How come Japan gets better media treatment?

Recommended Videos

ShadowsofHope

Outsider
Nov 1, 2009
2,623
0
0
TheDist said:
How's about instead of praying for any of them, we send money, supplies and experts to actualy help? just a thought...
This man took the words out of my mouth.

I really don't care if you don't want to hear that "praying is useless", but.. it is. At least, in a physical, tangible way of helping. Psychologically? Sure, argue the heck away. *Shrug*

Also, Japan is in much more need of assistance than New Zealand. Not to downplay tragedy, but New Zealand is actually holding together. Japan is.. well, losing it's grip. So, yeah.
 

MrTub

New member
Mar 12, 2009
1,742
0
0
EllEzDee said:
Is Atheism the "cool" thing now?
Yep cause if a lot of people are something you do not like it must be a "cool" thing. Ofc..
 

The_Echo

New member
Mar 18, 2009
3,253
0
0
Well... the 'quake in Japan moved the island a good eight inches or so, and managed to change the angle of the planet's axis. THAT is why people are freaking over Japan. It was a big fucking earthquake.

And of course, there's the radiation leakage and floods and whatnot.
EllEzDee said:
Is Atheism the "cool" thing now?
The majority of atheists--especially on the Internet--tend to hate on and/or generally put down theism. It's not the "cool thing" to be atheist. It's the "cool thing" to hate on stuff that's popular. I'd like to say that a good percentage of "atheists" are actually just anti-theist, or more specifically, anti-Christian.
 

Mark-SJ

New member
Nov 18, 2009
5
0
0
EcoEclipse said:
I'd like to say that a good percentage of "atheists" are actually just anti-theist, or more specifically, anti-Christian.
Too true. When's the last time you saw a thread in the Religion and Politics section about how Buddhists or Hindus suck?
 

skywalkerlion

New member
Jun 21, 2009
1,259
0
0
ITT: People who think that people who pray never donate money. *clap clap clap*

And I, for one, prayed for both New Zealand and Japan.
 

Paksenarrion

New member
Mar 13, 2009
2,911
0
0
Matt_LRR said:
there's also the fact that the Japanese earthquake was substantially more severe. Not to downplay the christchruch quake, but we're talking a factor of 10,000 in terms of difference in relative magnitude.

-m
That's quite a substantial difference in severity-...wait a minute.

Not to downplay the christchruch quake, but we're talking a factor of 10,000 in terms of difference in relative magnitude.
we're talking a factor of 10,000 in terms of difference in relative magnitude.
we're talking a factor of 10,000
a factor of 10,000
Vegeta! What does the Richter Scale say about the quake's power level?
 

gostlyfantom

New member
Jan 22, 2011
405
0
0
Paksenarrion said:
Matt_LRR said:
there's also the fact that the Japanese earthquake was substantially more severe. Not to downplay the christchruch quake, but we're talking a factor of 10,000 in terms of difference in relative magnitude.

-m
That's quite a substantial difference in severity-...wait a minute.

Not to downplay the christchruch quake, but we're talking a factor of 10,000 in terms of difference in relative magnitude.
we're talking a factor of 10,000 in terms of difference in relative magnitude.
we're talking a factor of 10,000
a factor of 10,000
Vegeta! What does the Richter Scale say about the quake's power level?
ITS OVER 9000!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
 

Cool Welshy

New member
Mar 15, 2011
189
0
0
And another thing...

I live in Australia, and even before Japan and New Zealand, we had a bit of hell as well. Floods on one side, fires on the other and a bunch of cyclones. The same treatment happened there as well! In australia, of course was big news, and here as well since Yahtzee was stuck in the flood, but I checked other sites... little to nothing!
 

Faladorian

New member
May 3, 2010
635
0
0
Mark-SJ said:
EcoEclipse said:
I'd like to say that a good percentage of "atheists" are actually just anti-theist, or more specifically, anti-Christian.
Too true. When's the last time you saw a thread in the Religion and Politics section about how Buddhists or Hindus suck?
There's a reason for that.

The Buddhists and Hindus don't drown "witches" or fly planes into buildings.
 

Kortney

New member
Nov 2, 2009
1,960
0
0
Cool Welshy said:
Okay, before the angry brigade fight me down, let me explain.

