I don't think you're a "man" (in terms of identity) unless you're somewhat concerned with strength. I don't understand how it's possible for a man who has zero familiarity with violence, or who lacks courage in the face of aggression (pacifism is not courageous in my own opinion), to be proud of themselves.
I also don't think you're much of a man if you complain when bad things happen to you, or something you don't like is said about you. That stuff is just too small. I believe that you personally are as small as the most frivolous, petty thing that you let reach you- and I keep that in mind each and every time I've got to react to something.
You're not a man if you disown a friend because he does something irresponsible and wrecks some expensive property. In 200 years time, that property would have been a pile of rust anyway, and nobody will remember that it ever belonged to some nameless guy from some nameless place. Your relationships with other people should be bigger than that. Small men who are reached by small things tend to be abusive towards others.
I could talk for ages. I can't round out the whole idea I have of manhood in a small response, so I'll leave it there, but TL

R is that I believe manhood still has something to do with the practice of and preparedness for conflict, with having physical prowess and an attitude to life far removed from the trivialities that comprise the overwhelming majority of it: the labour exchange, accidents, gossip, disagreements, getting a foreign holiday once a year (I know a "man" who moans about this every summer) and so on - all completely and objectively unimportant on any significant scale of events.