The economic problems are private, not with the government (ok, there's a deficit, but the recession is private). There are many more important things, like the many companies collapsing. Care to try again?
This war is not as big as WW2 and I would hardly call this a war anymore, it's random skirmishes in the Middle East, it was meant as a joke and it did fix the great depression. Also, I am not american, nor do I have anything agaisnt the general american.BudZer said:We're already at war. It's destroying our economy because we can so efficiently make tanks and weapons and things that make it so that it's impossible to achieve a wartime economy high.chstens said:Let us solve this they way America solved the Great Depression: LET'S GO TO WAR! Do I hear WW3? It will save the economy! TO ARMS, FOLKS!
Sindre1 said:I agree.........*FACEPALM*bodyklok said:I think we need a little facepalm in this thread.WrongSprite said:I....christ...no.
Bad.
What exactly is Class B? Similar to Schedule II in the US?Eskay said:Actually its because they upgraded pot to a class B drug. All the stockbrokers sobered up and freaked out when they realised they didn't know the hell was going on.
Actually, by technical terms we are not. No declaration was ever passed, just extensions of the limits on the executive power. The media uses the term to jazz it up for common folk.BudZer said:We're already at war.chstens said:Let us solve this they way America solved the Great Depression: LET'S GO TO WAR! Do I hear WW3? It will save the economy! TO ARMS, FOLKS!
Awesomeness!Madrak the Red said:BRILLIANCE! The key is drugs. We legalise all drugs, sell them in chemists at heavily taxed prices. The governement gets all the money and BAM economy saved. All the people stupid enough to actually take the drugs then die of overdose and we are left with a perfect, rich nation of only the brightest (and poorest, but the kill-squads can deal with them)people on the planet. And then I shall BE YOUR KING. ALL HAIL TO KING MADRAK.
On the other side of the coin, if no one were to smoke, more people would live longer and incur just as much in healthcare costs because they're old and feeble. We don't need people to live longer.Skeleon said:In the end, smoking is more costly to the country than not smoking.
Treatments, sick-leave and palliative medicine are expensive.
Which is why the German government raised the retirement age from 65 to 67.traukanshaku said:On the other side of the coin, if no one were to smoke, more people would live longer and incur just as much in healthcare costs because they're old and feeble. We don't need people to live longer.![]()
Unfortunately, the pervasive attitude of old people is that they've "paid their dues" and they expect the younger generation to support them out of some kind of gratitude. I'm not saying all of them are like this, but living in South Florida ( America's retirement community ), I see a lot of it. I think longevity research is a horrible idea. :[Skeleon said:Which is why the German government raised the retirement age from 65 to 67.traukanshaku said:On the other side of the coin, if no one were to smoke, more people would live longer and incur just as much in healthcare costs because they're old and feeble. We don't need people to live longer.![]()
Healthy people can work and pay taxes.
Even old, healthy people.
Old =/= feeble.
Old + smokes + is fat like a tub of lard = feeble.
LMAOEskay said:Actually its because they upgraded pot to a class B drug. All the stockbrokers sobered up and freaked out when they realised they didn't know the hell was going on.