So long as they keep their cocks away from my arse and don't try hitting on me??......then they are fine in my books.
Ah, makes sense, I suppose.Dana22 said:Because I prefer traditional model of family, with male and female parent. Simple as that.A Raging Emo said:Why's that, may I ask? (This isn't trying to be rude by the way, I am genuinely interested)Dana22 said:I support the civil partnership and marriage of homosexuals but Im against children adoption.
On Topic: I myself am Bisexual. I prefer women (I can say I find it better with women, as I have spent... *Ahem* Time with both Women and other Men), but I'll bat for both teams; naturally, I shall have no problems with Homosexuals.
Omg I love you. Seriously.Prof.Wood said:Let me see, Homosexuality is perfectly fine with me if it's not shoved in my face.
Now if that offends anyone I feel the same about heterosexuality, I don't know why it just makes me feel awkward to see people sucking face.
Except it doesn't, because children rarely get adopted as it is, and besides that, a recent study shows that children of homosexual couples are actually more well-adjusted and happier than children of hetero couples. So... wtf people.A Raging Emo said:Ah, makes sense, I suppose.Dana22 said:Because I prefer traditional model of family, with male and female parent. Simple as that.A Raging Emo said:Why's that, may I ask? (This isn't trying to be rude by the way, I am genuinely interested)Dana22 said:I support the civil partnership and marriage of homosexuals but Im against children adoption.
On Topic: I myself am Bisexual. I prefer women (I can say I find it better with women, as I have spent... *Ahem* Time with both Women and other Men), but I'll bat for both teams; naturally, I shall have no problems with Homosexuals.
The rights granted by civil partnership are identical in every way to "marriage". The only difference is that, legally speaking, you cannot call it marriage. It's bullshit semantics, but the rights still stand.Disaster Button said:I always that gay marrige was legal in the UK, oh well.
Its just attraction, no big deal.
Not to mention that overpopulation is absolutely a pressing problem.zerofan said:Gay partnerships are the PERFECT partnerships to help the current world. Since there are so many straight couples who have kids they don't want. Why not let the ones who can't have kids, who want them, look after them?
Hurr Durr
Yeah, that's what I was also implying.rockyoumonkeys said:Not to mention that overpopulation is absolutely a pressing problem.zerofan said:Gay partnerships are the PERFECT partnerships to help the current world. Since there are so many straight couples who have kids they don't want. Why not let the ones who can't have kids, who want them, look after them?
Hurr Durr
I do not believe that one "is" gay, I see it as a mental illness or deviation that must be treated or worked out in therapy.Josdeb said:That is of course assuming that that person "wants" to be homosexual and take away their genes from the pool. That logic is flawed however: If a person wanted a child so badly as to want to adopt one, why would they "choose" to be gay?Hashime said:I am against homosexuality, but I am not homophobic, as I do not fear homosexuals. I just don't value their life choices.
If a person wants to take themselves out of the genetic pool so be it, but the second they decide to adopt and screw up a child I draw the line.
Therefore, they have not chosen thier sexuality.
Also, how does a child get "screwed up" by gay parents?
Well no offence, but your opinion is wrong. Proven wrong.Hashime said:I do not believe that one "is" gay, I see it as a mental illness or deviation that must be treated or worked out in therapy.
You should have put this at the beginning of your post and saved us all the trouble of reading it.Hashime said:Now as for citations, unfortunately I gathered this information for a discussion and didn't get citations.
Hey, I will find where I got the data when I have more time. You wouldn't happen to know what the wave form equation describing the 2s orbital of hydrogen is?rockyoumonkeys said:You should have put this at the beginning of your post and saved us all the trouble of reading it.Hashime said:Now as for citations, unfortunately I gathered this information for a discussion and didn't get citations.
I was born gay and have been out for about half my life now. I do not wish to change, I do not need to be treated and in all my years in the GLBTQ community, from student organisations onwards, I have not met a person who wants to be "treated". Being gay is as much a part of me as my blue eyes and the colour of my hair.Hashime said:I do not believe that one "is" gay, I see it as a mental illness or deviation that must be treated or worked out in therapy. )
Fully aware your sexuality has no bareing on your perantal abilitys. I'd much rather a Gay couple bring up a child lovingly then some neglectful asshole of a parent, that Gay couple deserve a child hell of a lot more than the shitty parents who don't give a damn.UnmotivatedSlacker said:If you make it a point to avoid gay people, I'm pretty sure you've haven't outgrown your homophobia. Also what basis do you have that a gay person would be any worse of parent than a straight person? Because I've seen some straight people who are absolutely horrible parents.Darkgoosey666 said:Agreed. Im not as homophobic as i used to be, i guess i outgrew that sort of thing. I do avoid gay guys in real life though. sorry if that offends, but i aint gonna lie. On the internet i will talk to anyone if they seem cool, its hard to be in your face over the the internet though i guess.Valkyrie101 said:I don't agree with gay adoption though,
I guess its that i only knew two gay guys and they were really in your face and stereotypical and really annoyed me. i guess its unfair to pigeon hole all homosexuals because of them but thats how it is.This applies to everyone who has a problem with homosexual people adopting kids. Your sexuality has absolutely no bearing on your ability as a parent. Nor will it affect the childs sexuality. "Why don't I have a Mummy and Daddy,": Oh no, a child asking a question. They surely couldn't talk to the child and explain it, no that would require effort. Also being gay is completely natural. It happens in nature all of the time. How can something that occurs in nature be unnatural?FamoFunk said:I'm not speaking for Dana22, but biologialy, only a Male and Female can reproduce, two Females and two Males cannot reproduce together (this is, they were born Male and Female) so it's deemed un-natural I guess?.Vault Citizen said:Why?Dana22 said:I support the civil partnership and marriage of homosexuals but Im against children adoption.
Then prehaps we have the child asking "Why don't I have a Mummy and Daddy" (of different sex)
I've never actually seen a same sex couple raise a child etc. but I would much rather a same sex couple raise a child in a loving, caring, safe enviroment than the biological sperm doner and carrier abuse the child, show it no love and affection and neglect it.
Unfortunately you are wrong. The vast majority of the population is not gay, meaning being gay is a deviation from the world wide norm. As of such homosexuality can be considered a mental illness. It isn't normal to think everyone is out to get you either.zerofan said:Well no offence, but your opinion is wrong. Proven wrong.Hashime said:I do not believe that one "is" gay, I see it as a mental illness or deviation that must be treated or worked out in therapy.
But you may think of it what you like so long as you don't press it on others *roll eyes*
You just like the people who happen to be gay more than the straight people you know. I know I like more straight people than gays but that's because most of the gay people I know are twats...Harmondale2 said:Go gays!
I have a lot more fun most of the time with my gay friends then my straight friends, no offence to straight people of course, you guys are alright![]()