Yeah I don't know where they went wrong with Deus Ex 2. It was still ok, but VERY short and just didn't grab me as much as the first one.Monkeyman8 said:*nods* though it did have some good ideas that would've made it a great game if they'd kept anything that drew people the majesty in the first place intact.Kimarous said:"Majesty: A Fantasy Kingdom Sim" was awesome. Its sequel fills me with the deepest hatred and rage.
OP: either that or fallout 2, or Deus Ex
God guys... I'm going to go play Kotor now. It's like talking about food. Like chicken. KFC. Anybody want eat some KFC now? The nice hot steamy chicken fillet on the soft bun... shit I want KFC myself now D=Amphoteric said:Kotor was perfect Kotor 2 was good.Woodsey said:Believe it or not, I hear some people think that the game was actually better than the first.minimacker said:Perhaps not the absolute worst sequel, but it sure as hell wasn't even close to the original. I'm talking about KOTOR 2, of course.
*shudder*
Probably because it wasn't meant to be a twist.Woodsey said:The plot is incoherent in a number of places and of the major quests in the game is cut halfway through (the HK factory) with no indication that you can't get any further.veloper said:So the ending was bad and the gfx were meh (though I judge the gfx are comparable to the 1st and mostly copy/pasted from K1 anyway).Woodsey said:It's not awful because of the gameplay.veloper said:Both games are very similar.Bible Doctor said:KOTOR 2 was awful, just awful.
KOTOR is my favorite game.
If 1 has shitty gameplay, then 2 has shitty gameplay.
2 is cut to bits, has one of the worst endings ever, is bug-ridden and looks worse than the first game.
The only bug I ever encountered in K2 was the Telos academy dialogue bug that skipped the encounter with Atris and got you stuck. Bad, but hardly worst-sequel-ever-made material.
On the up side and apart from the ending, I think the story and dialogues were less bad than the original.
Which is worse: a story with a rushed ending or a worse story overal?
I don't really care. Gameplay is mediocre in both and the rest is close, which to me makes it a mediocre sequel to a mediocre original in my book.
KotOR has a simpler plot, but it handles it with finesse and is widely considered to have one of the best twists in gaming.
KotOR 2's twist is ruined in the menu screen, and hinted at with the subtly of a jackhammer. I.e. Kreia is going to betray you. (Kind of).
I'm one of those people. It's also my favorite game of all time. Kreia is the best written character in video game history.Woodsey said:Believe it or not, I hear some people think that the game was actually better than the first.minimacker said:Perhaps not the absolute worst sequel, but it sure as hell wasn't even close to the original. I'm talking about KOTOR 2, of course.
*shudder*
.... ... .. ..... ..The Bandit said:I'm one of those people. It's also my favorite game of all time. Kreia is the best written character in video game history.Woodsey said:Believe it or not, I hear some people think that the game was actually better than the first.minimacker said:Perhaps not the absolute worst sequel, but it sure as hell wasn't even close to the original. I'm talking about KOTOR 2, of course.
*shudder*
If that was a shudder, maybe I just gave you a seizure? I kind of hope so.
sizzle949 said:Mercenary was a pretty good game, and the sequel was broken up garbage, so imma throw in my hat for that one.
I'm going to have to agree with these folk. Granted, I played Merc 1 on xbawks and a port of Mercs 2 on PC (with a controller), but the sequel was so broken it was barely playable. And then came the announcement that they developer was not going to patch. At all.captainordo said:mercinaries 2
mercinaries 1 was a lot of fun, and then Pandemic dicided to begin to die inside.
