Noooooo. They aren't semi-colons.chemicalreaper said:I just love it when people neglect to use semi-colons; it's really not hard to use them correctly.
It's possibly my most hated mistake, merely because it's one of the easiest to correct. It makes me angry.Mr Montmorency said:Also, I want to stab anyone in the eye who says "loose" instead of "lose".
That one gets me too. It's supposed to be cereal.dathwampeer said:I'm no grammatical genius. But there are some things that get to me. Like serial instead of serious.
There's actually a good linguistic reason for this. Basically, there are two types of consonants in English: voiced (the vocal cords vibrate) and voiceless (they don't). When you have a word or phrase that runs sounds of two types together, one will tend to get "pulled" towards the other type. What's happening with "have to" is that the T is voiceless, and the V is getting pulled towards the voiceless equivalent (F).Marter said:People always seem to pronounce the word "have" the same as the word "half". As in "I half to do this."
This bugs the hell out of me too. People who don't know how to use reflexive pronouns shouldn't be allowed to have any. The only time that sort of usage is correct is in cases like "Did you hurt yourself" or "I made a fool of myself".Charley said:The one that really irks me (yes, "irks") is when people tack 'self' onto the end of a possessive to try and sound smarter
That's certainly very interesting, thanks for telling me. Although, you can still stop it, so I'm going to continue to tell people to fix it. ^_^Buzz Killington said:There's actually a good linguistic reason for this. Basically, there are two types of consonants in English: voiced (the vocal cords vibrate) and voiceless (they don't). When you have a word or phrase that runs sounds of two types together, one will tend to get "pulled" towards the other type. What's happening with "have to" is that the T is voiceless, and the V is getting pulled towards the voiceless equivalent (F).