what did your family expect, nudity is almost guaranteed in a 15. D:robert632 said:we went to go see the movie wedding crashers or something, and in the first 10 minutes, naked women were on screen.
i was about 9 and with my family.
what did your family expect, nudity is almost guaranteed in a 15. D:robert632 said:we went to go see the movie wedding crashers or something, and in the first 10 minutes, naked women were on screen.
i was about 9 and with my family.
THE THING?! GET BACK IN THERE! NOW!fix-the-spade said:Yes, twice.
I was actually quite ill went I went to see the film, it's a good movie, but not when you've got a stomach infection. Unfortunately the bit with the eyes just pushed me over the edge, so I had to charge out the cinema and start being sick all over the pavement. Hilarious for everyone but me.
<spoiler=The second time: The Thing> Was being reshown at my local cinema, having never seen it before I decided to go.
Then came the bit with the dogs, oh dear god the bit with the dogs. Up until that point the film was brilliant, I'm sure the rest is brilliant too, but there are some things that cannot be unseen.
Thesis on Zombies?? Fair enough.Sick boy said:Fortesque said:No, no, no. Its not one of the better 'zombie' movies around. They arnt Zombies.Sick boy said:whatever dude, I just reckon 28 weeks later is one of the better zombies movies around at the moment, I mean look at the zombie movies being made past 2007, Zombie strippers and House of the Damned. Shit like that, IMO it's ridiculous the amount of shit house zombie movies you get these daysFortesque said:HEY! I Fucking LOVE Zombie movies. Zombies are the greatest horror movie creep ever.Sick boy said:dude, it's not a bad movie, you just don't like zombie movies and if you think you do, then you should enjoy 28 weeks later. It was an awesome movie, althought 28 days later was better.Fortesque said:Only ever walked out once... 28 Weeks Later. Horrible horrible movie
No I've never walked out of a movie, because I only go to the movies I want to see.
HOWEVER, in 28 weeks/days later, they ARNT Zombies. The arnt already dead, just infected with some virus. And i really didnt mind 28 Days Later, thats why i went to see Weeks Later. It was just bad though, was about an hour or so to go and all that was going to happen was all the infected would die... YAY
What makes a Zombie a Zombie
1: They are dead - They arnt
2: They eat people - They dont
3: and depending on era zombies, they are slow, clumsy and braindead - They are fast and seem to be sort of co-ordinated
4: They spread by biting, scratching etc - Granted they do that
1/4 isnt a good score, therefor, not Zombies
They're different kinds of zombies, they're viral zombies as opposed to Undead zombies that you're talking about, everyone knows that. -_- Douche. I know a person who is doing their thesis on zombies.
Zombies aren't corpses at all, if you're going to get literal. Vodou zombis are people who have been controlled by bokor using the black magic of the Loa, and aren't actually dead at all - a "corpse" is created using a deadening potion that essentially puts a person comatose until the bokor applies the antidote. Also, all zombis come from Haiti.* By this logic, Romero-esque zombies (that are actually referred to as "ghouls"), and 28-Days zombies ("Infected") both have exactly as much right to be referred to as zombies.Fortesque said:Thesis on Zombies?? Fair enough.
The definition of a zombie is a reanimated corpse. And the Viral Zombie is something more along the lines of Resident Evil zombies, and even then then T-Virus re-animates the dead tissue in the body. So the viral zombie is still Undead.
EDIT- Viral Zombies as apposed to traditional zombies being controlled by some supernatural force IE Voodoo
I was mainly talking about the argument of movie zombies, and there are also alot of Zombie movies where they are never actually referred to as Zombies. Also, if im not mistaken. I believe they say in 28 Weeks Later " The last of the Infected died of STARVATION ". A zombie couldnt die of starvation, because they are already Dead.Chipperz said:Zombies aren't corpses at all, if you're going to get literal. Vodou zombis are people who have been controlled by bokor using the black magic of the Loa, and aren't actually dead at all - a "corpse" is created using a deadening potion that essentially puts a person comatose until the bokor applies the antidote. Also, all zombis come from Haiti.* By this logic, Romero-esque zombies (that are actually referred to as "ghouls"), and 28-Days zombies ("Infected") both have exactly as much right to be referred to as zombies.Fortesque said:Thesis on Zombies?? Fair enough.
The definition of a zombie is a reanimated corpse. And the Viral Zombie is something more along the lines of Resident Evil zombies, and even then then T-Virus re-animates the dead tissue in the body. So the viral zombie is still Undead.
EDIT- Viral Zombies as apposed to traditional zombies being controlled by some supernatural force IE Voodoo
EDIT - *this may not be entirely accurate, it's been a while since I was really into this stuff. The overall point is that they're never dead though.
Me too!!! I thought that movie was so boring, I could feel brain cells dying. I left that piece of garbage 30 minutes in and got a refund on the ticket.HuddledMass said:10,000 BC... I've never ever walked out on a movie before ( or after ) this... I've sat through some terrible movies, I've bought some terrible movies... but I've never been forced out of my chair like I have with that pile of garbage