a lot like Dan Rather and Katie Couric when they worked for CBS.buy teh haloz said:Glen Beck is a fucking joke anyway. Him working for Fox News is just the punchline.
hahahaFuture Hero said:How do you kill that which has no life?2012 Wont Happen said:I'm on itavantguardian said:Kill him. Please, someone, kill him.
(not really though)
(epic south-park quote)
Ewwwwwwwwww....I second that notion, Ewwwwwwww!ae86gamer said:Ewwwwwww. Thats all I can say. Ewwwwwwwww.
How can it be wrong if it feels so very right baby.Ninja_X said:YES THERE IS.Berethond said:Why?
Nothing wrong with making out with your sister.
Its VERY wrong.
You're welcome.la-le-lu-li-lo said:This made me 'LOL'. Thank you for that.Berethond said:Why?
Nothing wrong with making out with your sister.
Also, whether or not it's true, it's disturbing. Like, why...? /:
This is how I feel. Mostly because I really like the words "uncouth poltroon".Aardvark said:Who?
No really, who? And why should I care? Why are you befouling my internets with this garbage, you uncouth poltroon?
He's on the slippery slope...he WAS on the Nazi slope now he's on the Incest slope. It really doesn't matter what he says, he doesn't deserve a show.daealdric said:Not that I expect people to actually read this, but here goes:
If you had actually listened to his show, which you didn't, he went on to say that he never made out with his sister. All during his show he made statements like "some of you small minded people will disagree" and "can't you see through your prejudices?" He was trying to demonstrate how some people will try to demonize those that disagree them. How the society has been beaten down so much that they can't call something that is wrong, wrong.
Again, he NEVER made out with his sister.
Ninja X cannot make this any clearer. /threadNinja_X said:I already did, honestly how much do I have to repeat it for you?Glefistus said:Please elaborate on HOW it is an evolutionary step backwards.Ninja_X said:It is wrong because it represents an evolutionary step backwards. As I have said countless times.Glefistus said:\Ninja_X said:Making out with a sibling represents a sexual urge that most humans are hard wired not to have. If you make out with someone it is a SEXUAL act, even if it is a small one. That makes it wrong.Glefistus said:Back to my challenge: Give me ONE reason it is wrong, if they are not breeding. Leaving OUT emotional and religious reasons.
Its fact and guess what? THAT ARTICLE SUPPORTS MY ARGUMENT DUMBASS.
"Partners will be genetically different."Within MHC-dissimilar couples the partners will be genetically different, and such a pattern of mate choice decreases the danger of endogamy (mating among relatives) and increases the genetic variability of offspring. Genetic variability is known to be an advantage for offspring, and the MHC effect could be an evolutionary strategy underlying incest avoidance in humans and also improving the efficiency of the immune system, the scientists say.
"Decreases the danger of endogamy (mating among relatives)"
"Genetic viability is known to be an advantage for offspring"
At lest two places in the article that prove I am not talking out my ass. Avoiding incorrect match ups is genetic human instinct."Although it may be tempting to think that humans choose their partners because of their similarities", says Professor Bicalho, "our research has shown clearly that it is differences that make for successful reproduction, and that the subconscious drive to have healthy children is important when choosing a mate."
Get your facts strait or shut up.
The article does NOT support your central argument, it simply states that there are potentially genetic safeties in place to avoid inbreeding. You have yet to come up with one reason why it is wrong, supplying they do not breed. It's JUST like saying someone with Huntington's disease shouldn't have sex if he's had a Vasectomy or if she has had a similar procedure done.
In fact, let's assume the siblings are both sterile. Give me ONE reason, why it is wrong now.
I'll state now, that I think it is VERY gross. But that is an emotional response.
Even if they don't breed, they would still have to have sexual feelings for each other, which is wrong because we are hard wired against that. a human without that instinct is defective, therefore the sexual behavior resulting from it is wrong.
Oh the times I wish I had a short memory!tucci said:Wow, I don't know why Glenn Beck doesn't write porno books (sarcasm), but the craziest thing is, I couldn't get the image out of my head that Glenn Beck's sister would look just like him. So it would be like GLenn Beck making out with himself.