I don't have it because it's popular, over-promoted, or prevalent. I hate it because it was just so boring.Copper Zen said:The Blair Witch Project is a penultimate example of the horror being inside your head. It was enormously successful because of this.
Then, when it got old after a couple of years, people started hating on it the way people do on anything that's really popular and over-promoted or so prevalent that you just get sick of hearing about it's existence.
Doesn't she also kill a load of newborn infants before the events of the book and a sheriff during? Sounds like a serial killer to me.Vault101 said:Misery
yes they did make an (aprently decent) movie BUT the book is better
its about an author trapped in a house with his 1# fan who is crazy,
Man, I so read this as "Harry Potter and the Serial Killer Maniac". Um, can someone make this happen now? I want to see/read it.GunsmithKitten said:Henry: Portrait of a Serial Killer
Maniac
that is ture...but neither work is a "serial killer/slasher" piece...its a psychological thriller (and a damn good one)Gottesstrafe said:Doesn't she also kill a load of newborn infants before the events of the book and a sheriff during? Sounds like a serial killer to me.
Heh, actually that's...DoPo said:Man, I so read this as "Harry Potter and the Serial Killer Maniac". Um, can someone make this happen now? I want to see/read it.GunsmithKitten said:Henry: Portrait of a Serial Killer
Maniac
She has killed 2 or more people with quite a bit of time passing between each killing and psychological gratification being her main motivation. That is literally the definition of a serial killer. Combine that with all the infants she killed in the same time frame and she's also a spree killer (though never convicted). Paul Shelden is an author who happens to find himself the prisoner of a rabid fan AND serial killer, not just a rabid fan. If it was just a rabid fan who went crazy, the film/novel would've focused on a more subtle antagonist slowly manipulating him into fulfilling her desires, probably also suffering from a touch of Münchausen syndrome.Vault101 said:that is ture...but neither work is a "serial killer/slasher" piece...its a psychological thriller (and a damn good one)Gottesstrafe said:Doesn't she also kill a load of newborn infants before the events of the book and a sheriff during? Sounds like a serial killer to me.
speaking of psychological thrillers theres also "hard candy"...lets just say if your a guy it may go into "horror"
They never focus on themenough, though. And I'd like to see an actual serial killer, not the shadow of Voldy just looming over there when everybody denies it (although, that does sound remarkably like a horror movie).thaluikhain said:Heh, actually that's...DoPo said:Man, I so read this as "Harry Potter and the Serial Killer Maniac". Um, can someone make this happen now? I want to see/read it.GunsmithKitten said:Henry: Portrait of a Serial Killer
Maniac
Nah, that's almost what the books are like, only the serial killer maniac are werewolves or wizards or both.
What about the werewolf that liked mauling kids? Or the snatchers? Not mentioned that much, though, and not really that scary when eveyrone else is anyway.DoPo said:They never focus on themenough, though. And I'd like to see an actual serial killer, not the shadow of Voldy just looming over there when everybody denies it (although, that does sound remarkably like a horror movie).
The story is about Harry and co doing stuff. They aren't actively gravitating around them, the way a title of "Harry Potter and the Serial Killer Maniac" would suggest things would go.thaluikhain said:What about the werewolf that liked mauling kids? Or the snatchers?DoPo said:They never focus on themenough, though. And I'd like to see an actual serial killer, not the shadow of Voldy just looming over there when everybody denies it (although, that does sound remarkably like a horror movie).
Precisely, imagine what the serial killer would need to do, to have a whole story focused on him (or her). The title speaks volumes you somehow ignored.thaluikhain said:Not mentioned that much, though, and not really that scary when eveyrone else is anyway.
yeah...I'm not denying she isGottesstrafe said:She has killed 2 or more people with quite a bit of time passing between each killing and psychological gratification being her main motivation. That is literally the definition of a serial killer. Combine that with all the infants she killed in the same time frame and she's also a spree killer (though never convicted). Paul Shelden is an author who happens to find himself the prisoner of a rabid fan AND serial killer, not just a rabid fan. If it was just a rabid fan who went crazy, the film/novel would've focused on a more subtle antagonist slowly manipulating him into fulfilling her desires, probably also suffering from a touch of Münchausen syndrome.