i've read all of Tolkien's books, cept for the latest two of them, they're on my list to read, probly after i finish the Dresden files in a couple weeks
You're completely right. I just mean that he compiled many of these fantastic creatures and stuff, and put it all into one structured mythology, he really DEFINED certain aspects of these beings, and that's been more or less ripped on by literally every traditional fantasy writer since. To the point where you might as well say that traditional fantasy (at least in my view) is synonymous with 'tolkein-mythos fantasy'.shewolf51 said:I read the Lord of the Rings and loved it. I've also read The Hobbit and The Silmarillion.
Actually, some of his mythology (certain races), come from default fantasy mythology. Halflings already existed in fantasy, but he gave them a new name and put a new spin on them.AgentNein said:Overall pretty uneven and bloated series in my opinion. Not to get flamed, it just didn't do much for me. Plus everybody rips off his goddamned mythology, which really bugs me (although that is of course not his fault).
Uruk-Hai are completely his as far as I know. But orcs and goblins are once again part of default fantasy mythology.
*Aneurysm*Beardon65 said:reeding iz 4 n00bz
JK, but no. Why read the book when you have the movies and the game?