Sir Thomas Sean Connery said:
Treeinthewoods said:
No, allowing strangers with no clear accredidation to influence you is weak minded.
That just simply isn't true. Accreditation and influence has nothing to do with the validity of arguments. That's the true beauty of the internet.
The Internet is a false place, I can't verify anybody here in any reliable way and I can't determine their motivations when dispensing opinions. The people who do have that kind of influence over me are rare and special, proven verifiably to be worth listening to. Even then my willingness to adjust a view is determined by the subject they are advising me on as much as by who they are. For example, I am more likely to follow my dad's financial advice then my grandmothers but when it comes to the raising of my daughter I am more likely to listen to my grandmother (assuming the two offer conflicting advice).
Basically if some Internet stranger says something that I don't agree with it just washes by me because I can't even be sure it's what they really believe.
Vault101 said:
Treeinthewoods said:
No, allowing strangers with no clear accredidation to influence you is weak minded. but typically my opinions are formed by my life experiences and the facts I have found through my own research. I always keep a wall up when dealing with message boards or forums because you just can't ever be certain about anybody or anything.
So my views have not changed but I also have never felt validated or anything like that when someone agrees with me.
I read this stuff to see what others think, not because I seek to change myself.
changing your opinion is a very important part of developing as a person..its not weak minded
[quote/]I have a close knit family and group of friends I go to when I have questions
sooo community bias? heh....I kid[/quote]
And my opinions on many subjects have changed over the years, I am very different from how I was in high school or college. For example in high school I used to think transgender people where just drag queens until my mother (a licensed therapist with a Phd) showed me differently. It came for a trustworthy source, it was backed with scientific evidence and I had no reason to dispute it.
What you call community bias I call maintaining a healthy dose of skepticism on all fronts. Allowing people to influence who I am or what I believe is risky, allowing just anyone to do that is not a wise way to live, especially when the Internet is literally chock full of completely conflicting advice and opinions. What would make your opinion more valid than the other non verifiable person who says the exact opposite?
And of course, I expect anyone here to question my opinion on this matter and possibly disagree and live their life a different way, after all I haven't done anything to earn the right to influence anyone here.