George Lucas.Dfskelleton said:It should have freaking ended with Halo 3, so then I could have a good final oppinion of it. Now we've got a boring RTS game, another FPS just like the 3rd except sheilds don't recharge, and an upcoming prequel. Who ends a series with a freaking prequel?
Dear sir/madam, please see penny arcade's G.I.F Theory for reasons as to why those indifferent on Halo will hate you for your post. Constructive critisim is good, calling something Cancer is just Godwin's law in a shiny bowtie.vivalahelvig said:Well, halo is a cancer that needs to die, and bungie could really do some cool stuff other than halo:24 or Captain bland's monotonos adventure....
QFT. I still play it.teutonicman said:I've played 1, 2, and 3. Halo CE was the only one I ever got into, oh nostalgia and the fun lan parties.
I remember in my computer class everyone loading up the CE demo and having a class wide lan match on blood gulch.Chickenlittle said:QFT. I still play it.teutonicman said:I've played 1, 2, and 3. Halo CE was the only one I ever got into, oh nostalgia and the fun lan parties.
It's nice to see that a big developer will be able to make a new IP on multiple platforms.
That's exactly what I think too. I feel like a lot of the mainstream people who play Halo probably aren't even aware that Bungie is the company that makes it.Berserker119 said:That said, the next game or series they make probably won't be nearly as successful.
Eh, reach doesn't fell very samey to me. They overhauled the hell out of it. It's more like a Halo 3 without things from Halo 2. Not to say Halo 2 was bad, it was simply a much different game.The Cheezy One said:so many people hate halo as a franchise, without playing any of the games. why? how does the fact this series keeps going hurt you? it doesnt, so please stop whining
im mostly aiming this at you
quoting yahtzee does not make you coolvivalahelvig said:Well, halo is a cancer that needs to die, and bungie could really do some cool stuff other than halo:24 or Captain bland's monotonos adventure....
and to be fair, they are not usually monotonous. 1 was the start a genre, 2 improved multiplayer, 3 was a bit samey, wars was an RTS, ODST involved a completely different angle on the FPS, and reach is probably going to have the same problems as 3, but at least theyve overhauled some stuff
why does it need to die? is the presence of boxes with 'halo' on shelves hurting you? and buy the way? my grandmother died of cancer. i dont think she was killed by halo.
OT: just because bungie is leaving, doesnt mean that the series will end
http://www.escapistmagazine.com/news/view/102544-Bungie-Feels-Uneasy-About-Competing-With-Halo
Same. Nothing like finding a good team CTF on Blood gulch. Anyone else happy that they're giving Halo PC players something in Reach?Chickenlittle said:QFT. I still play it.teutonicman said:I've played 1, 2, and 3. Halo CE was the only one I ever got into, oh nostalgia and the fun lan parties.
It's nice to see that a big developer will be able to make a new IP on multiple platforms.
at ease soldier.Theron Julius said:Eh, reach doesn't fell very samey to me. They overhauled the hell out of it. It's more like a Halo 3 without things from Halo 2. Not to say Halo 2 was bad, it was simply a much different game.
Well I agree with you. Too many people yell at Halo for being the mother of all evil. It's nice to see someone making a stand. *salutes*