot) but there might have been no other choice .. this is reality and i'll face it as an adult

Well, if they were so inadequate to care for them, why didn't they just hand them over to an animal shelter? And in the case of an accidental pregnancy, why didn't they have the dog spayed or neutered? And if those parents told her to do this then they could face some serious charges. (High fines and jail time.) That girl will likely be thrown into Juvenile Detention or sent to a Psychiatrist. (And neither are cheap.)

As for the expensiveness, puppies are a lot cheaper than you'd expect. Sure they require food, water, something to keep them entertained, but if you were to compare the expenses of a puppy to those of a single human child, you'd probably be surprised. Plus a dog ages 7x faster than a human so by the time it turns 14ish, that doggie will soon be gone forever. Unlike a human child that could stay with his or her parents a good 24 years before even thinking of moving out on their own.

So really, which was the costlier decision?

firsly, here in the UK psychiatric care is free ... spraying a dog ISN'T .. handing them in may require time and effort .. none of which they may of had

ok before i explain further .. let me first let you all know that i'm not trying to directly defend this girls actions .. i'm merelyn stating the possibilities for such actions ... many of you people seem to even take that personally ...

don't even compare a puppy to a human child .. of course these people would be more willing to take care of their child over puppies ... also .. YES a puppy is WAY cheaper to take care of than a human child ... but what if you could barely afford to care for a child .. the puppy would then be out of the question .. the nearest animal shelter may be a hundred or more miles away.

Yeah, we wouldn't won't people to have to go out of their way or anything. It's probably better they just toss the dogs in a river.

ok please hear me out .. some of these country folk live a long, LONG way from any organisations that may have taken these pups in ... maybe they didn't have guns .. maybe getting their kids to throw the pups in a river was all they could see as humane .. maybe they thought there was a chance that the pups would survive and make it on their own somehow, maybe they didn't have the heart to ring their necks and watch them die.

all i'm saying is that it's not our place to judge this unless we knew everything about the situation .. maybe it WAS the only way they had

pups will come back if you just leave them on the road .. hell i would've taken them all in if i was there .. but this is life and these things happen .. not sometimes .. but ALOT ... you can't always blame one side because it seems the worst at first glance

 

[Danpascooch]

Because no matter how much you wanna fuck that chimp. It's not human bro.

I'm just gonna be straight here, this was probably the best post ever, I laughed my ass of at that line, I hate when people try to distract you from the important points by splitting hairs like "people are technically animals" when it's totally irrelevant.

Seriously, good for you, too many people forsake logic, but I love the point-by-point clusterfuck, it's my favorite type of post.

I agree mostly with what you said, except the part that her life is worth more than those puppies, is an average human worth more? Yes. Is she worth more than a single puppy? Probably. All those puppies? No, because she's a crazy puppy killer, so she's not worth very much.

 

[Proarcher]

I am feeling sick... that is one of the most terrible things I've ever seen. If there is a god and a hell, please god, please send her to hell.

 

[Danpascooch]

i can't comment on this without first knowing more about the situation .. for all i know her parents ordered her to do it because the pet unintentionally got preggo and they couldn't afford to keep the pups .. no one else would take them and that was their final option

puppies are expensive and they require ALOT of attention .. more so than kittens .. it may be sad for us to witness (including me, i'm a huge dog lover, this video hurt me alot) but there might have been no other choice .. this is reality and i'll face it as an adult

Are you fucking kidding me?

Give me ONE situation when there is NO CHOICE but to violently throw a barrel of puppies in a fucking river, seriously, I don't want to call you stupid, but you're making it very hard for me.

1.) Give them to a shelter

2.) Keep them

3.) Abandon them

4.) Gently Place them in a river

5.) Pile them in a bucket, and huck them into the middle of the river like you're playing a game of extreme skeeball.

The first two are proper options, three is not cool but it's possible that you have no other choice, four would work, but only if the puppies WERE ON FIRE, five? Fuck no, no reason, ever.

 

[martin's a madman]

I like how people are generally "meh" about homicides, but flip their shit when someone kills a puppy. It genuinely entertains me.

