Sorry mate, but fudge is actually a European food... being made primarily from sugar, which was imported from India.Furbyz said:And the fudge shall not be denied. Now that I think about it, I have no idea how widespread fudge is.
You are correct about toffee, of course, but no, the exact process for making fudge is widely believed to have been discovered in 1886 in Baltimore during a botched attempt to make caramels. The crystallizing of the sugar, milk, and butter mixture and whipping it as it cools to the creamy texture characterized as modern day fudge was happened upon in America. I am not denying that other similar confections are European, but fudge, as we know it today, is American. We didn't come along and add chocolate. We came along, screwed up a completely different recipe, and it happened to turn out pretty well. Here's a European that did his research admitting such and a host of others saying the exact same thing.Frungy said:Sorry mate, but fudge is actually a European food... being made primarily from sugar, which was imported from India.Furbyz said:And the fudge shall not be denied. Now that I think about it, I have no idea how widespread fudge is.
Americans added chocolate to it, fruit to it, etc. but the original dishes, toffee, fudge and the primary recipes are all European.
Claiming that fudge is American is like claiming that the U.K. invented lamb just because it put mint sauce on top. Adding a different garnish doesn't reinvent the dish.
... so sorry, but ... DENIED.
you could, but why would you want to add those? Grits are terrible, cornbeard and hush puppies are basically the same thing except one is more fried than the other.Netrigan said:Furbyz said:And America has produced at least one legitimate wholly unique food. Sure, it's only one of the more recent in a long line of confectionery pursuits, but America gave the world fudge.
![]()
And the fudge shall not be denied. Now that I think about it, I have no idea how widespread fudge is.
If we go all Native American on you, then we can probably add pretty much anything made out of corn, such as cornbread, grits, and hush-puppies. Soul food borrows extensively from Native American cuisine.
Yes. While visiting family in England, every place with breakfast that I stayed at was phenomenal. Very thick, but still crispy bacon, full cooked sausage, fried tomatoes over egg, and sweetened grains that put my mini-wheats to shame. That's just breakfast.j-e-f-f-e-r-s said:British food is fucking awesome.
Sorry, normally I hate anything to do with nationalism, but I never understood this thing where British cuisine gets spat on. We've got some of the tastiest food on the planet, and even better, it'll actually fill you up!
The Scots Tablet (taiblet), which has a courser, grainier texture is closer to what I would consider Fudge (I quite dislike the more toffee-like fudges... if I want toffee I'll eat toffees, if I want fudge I want something crumbly that'll dissolve in my mouth), and predates the American Fudge by nearly a hundred years (the recipe is a little different, with the Scots tablet using sugar, condensed milk and butter, while the American Fudge uses sugar, butter, milk and often chocolate and/or fruit).Furbyz said:You are correct about toffee, of course, but no, the exact process for making fudge is widely believed to have been discovered in 1886 in Baltimore during a botched attempt to make caramels. The crystallizing of the sugar, milk, and butter mixture and whipping it as it cools to the creamy texture characterized as modern day fudge was happened upon in America. I am not denying that other similar confections are European, but fudge, as we know it today, is American. We didn't come along and add chocolate. We came along, screwed up a completely different recipe, and it happened to turn out pretty well. Here's a European that did his research admitting such and a host of others saying the exact same thing.
http://www.worldwidewords.org/articles/ar-fud1.htm
http://www.darbysfudge.com/fudgehistory.html
http://www.thenibble.com/reviews/main/candy/old/history-of-fudge.asp
http://bbgees.com/History_of_Fudge_Explained.html
Though, you could go so far to say as we didn't come up with a dish so much as a texture. I would consider that a very valid point.
You are an officer and a gentleman. Your apology is accepted with gratitude for the kind gesture.Furbyz said:Also, I apologize for my countrymen. I really have no idea why this place breeds such stubborn, pigheadedness, but it does with frightening regularity.
Grits are tits, dude. Really, it's just another way to make risotto. And there is nothing at all wrong with cornbread. NOTHING. Crumble some into a nice spicy chili and I'm all set.Ryotknife said:you could, but why would you want to add those? Grits are terrible, cornbeard and hush puppies are basically the same thing except one is more fried than the other.Netrigan said:Furbyz said:And America has produced at least one legitimate wholly unique food. Sure, it's only one of the more recent in a long line of confectionery pursuits, but America gave the world fudge.
![]()
And the fudge shall not be denied. Now that I think about it, I have no idea how widespread fudge is.
If we go all Native American on you, then we can probably add pretty much anything made out of corn, such as cornbread, grits, and hush-puppies. Soul food borrows extensively from Native American cuisine.
I can't be racist, I have a friend who is black!Frungy said:Oh get over yourself. I have American friends,
Congratulations, you know some inconsiderate Americans out of 313 million.but their inability to apologise does sometimes drive me a bit crazy.
Same problem as before, only in reverse.Europeans will apologise as a reflex action, which can come across as quite insincere,
Claiming this is true for all Americans because you know a few is totally not a prideful thing to say at all, because of course you aren't wrong.while those from the U.S. just seem completely unable to do it at all, and that comes across as arrogant and prideful.
