The old forum I used to spend the majority of my forum time on was and is far more offensive and insulting. There were only two rules, no porn and no death threats, and the moderators were there to screw with trolls by changing their posts to say embarrassing or gay things only. I should know, since I was one of the mods. My point in bringing this up is that more rules and more strictness do not necessarily make for a better atmosphere. People are who they are - you can't use rules to create legitimate morality. This forum I was on was obviously on the other end of the spectrum, and certain topics were basically impossible to discuss there, but the relaxed atmosphere was much better than the original forum that it splintered off from. Moar rules does not equal moar better. Are rules important? They can be, sure, but blind enforcement of them is not - in my mind at least - good moderating. Good moderating is knowing when not to pull the plug on something. When people say controversial or uninformed things on forums, it paves the way to being insulted, but it also opens an opportunity for discussion. Not that one is always or even usually necessary, but then, none of this is REALLY necessary. When I see a throwaway joke on here get a member in trouble, I honestly find it disappointing. It breeds an atmosphere of paranoia and superiority, I think. I also think giving people badges for 'behaving' for a really long time doubly reinforces the latter. It breeds a sort of rule-abiding fetishism. The giant red report button runs along the same lines. I'm not going to succumb to Godwin's law except ironically accidentally in bringing it up at all, but I hope you get my meaning. Trying to keep people from harassing other people is understandable, but slapping their wrist for posting a picture or a video in lieu of a text response in what is clearly a joke seems a bit puerile to me. Just my long-winded two cents.