Yeah, I thought it was doing fine. Considering Rockstar has money-baths and all.GiantRaven said:I wasn't aware that GTA was in a state that needed 'reviving'. Remind me when that happened again.
If I do recall, 3 years was the interval for each of the Halo games of the original trillogy, and that never counted as revived.Ronarch said:http://games.ign.com/articles/121/1210615p1.html
Is it too late for GTA to revive this series? It's been three years, and there is competition from Saint's Row 3. I like the series but feel it a bit overused.
Quoted to make you take the effort of reading other people's post in this topic now that you have been quoted.ZeroMachine said:Yeah, I thought it was doing fine. Considering Rockstar has money-baths and all.GiantRaven said:I wasn't aware that GTA was in a state that needed 'reviving'. Remind me when that happened again.
Are you implying that I didn't read the OP or quoted post, or do you be trollin', they hatin'?Anomynous 167 said:If I do recall, 3 years was the interval for each of the Halo games of the original trillogy, and that never counted as revived.Ronarch said:http://games.ign.com/articles/121/1210615p1.html
Is it too late for GTA to revive this series? It's been three years, and there is competition from Saint's Row 3. I like the series but feel it a bit overused.
Quoted to make you take the effort of reading other people's post in this topic now that you have been quoted.ZeroMachine said:Yeah, I thought it was doing fine. Considering Rockstar has money-baths and all.GiantRaven said:I wasn't aware that GTA was in a state that needed 'reviving'. Remind me when that happened again.
If I had to guess, I'd say it's more likely that it shows that people are more likely to weigh in on a topic they disagree on. Topic title here's negative, so the positive crowd jump in; on the more positive titled post, the negatives do the same. Does that say something about us? I'm not really qualified to say.McMullen said:It's interesting seeing the difference in opinion on this thread and on the announcement news post. Here, nearly everyone thinks GTA IV was fine. There, nearly everyone thinks it was boring and didn't live up to Vice City, San Andreas, or even Saint's Row II (I agree with them, though RDR is still one of my favorite games). Two completely different nearly unanimous opinions, on different threads on the same site.
Does this mean that the news readers and forum posters don't mix very much?
That wasn't Rockstar, that was Team Bondi in Australia. Rockstar only published it.Valagetti said:Wait has Rockstar released anything this year? Ooh wait LA noire, god that game was awful.
1. Where'd you get that impression (the first part of your two part)?ZeroMachine said:Are you implying that I didn't read the OP or quoted post, or do you be trollin', they hatin'?Anomynous 167 said:If I do recall, 3 years was the interval for each of the Halo games of the original trillogy, and that never counted as revived.Ronarch said:http://games.ign.com/articles/121/1210615p1.html
Is it too late for GTA to revive this series? It's been three years, and there is competition from Saint's Row 3. I like the series but feel it a bit overused.
Quoted to make you take the effort of reading other people's post in this topic now that you have been quoted.ZeroMachine said:Yeah, I thought it was doing fine. Considering Rockstar has money-baths and all.GiantRaven said:I wasn't aware that GTA was in a state that needed 'reviving'. Remind me when that happened again.
Hah, not a bad tactic. And as for where I got that impression... I don't know, gut feeling, I guess. It happens a lot on here. Meant no offense.Anomynous 167 said:1. Where'd you get that impression (the first part of your two part)?ZeroMachine said:Are you implying that I didn't read the OP or quoted post, or do you be trollin', they hatin'?Anomynous 167 said:If I do recall, 3 years was the interval for each of the Halo games of the original trillogy, and that never counted as revived.Ronarch said:http://games.ign.com/articles/121/1210615p1.html
Is it too late for GTA to revive this series? It's been three years, and there is competition from Saint's Row 3. I like the series but feel it a bit overused.
Quoted to make you take the effort of reading other people's post in this topic now that you have been quoted.ZeroMachine said:Yeah, I thought it was doing fine. Considering Rockstar has money-baths and all.GiantRaven said:I wasn't aware that GTA was in a state that needed 'reviving'. Remind me when that happened again.
1.5 I am not implying that you didn't read the opening post, I was simply yanking your chain to make sure that you end up reading other posts in this thread, and not just reply to the OP and then hide away from the topic.
2. It is spelt "Trawling", not "trolling". =