Hello America, one question. Why do you ruin all your best television shows?

Recommended Videos
Dec 14, 2009
15,526
0
0
Wow they sure are generous with the usernames said:
Daystar Clarion said:
Wow they sure are generous with the usernames said:
As America, I'd like to apologize for ruining Skins. Sorry about that.
No need to apologise. It was shit before it got to America.

Terrible, hipster, angsty bullshit that it was.
Oh come now, Series 1 and 2 weren't half bad. The rest I couldn't care less about, but the first couple had their moments.

Also, pre-emptive congrats on 4k posts
Heh, thanks for pointing that out, I shall be sure to something important to mark such an occassi...

Oh my god! What am I doing!
 

Ironic Pirate

New member
May 21, 2009
5,544
0
0
As far as I can tell, British TV is more like a mini-series, where there's a set story that's told through the course of a few seasons, whereas American TV is a continuous story told for as long as the show can stay popular.

Usually, at least.
 

bl4ckh4wk64

Walking Mass Effect Codex
Jun 11, 2010
1,277
0
0
Because eventually certain mothers, mostly from California, happen to think these television shows are "corrupting our children." They move to have them removed and viola, there they go.
 
Dec 14, 2009
15,526
0
0
Witty Name Here said:
Daystar Clarion said:
Witty Name Here said:
Daystar Clarion said:
(and by the way, in America we refer to them as 'seasons' not series.)

Well it doesn't happen all the time, sometimes we have amazingly great shows that get canceled before their time, like Samurai Jack.


It's a shame really, I started out with high hopes for "Heroes" but then it all sort of went downhill, "Wait, how about we let Sylar live guys?! YEAH! WE CAN CHANGE HIM!" I mean, if they just got rid of Sylar, stabilized the plot so that it didn't get obsessed with each of it's thousands of characters backstories, then it probably would have had high hopes.
Really? You quoted me to point out semantics?


Thanks.
Sorry if that seemed stupid or whatever, just pointing it out.

Either way, we hate it in america as well, it's starting to seem like TV networks are purposely killing off their shows so they can replace them with "Reality" shows like Jersey Shore or whatever. Cartoon Network tried doing it during their whole "CN Real" fiasco, it didn't work out that well for them.
No problem, and I totally agree. This thread certainly isn't a dig at America, quite the opposite, the US have churned out so many incredible TV shows, I just hate to see them ruined by a desire for more money rather than trying to write something better.
 

Joshimodo

New member
Sep 13, 2008
1,956
0
0
Atmos Duality said:
I haven't dedicated any time to a series on TV in over 7 years; everything sucks now.

Not quite. House is still fairly good (though it's not as amusing as it once was), Boardwalk Empire is fantastic, Dexter is great, and The Walking Dead is fairly good.

Also, check out Life and The Wire. Both incredible shows which have now ended.
 

t3h br0th3r

New member
May 7, 2009
294
0
0
dude. Only white people liked friends. or seinfeld for that matter. Monty python is also really over hyped
 

Wintermute_

New member
Sep 20, 2010
437
0
0
Daystar Clarion said:
not to be argumentative but Scrubs should not be on that list. it is one of the funniest shows I've had the pleasure to watch, and the one of the more creative. they actually ended the plot on a very definitive note: JD and Elliot are together, JD goes to other hospital, Turk is chief of surgery married to Carla, JD has kid Sam, and even Janitor gets married. Everyone has their lives, and because JD moves on, series ends. I do not count that bullshit continuation they tried to pull off with the new girl main character. That ran for like 4 episodes and died.

ANyway, you are otherwise totally correct. We milk 'em till they are bleed dry, because there's money in it. Sadly, the major corporations that "own" the shows would rather have the writers pump out crap until its not profitable anymore, rather then risk dumping money into a new creative show. Fox is biggest sinner in this regard. god... everything Fox does angers me...
 

Jamboxdotcom

New member
Nov 3, 2010
1,276
0
0
Daystar Clarion said:
Now I understand that popular shows make a lot of money and it's for that reason that they keep going for as long as they do, but don't the writers want their shows to be remembered for being great? Not 'that one show that started great and then was pretty shit for several years'.

Here in Britian, shows like Fawlty Towers and Blackadder, while very popular, only ran for 2 and 4 series respectively. You can gurantee that if any of those two shows were to suddenly return with a new season, their ratings would soar. But they won't return any time soon, for one reason. The writers don't want to write a new series for the sake of writing a new series, they want their work to be just as funny as it's always been, not churning out some forced plot just for the sake of it.

It's certainly the safe option, milking a series for all it's worth (let's not forget how guilty the video game industry is that), but it saddens me to see so many good shows(say what you want about America, but they have some damn good TV shows) die, when they could have finished with a bang and always be remembered as a great series.