I guess It was personal disappointment more than poor quality.GeneticallyModifiedDucks said:Why exactly would you say that Up Your Arsenal was bad? For me, it was better, or at the very least equal to the previous games. The series went downhill after UYA.Mikeyfell said:well the biggest gap in quality between a game and it's sequel would be Ratchet and Clank Up Your Arsenal
if Ratchet and Clank Going Commando was a 10
Ratchet and Clank UYA was a 4
but the worst game I've ever played that happened to be a sequel was Grand Theft Auto 4
If the GTA series is a 5 with Vice city at a 7
GTA 4 is charitably sitting on a 2
It's not like R&C2 had that many weapons. A good percentage of them were from R&C1 anyway. The original had the least weapons and that was still fun. Grinding was entirely up to you. If anything, I'd recommend not grinding, because then the game poses a decent challenge without feeling overwhelming.Mikeyfell said:I guess It was personal disappointment more than poor quality.
when I played R&C1 it was amazing
then R&C 2 was nearly perfect
then UYA was bad
it was the first game that ever did that to me
but why was UYA bad?
the gun choices weren't as varied as the other R&C games. 20 weapons with 8 upgrades made it feel like a grind, especially because it was a shorter story campaign.
the fire fights all felt the same no matter which gun I was using
the boss fights were all huge let downs
it was a victim of the "having online multyplayer lets up skimp on content" school of thought.
even the humor and the story line wasn't as good
it was still mostly unchanged but it wasn't fun anymore
then when Deadlock came out I wasn't touching the series anymore
I caught a glimpse of a friend playing Deadlock and my thought was "that looks boring, what are you playing?"
HSI5I? Are you sure you know morse code?Woodsey said:.... ... .. ..... ..The Bandit said:I'm one of those people. It's also my favorite game of all time. Kreia is the best written character in video game history.Woodsey said:Believe it or not, I hear some people think that the game was actually better than the first.minimacker said:Perhaps not the absolute worst sequel, but it sure as hell wasn't even close to the original. I'm talking about KOTOR 2, of course.
*shudder*
If that was a shudder, maybe I just gave you a seizure? I kind of hope so.
R&C 2's weapons all felt different R&C 3's weapons all felt the same.GeneticallyModifiedDucks said:It's not like R&C2 had that many weapons. A good percentage of them were from R&C1 anyway. The original had the least weapons and that was still fun. Grinding was entirely up to you. If anything, I'd recommend not grinding, because then the game poses a decent challenge without feeling overwhelming.
R&C 1 and 2 had sort of silly humor to them that I just didn't feel in UYA. UYA felt too serious to me. It certainly had it's moments but on the whole it was sort of a downer, and the ending was too heroic for a Ratchet and Clank game. if I recall correctly.GeneticallyModifiedDucks said:As for the story, I was severely impressed by it. I can't say I remember specific moments from the game so I can't vouch for the humour. But the approach it took was definitely as interesting as the previous games. The way I see it, all the R&C games had a hint of self-parody about them. Everything that's done within the context of the game felt like it was secretly making fun of or pointing out the flawed logic of event in real life. It approached issues like propaganda, submission, racism, all that stuff. Of course they were always cartoony and light-hearted so people probably didn't notice. But I'm pretty sure all of it was intentional. Ted Price is an intelligent man. Just think about this: "Courtney Gears". Sound familiar? Perhaps similar to a certain celebrity?
I don't think that was Insomniac's intention but they must have phoned something in to squeeze in that multyplayer. but you have to understand this was among the first games I ever played, and the first that ever "let me down"GeneticallyModifiedDucks said:I wouldn't say it subscribed to the school of thought that having multiplayer excuses singleplayer, at least not in the same way games these days do. The PS2 was never a multiplayer centric console to begin with. I've never gone online on any PS2 game, and that's true for a lot of other people as well. Besides it was extremely cheap when it launched (I got for like 30? in 2006), so I wouldn't say my expectations were sky high, but I wasn't disappointed with what I got.
Silly me, what I meant to say was:Nevyrmoore said:HSI5I? Are you sure you know morse code?Woodsey said:.... ... .. ..... ..The Bandit said:I'm one of those people. It's also my favorite game of all time. Kreia is the best written character in video game history.Woodsey said:Believe it or not, I hear some people think that the game was actually better than the first.minimacker said:Perhaps not the absolute worst sequel, but it sure as hell wasn't even close to the original. I'm talking about KOTOR 2, of course.
*shudder*
If that was a shudder, maybe I just gave you a seizure? I kind of hope so.
I rather enjoyed X-2...at least for the combat system.Jimmybobjr said:Final Fantasy X's Sequel, Final Fantasy X-2.