Before what happened in Japan, there was an earthquake in New Zealand. when I checked around some websites. Some hardly even mentioned it. But when the earthquake hit in Japan, these same sites are i an uproar!

Granted, the nuclear meltdowns and tsunamis made it worse, but did we know an earthquake in Japan is happening that was going to cause that when it hit? No. Then where are the PRAY FOR NEW ZEALAND articles?

EDIT: Or GIVE NEW ZEALAND MONEY AND HELP ARTICLES. There. No more snarky comments on how prayers are useless, please.
I mean absolutely no disrespect to you here, and I can certainly empathise with you and I realise how damaging the Christchurch earthquake was to thousands of New Zealand families - but the Japanese earthquake was thousands of times more severe. This is why it has gotten more attention.
 

Sightless Wisdom

Resident Cynic
Jul 24, 2009
2,552
0
0
If you want to draw attention to s serious issue, don't use a religious activity. For anything. Regardless of what you do or what you believe, prayer does not physically change anything. That's all there is to it. I'm not a troll, I'm not stating the atheistic point of view to seem "cool" I'm just saying, you doomed this topic to fall into stupid anti-religious arguments.

That aside, Japan has a much larger population, it contributes heavily to western society in terms of essentially everything, and the magnitude of the earthquake and the consequent tsunamis was much higher than that which occurred in New Zealand.

It's a shame that less attention was payed when people in New Zealand were suffering due to natural disaster, but it's easy to see why it was the case. Not only that, but it makes more sense statistically that more people would be worried or aware when it comes to disaster in Japan, it just affects so many more people indirectly.
 

Cool Welshy

New member
Mar 15, 2011
189
0
0
You know what? I'm re-writing the question to make sure people understand what I'm getting at. DURING New Zealand's time of need, or even other countries' BEFORE Japan's, there wasn't as much as Japan. Not knowing that there was going to be an earthquake, Why is that?

In fact, if Japan's earthquake didn't happen, would you feel more sorry for the countries before?
 

Sandytimeman

Brain Freeze...yay!
Jan 14, 2011
729
0
0
Don't feel bad I don't really pray for anyone. But your right it should happen equally for everyone.
 

Bags159

New member
Mar 11, 2011
1,250
0
0
skywalkerlion said:
ITT: People who think that people who pray never donate money. *clap clap clap* .
I have seen no such evidence of this claim. I have seen people say that prayer does nothing, but I have not seen people say that people who pray do not donate money.
 

Dango

New member
Feb 11, 2010
21,066
0
0
Cool Welshy said:
In fact, if Japan's earthquake didn't happen, would you feel more sorry for the countries before?
To be honest, no. But that's only because I know fairly little about them. Besides the earthquake being larger, American media cared more about Japan's earthquakes because it's one of America's most trusted allies, which means a lot more political controversy, which leads to (and I hate saying this) more viewers and more income for everyone working in the news business. But still, the magnitude of the quake is a much stronger reason than the money, people here in America seem to be genuinely concerned (and as many who live in America can tell you, that's saying something).
 

Mark-SJ

New member
Nov 18, 2009
5
0
0
Bags159 said:
skywalkerlion said:
ITT: People who think that people who pray never donate money. *clap clap clap* .
I have seen no such evidence of this claim. I have seen people say that prayer does nothing, but I have not seen people say that people who pray do not donate money.
They're implying the people praying are doing just that, and therefore, nothing to help.
 

Cool Welshy

New member
Mar 15, 2011
189
0
0
Dango said:
Cool Welshy said:
In fact, if Japan's earthquake didn't happen, would you feel more sorry for the countries before?
To be honest, no. But that's only because I know fairly little about them. Besides the earthquake being larger, American media cared more about Japan's earthquakes because it's one of America's most trusted allies, which means a lot more political controversy, which leads to (and I hate saying this) more viewers and more income for everyone working in the news business. But still, the magnitude of the quake is a much stronger reason than the money, people here in America seem to be genuinely concerned (and as many who live in America can tell you, that's saying something).
Thank you Dango. But what about Australia? We had a large amount of drama earlier this year and we're your allies too, right? Did we get a story?