Probably because people hate other people more than they do animals. Plus I think a person would have a better time at fighting back than puppies would. And if you want to argue about homicides against babies, then direct your attention toward abortionists and how babies would be on the same level defense-wise as those puppies were.

You're silly. Getting an abortion is not killing a baby.

 

[SsilverR]

i can't comment on this without first knowing more about the situation .. for all i know her parents ordered her to do it because the pet unintentionally got preggo and they couldn't afford to keep the pups .. no one else would take them and that was their final option

puppies are expensive and they require ALOT of attention .. more so than kittens .. it may be sad for us to witness (including me, i'm a huge dog lover, this video hurt me alot) but there might have been no other choice .. this is reality and i'll face it as an adult

Well, if they were so inadequate to care for them, why didn't they just hand them over to an animal shelter? And in the case of an accidental pregnancy, why didn't they have the dog spayed or neutered? And if those parents told her to do this then they could face some serious charges. (High fines and jail time.) That girl will likely be thrown into Juvenile Detention or sent to a Psychiatrist. (And neither are cheap.)

As for the expensiveness, puppies are a lot cheaper than you'd expect. Sure they require food, water, something to keep them entertained, but if you were to compare the expenses of a puppy to those of a single human child, you'd probably be surprised. Plus a dog ages 7x faster than a human so by the time it turns 14ish, that doggie will soon be gone forever. Unlike a human child that could stay with his or her parents a good 24 years before even thinking of moving out on their own.

So really, which was the costlier decision?

firsly, here in the UK psychiatric care is free ... spraying a dog ISN'T .. handing them in may require time and effort .. none of which they may of had

ok before i explain further .. let me first let you all know that i'm not trying to directly defend this girls actions .. i'm merelyn stating the possibilities for such actions ... many of you people seem to even take that personally ...

don't even compare a puppy to a human child .. of course these people would be more willing to take care of their child over puppies ... also .. YES a puppy is WAY cheaper to take care of than a human child ... but what if you could barely afford to care for a child .. the puppy would then be out of the question .. the nearest animal shelter may be a hundred or more miles away.

Oh, well that certainly clears things up. But then again, I'm from the US and people do get really offended by acts of cruelty against animals (otherwise we probably wouldn't have made it a federal offense). And I have seen instances where people value their pet's well-being over those of their family members. But, oh well. I still do wonder though why they'd even have a pet if keeping their child happy was draining their monetary reserves.

Oh, and I hope you didn't think that I was yelling at you or being sarcastic. (Because I wasn't...) Although, I get the feeling that you might have been toward me with the all-capitalization of a few words in your rebuttal. I'm just sayin'.

it's cool, i understand .. i'm a dog owner myself (got a 1 and a half year old Rottweiler called cesar) althought this vid hurt me genuinely i always remembered the words my father told me "think with your brain first and your heart second" ... to tell you the truth this conversation was very draining ... even though it feels wrong i have to view this situation logically and i'm taking the side i wouldn't instinctively take ... for now all i wanna do is hug cesar and say thanks that i was able to afford him and he wasn't born into such a situation .. LOL no matter what time i wake him up he's never grumpy ROTFL .. always happy i'm ther

holy shit this topic almost brought a tear to my eye.

 

[Thamous]

I like how people are generally "meh" about homicides, but flip their shit when someone kills a puppy. It genuinely entertains me.

Probably because people hate other people more than they do animals. Plus I think a person would have a better time at fighting back than puppies would. And if you want to argue about homicides against babies, then direct your attention toward abortionists and how babies would be on the same level defense-wise as those puppies were.

You're silly. Getting an abortion is not killing a baby.

Alright, I just wanna say this now. Lets not make this into an argument about abortion.

 

[Treeinthewoods]

Was anyone here raised in a rural environment? I was raised herding sheep, growing alfalfa and working on a neighbors dairy. To most people in rural areas animals are more of a tool then a pet (cats are kept on the farm to eat mice, dogs herd sheep and fight coyote). They are not family members in the least so killing one is the same as slaughtering one of your pigs or cows. One dog killed a chicken in my neighbors coop, he was shot upon discovery. A doberman pinscher that was on the farm for years pinned me down and bit me on the shoulder while I was playing on the haypile, my grandma shot him herself. My point is, this view is also held by people that live in cities and all kinds of places. Hell, in some areas your favorite pet would be sold by the pound with two veg!