So, fellow escapist, what are your thoughts on the matter?
i bolded the question wherein you actually answer yourself, albeit indirectly. basically, long-running series in the US are not written by a small stable of writers. shows like the Simpsons and Scrubs have been written by probably hundreds of different people. initially they may have only a few writers, but as those writers get bored/run out of ideas/demand a bigger paycheck, they are replaced by "fresh talent" that may be wholly wrong for the material they are writing. for more on that concept, read some of Warren Ellis' thoughts on comic book franchises.
 

Hatchet90

New member
Nov 15, 2009
705
0
0
The Office, Community, The Soup, 30 Rock, Parks and Recreation. Nothing much better than NBC on Thursday nights.
 

omicron1

New member
Mar 26, 2008
1,729
0
0
Myself, I prefer to focus on the ones they didn't ruin - like MacGyver and Numb3rs. Partially because if I consider Firefly I go all teary-eyed... *sob* but mostly because I'd prefer to focus on the positive.
 

creothes

New member
Oct 18, 2010
65
0
0
star gate atlantis why why why it was great and replased with a shit show star gate univers why why why
 

drisky

New member
Mar 16, 2009
1,605
0
0
It's simply because they will make shows as long as people watch them, long after the people making it still care. So you keep getting bad seasons after actors and writers leave because its still profitable. It is not so bad because it doesn't ruin the earlier stuff, but it does make it so the show makes proper closure while it is still good, and that is the most unfortunate part.
 
Dec 14, 2009
15,526
0
0
Jamboxdotcom said:
Daystar Clarion said:
Now I understand that popular shows make a lot of money and it's for that reason that they keep going for as long as they do, but don't the writers want their shows to be remembered for being great? Not 'that one show that started great and then was pretty shit for several years'.

Here in Britian, shows like Fawlty Towers and Blackadder, while very popular, only ran for 2 and 4 series respectively. You can gurantee that if any of those two shows were to suddenly return with a new season, their ratings would soar. But they won't return any time soon, for one reason. The writers don't want to write a new series for the sake of writing a new series, they want their work to be just as funny as it's always been, not churning out some forced plot just for the sake of it.

It's certainly the safe option, milking a series for all it's worth (let's not forget how guilty the video game industry is that), but it saddens me to see so many good shows(say what you want about America, but they have some damn good TV shows) die, when they could have finished with a bang and always be remembered as a great series.

So, fellow escapist, what are your thoughts on the matter?
i bolded the question wherein you actually answer yourself, albeit indirectly. basically, long-running series in the US are not written by a small stable of writers. shows like the Simpsons and Scrubs have been written by probably hundreds of different people. initially they may have only a few writers, but as those writers get bored/run out of ideas/demand a bigger paycheck, they are replaced by "fresh talent" that may be wholly wrong for the material they are writing. for more on that concept, read some of Warren Ellis' thoughts on comic book franchises.
I suppose that's what differentiates American TV from British TV. Our shows tend to be written by small groups of people, who have spent countless hours on something they love and don't want to ruin it by adding a series that they don't have to. Not that the American writers don't love the series they are working on, but I suppose with so many people working on it, the quality will get diluted, as well as the best interests of the series and its characters.
 

JezebelinHell

New member
Dec 9, 2010
405
0
0
EcoEclipse said:
PS. Is anyone else really pissed that they cancelled Flashforward?
Talk about being left hanging. :(
I think the BBC has left me hanging for some shows too. Paradox and Apparitions come to mind, there are others I cannot recall at this point.
 

Carlston

New member
Apr 8, 2008
1,554
0
0
Other than tv exec basically when they know they have a hit, at times they sabotage the show and cancel it two seasons in if the director or actors want more money.

The sad reason we will never have a hit like MASH again, yet the Simpsons is STILL on...
 

Canid117

New member
Oct 6, 2009
4,075
0
0
Because the show goes on too long and the writers run out of ideas or are replaced by cheaper but less talented alternates. It's not that we don't know how to maintain shows its that we don't know how to let them go when we are supposed to.
 

Jamboxdotcom

New member
Nov 3, 2010
1,276
0
0
Daystar Clarion said:
I suppose that's what differentiates American TV from British TV. Our shows tend to be written by small groups of people, who have spent countless hours on something they love and don't want to ruin it by adding a series that they don't have to. Not that the American writers don't love the series they are working on, but I suppose with so many people working on it, the quality will get diluted, as well as the best interests of the series and its characters.
yup, that's pretty much exactly the point i was trying to make. it's really the same thing with American comic books vs. manga. all manga (afaik) is finite. even long-running (even, arguably far too long-running) series like Naruto will eventually end. not so much something like Superman. no matter how many times they kill a superhero in an American comic, they never really end, at least as long as people are still reading them.

it all goes into intellectual property debates. despite being the country that fights hardest to prevent media piracy, America actually has an almost communist view of most IP. (ok, that may be taking it far to compare corporations to communism, but whatever...). even if an IP is "owned" by one or two people, there is often a corporation that has a controlling stake in said IP, and they will continue to milk it ad nauseum, with a revolving crew of writers.
 

Daveman

has tits and is on fire
Jan 8, 2009
4,202
0
0
Dester makes up for everything... although I have yet to see Season 5.