How do you imagine the world by 2050?

Recommended Videos

The Ambrosian

Paperboy
May 9, 2009
487
0
0
The Cheezy One said:
The Ambrosian said:
Even so, very under-rated. The shooting isn't too bad, the only bad thing is the occasional glitch, well too me anyway.
Next to modern day console shooters, it is definitely an experience to be had. Especially as in-depth console games such as this and bioshock are few and far between.
Reminds me of how under-rated singularity is. It's not the best but I really enjoyed it...
You know, i'm gonna go play Metro, i'm only like four hours in.
 

icame

New member
Aug 4, 2010
2,649
0
0
I am the leader of the one of groups of humans on earth. The human race has been annihilated by the aliens from the planet Zernut. They are bulky with huge claws and fangs that can tear through metal and they have octopus like tentacles with thorns the size of a child's arm coming of their backs. They used an airbourne virus that only humans with a small genetic abnormality could survive for any longer than a few hours. We were able to send out to send out a distress signal calling for aid and warning them to use air masks to our fleet halfway across our solar system while the aliens were looking for survivors. We hide now in an abandoned government safe house. All we can do is wait, a hope that our fleet gets here soon.

Or maybe it'll be the same, who knows. Here's hoping for personal hovercrafts.
 

Viking Incognito

Master Headsplitter
Nov 8, 2009
1,924
0
0
It will probably be quite different in either a technological or political way. Not sure about much beyond that
 

Tinneh

New member
Oct 10, 2009
1,059
0
0
PoisonUnagi said:
What we need is some very real, very sad genocide. Or infertility. If we can half or third the world's population over the course of a couple years, then we should be good. And use the Chinese child policy - no more than 2 children per family, with the obvious exception of triplets.

If that doesn't ensue, then, well, there go our resources.
Just nuke the African continent, nobody likes those guys anyway. Hell, as long as North America, Europe, and Australia are still around I'd be happy.
 

MegaManOfNumbers

New member
Mar 3, 2010
1,326
0
0
pyrosaw said:
World? What world? We would have eithr bombed each other to death, or the big corporations bought out the government. Okay maybe not the last option, but I want 2050 to be cyberpunk-ish.
the sad part is, your 1st prediction is probably true.

I believe the world would be BORDERLINE cyberpunk, with certain technologies very high tech, but others still retained.

something like the Neon Genesis Evangelion/Rebuild of Evangelion universe... with less giant biohumans and alien angels trying to kill us.
 

Blind Sight

New member
May 16, 2010
1,658
0
0
Time for the mandatory Doktor Sleepless quote about how we're living in 'the future' now and need to stop bitching about not having jetpacks:


I predict vat-grown meat and AR constructs intergraded into society.
 

Kayevcee

New member
Mar 5, 2008
391
0
0
Speaking of moon colonies, I believe Japan is already working on plans to construct a facility there to mine helium-3, which is a fusion by-product that... aw hell, if you want to learn about it you can wiki it. Suffice to say it's a tremendous source of power and if it can be mined and transferred safely then it could solve a lot of problems on Earth. I'm actually doing a literature review at uni right now on methods for using bacteria to generate hydrogen from sewage- there's some amazing work going on right now on enzymes, photocatalysis, nanotech and customised life-forms coming down the pipe (sometimes literally) that could well revolutionise the energy industry in the coming decades.

If we can restrain the supervillain-esque urges of Monsanto and their ilk we may be able to turn genetic modification of food crops into something that can keep everybody alive and healthy while we sort out our population issues. According to David Attenborough (who got his information from reliable anthropologists) the best ways to reduce the number of children a couple have are:
1) Reduce poverty- if you have more cash you don't need as many kids to support you in old age
2) Provide education for girls, encouraging them to find work and marry later (if at all)
3) Barrier contraceptives, baby (no pun intended)
It's going to require some big changes in attitude, but it can be done. It'll have to be done.

On the more techy side of things, we're fast approaching the technological singularity- in the next 5-10 years artificial intelligence will supercede natural intelligence and we may find that our creations and their truly "outsider" perspectives will help us to take a better look at ourselves. Sharing the planet with something smarter than us might inject some much needed humility into our assorted leaders and CEOs. Or it'll be war against the machines, but peace would be so much more interesting :)

On a personal level... I dunno. Cranial implants? Babelfish 2.0 installed in children to let them understand and (sort of) speak all languages? Brain mods to make us hyper-intelligent? The internet 3.0 and beyond redefining the concepts of 'intelligence' and 'education' to reflect the limitless knowledge available online to anyone who knows how to find it? If the internet has taught us anything, it's that whatever's coming will be moe amazing and more bizarre than anything we've come up with so far.

And, of course, we'll all be old duffers by then and whatever the future does bring we'll look upon it with disdain and tell our grandkids that it was so much better in our day when if you wanted to beat a virtual hooker to death you had to at least pick up a controller...