Go to a steak house and ask them to wash your steak in ammonia before cooking. You will feel right at homeSuperlative said:I'm headed to London with my uni on Saturday and I can't help but wonder just how true or false the jokes about British cooking skills are. Is there such a thing as tasty food from England? does it cost an arm and a leg? will it be served by a gentleman wearing a top hat and monicle?
also, if anyone is in the area and feels like hanging out with a ~190cm American, I'll more then likely be hanging out at the National Royal Hotel on the 6th at 6:30pm...
I'm not even English (I'm American), but this. So much this. It pisses me off so much when I find an IPA that's freaking cold. IT'S MEANT TO BE ROOM TEMPERATURE! The coldness ruins the flavour so much!SonOfVoorhees said:Saying Uk has no good food is like saying American serves just McDonalds. America jokes about the fact the English have bad teeth, talk posh and drink warm beer. Unfortunately, the English have better teeth hygiene than America, we dont talk posh, most of us are common and we drink beer cold.....apart from ales that are meant to be room temp.
Fair enough, while fudge may have been made independently, it certainly wasn't the first to heat sugar, milk, and butter (or any combination of the three) to the soft ball stage. Although, I do need to comment that fudge is not a general term for similar confections, but a rather specific one. Tablet and fudge simply aren't the same thing, as the signature characteristic of fudge is its smooth, creamy texture.Frungy said:The Scots Tablet (taiblet), which has a courser, grainier texture is closer to what I would consider Fudge (I quite dislike the more toffee-like fudges... if I want toffee I'll eat toffees, if I want fudge I want something crumbly that'll dissolve in my mouth), and predates the American Fudge by nearly a hundred years (the recipe is a little different, with the Scots tablet using sugar, condensed milk and butter, while the American Fudge uses sugar, butter, milk and often chocolate and/or fruit).Furbyz said:You are correct about toffee, of course, but no, the exact process for making fudge is widely believed to have been discovered in 1886 in Baltimore during a botched attempt to make caramels. The crystallizing of the sugar, milk, and butter mixture and whipping it as it cools to the creamy texture characterized as modern day fudge was happened upon in America. I am not denying that other similar confections are European, but fudge, as we know it today, is American. We didn't come along and add chocolate. We came along, screwed up a completely different recipe, and it happened to turn out pretty well. Here's a European that did his research admitting such and a host of others saying the exact same thing.
http://www.worldwidewords.org/articles/ar-fud1.htm
http://www.darbysfudge.com/fudgehistory.html
http://www.thenibble.com/reviews/main/candy/old/history-of-fudge.asp
http://bbgees.com/History_of_Fudge_Explained.html
Though, you could go so far to say as we didn't come up with a dish so much as a texture. I would consider that a very valid point.
There's also a similar Indian (originally possibly Persian) dessert known as Barfi (an unfortunate name) that dates back to the 16th century, which used similar ingredients to American Fudge, but normally includes nuts and and fruit.
The history of food is quite fascinating, and by the dates I would suggest that modern "Fudge" originated in ancient Persia, went to India, and then courtesy of colonisation made its way to Scotland and from there to the U.S., with each culture changing the recipe and flavour a little, as well as the trimmings.
I apologise for my original post placing the origin as European, it seems that the Middle East is most probably the earliest point of origin for the dish that we now call "fudge".
You are an officer and a gentleman. Your apology is accepted with gratitude for the kind gesture.Furbyz said:Also, I apologize for my countrymen. I really have no idea why this place breeds such stubborn, pigheadedness, but it does with frightening regularity.
Honestly, you should try a lot of the microbrews in the US, they are very good. My favorite ones are Sierra Nevada and Great Lakes, and IPAs are the most popular style at the moment, but I don't are much for hoppy beers. I prefer anything from Porters and Stouts to Belgian Whites and Doppelbocks. If you can get a chance to try some good American craft beers, You won't be disappointed. BTW, I got me a pack of Guinness, so my night is complete.SkarKrow said:On talking posh, wasn't there a thing done (some documentary on TV) about british accents (and I mean the whole bloody lot of them, all 250 odd or however many) and how americans interpreted them and when questioning american students they couldn't understand a lot of them fully with the worst offender being the geordie?SonOfVoorhees said:Snip
Cuz I have american friends who've failed to understand what I'm saying when I descend into my native jargon.
Yeah we serve german beer in the UK : D[sup]Joke[/sup]SonOfVoorhees said:Hey, just realised.....you will actually be able to drink a proper beer than that watery crap they serve in America.![]()
Yeah try the local beers, they're good stuff. Look out for things like Dark Lord, Old Tom, and any black sheep ale.
I probably would if I knew what passed for traditional Swedish cuisine (I'm guessing there's a lot of fish involved).theSteamSupported said:Fish'n'Chips and Shepherd's Pie. UK cuisine is pretty darn ok to me.
Speaking of which, why isn't anyone taking a piss on traditional Swedish cuisine?