If puppies are born and they are mixed breed (ie - won't be naturally good herding or working dogs) they are a burden, not a blessing. They keep your good ***** from working and they will only cost more money then they make you. Farm life is not easy, every penny really does count.

A common way to get rid of unwanted/useless puppies? Bag with rocks into the river. Remember, they are not people. Hell, if you think they are just assume the suffering is over and they won't have to starve later on or get beat the shit out of every day by uncaring owners.

I have a dog and two cats now (I live in the city at last) and I do care about them, but I would drown them all twice to save even one random human without thinking twice. Honestly, if you would prioritize an animal over a person you are at least as psychotic as the girl in the video.

 

[ShadowsofHope]

That.. fucking.. *****.

Fuck, I hope the police already have her in custody. Twisted individuals like this just.. damnit!

 

[Danpascooch]

i can't comment on this without first knowing more about the situation .. for all i know her parents ordered her to do it because the pet unintentionally got preggo and they couldn't afford to keep the pups .. no one else would take them and that was their final option

puppies are expensive and they require ALOT of attention .. more so than kittens .. it may be sad for us to witness (including me, i'm a huge dog lover, this video hurt me alot) but there might have been no other choice .. this is reality and i'll face it as an adult

Well, if they were so inadequate to care for them, why didn't they just hand them over to an animal shelter? And in the case of an accidental pregnancy, why didn't they have the dog spayed or neutered? And if those parents told her to do this then they could face some serious charges. (High fines and jail time.) That girl will likely be thrown into Juvenile Detention or sent to a Psychiatrist. (And neither are cheap.)

As for the expensiveness, puppies are a lot cheaper than you'd expect. Sure they require food, water, something to keep them entertained, but if you were to compare the expenses of a puppy to those of a single human child, you'd probably be surprised. Plus a dog ages 7x faster than a human so by the time it turns 14ish, that doggie will soon be gone forever. Unlike a human child that could stay with his or her parents a good 24 years before even thinking of moving out on their own.

So really, which was the costlier decision?

firsly, here in the UK psychiatric care is free ... spraying a dog ISN'T .. handing them in may require time and effort .. none of which they may of had

ok before i explain further .. let me first let you all know that i'm not trying to directly defend this girls actions .. i'm merelyn stating the possibilities for such actions ... many of you people seem to even take that personally ...

don't even compare a puppy to a human child .. of course these people would be more willing to take care of their child over puppies ... also .. YES a puppy is WAY cheaper to take care of than a human child ... but what if you could barely afford to care for a child .. the puppy would then be out of the question .. the nearest animal shelter may be a hundred or more miles away.

Yeah, we wouldn't won't people to have to go out of their way or anything. It's probably better they just toss the dogs in a river.

ok please hear me out .. some of these country folk live a long, LONG way from any organisations that may have taken these pups in ... maybe they didn't have guns .. maybe getting their kids to throw the pups in a river was all they could see as humane .. maybe they thought there was a chance that the pups would survive and make it on their own somehow, maybe they didn't have the heart to ring their necks and watch them die.

all i'm saying is that it's not our place to judge this unless we knew everything about the situation .. maybe it WAS the only way they had

pups will come back if you just leave them on the road .. hell i would've taken them all in if i was there .. but this is life and these things happen .. not sometimes .. but ALOT ... you can't always blame one side because it seems the worst at first glance

LEAVE THE PUPPIES IN A FUCKING FIELD.

That's like saying "maybe they were a long way from civilization, so they decided TO SHOOT THEM OUT OF THE AIR LIKE CLAY PIDGEONS!

I don't care where you live, violently hurling puppies to a watery death is never alright, not even close, and it obviously isn't your idiotic scenario, if so, why the FUCK would they FILM it!?

 

[Americow]

Actually, they are on it anyways.