-Nick
 

The Cheezy One

Christian. Take that from me.
Dec 13, 2008
1,912
0
0
The Ambrosian said:
The Cheezy One said:
The Ambrosian said:
Even so, very under-rated. The shooting isn't too bad, the only bad thing is the occasional glitch, well too me anyway.
Next to modern day console shooters, it is definitely an experience to be had. Especially as in-depth console games such as this and bioshock are few and far between.
Reminds me of how under-rated singularity is. It's not the best but I really enjoyed it...
You know, i'm gonna go play Metro, i'm only like four hours in.
I was well up for getting singularity, but i try to limit myself for games, and it was that or the cheaper Dark Void, another enjoyable, if short, game. Playing it, you can see what yahtzee says about it running out of stuff. A plot point is hyped up majorly, then never turns up again. A character says something ominous, but nothing comes of it.
I'll get sungularity soon though.
And go for Metro! I'll have another play through too at some point!
 

The Ambrosian

Paperboy
May 9, 2009
487
0
0
The Cheezy One said:
The Ambrosian said:
The Cheezy One said:
The Ambrosian said:
Even so, very under-rated. The shooting isn't too bad, the only bad thing is the occasional glitch, well too me anyway.
Next to modern day console shooters, it is definitely an experience to be had. Especially as in-depth console games such as this and bioshock are few and far between.
Reminds me of how under-rated singularity is. It's not the best but I really enjoyed it...
You know, i'm gonna go play Metro, i'm only like four hours in.
I was well up for getting singularity, but i try to limit myself for games, and it was that or the cheaper Dark Void, another enjoyable, if short, game. Playing it, you can see what yahtzee says about it running out of stuff. A plot point is hyped up majorly, then never turns up again. A character says something ominous, but nothing comes of it.
I'll get sungularity soon though.
And go for Metro! I'll have another play through too at some point!
Singularity is great except for those damned phase-ticks.
And I played the Dark Void demo and couldn't stand it. I thought it played pretty bad. That might be just me though.
 

Ham_authority95

New member
Dec 8, 2009
3,496
0
0
RUINER ACTUAL said:
Ham_authority95 said:
Besides more advanced technology and higher standards of living, it's impossible to tell.

Although I can safely say that we'll be safe from any over-population because of standards of living in both the Third World(which probably won't exist by that time) and the First World.

More education and prosperity=less babies being born.
This is the more optimistic route. Hopefully this will happen, but there are many things, like nukes that could go off, and if the opposite of what you said happens, well, just go watch Idiocracy.

(It's what plants want)
I doubt that any smart nation will use nukes again. In war, no matter what the motivation is, both sides want to gain ground to use.

Nukes are counter-productive. While they may eliminate the enemy, they'll cover the territory with radiation and fallout, making the ground hazardous to troops.

Bio-weaponry would be better for a faction to use because, unlike nukes, you can immunize yourself to not die from it. Fallout shelters can't be made for bio-weaponry, either...
 
Jan 29, 2009
3,328
0
0
about 40 years older, I presume.
NASA will still get a pitifully small funding, scientific interest will grind to a halt as fat, lazy people become complacent with their facebooks and iPhones, yet simultaneously demading more for their money.
And then I will rise from the ashes of this world, chem in one hand, calculus in the other, and rule the wastes!
 

Something Amyss

Aswyng and Amyss
Dec 3, 2008
24,759
0
0
theevilsanta said:
Much better than it is now, just like it always has been every 40 years in the future.

edit - Sadly, you're all very, very wrong. People have been predicting very real, very near future doom since the dawn of history. And lots of uneducated and quick-to-scare folks (like all of you) have been all too ready to believe it. Guess what. It never, ever happened. Things just kept getting better.
Like the AIDS epidemic. anti-biotic resistant sicknesses. Population increases and two emergent billion population nations craving the same resources we already have issue with.

I'm not going to scream certain doom, but the idea that things have never been better is kind of amusing. The idea that past beliefs of the end of the world offer much in the way of perspective is also amusing.

After all, it's more or less like saying that you've driven home drunk lots of times and you've never died.
 

velcrokidneyz

New member
Sep 28, 2010
442
0
0
i would like to be optimistic, but its difficult to be. prolly overpopulation and more suffereing. i dont rly wanna be around for it
 

The Cheezy One

Christian. Take that from me.
Dec 13, 2008
1,912
0
0
The Ambrosian said:
Singularity is great except for those damned phase-ticks.
And I played the Dark Void demo and couldn't stand it. I thought it played pretty bad. That might be just me though.
I wasnt a fan either until I pulled off a couple cool moves. The dog fighting took too long though, and gets old really fast in larger fights, and enemies soak too many shots.
Just thought I'd get Singularity for £10, but I must have been sniped onto the confirm payment screen, because it came up saying "that product is no longer available". Next one - £18. maybe when I next get paid.
 

Ham_authority95

New member
Dec 8, 2009
3,496
0
0
Singularly Datarific said:
about 40 years older, I presume.
NASA will still get a pitifully small funding, scientific interest will grind to a halt.
I doubt that scientific interest will fall flat. You see, science makes businessmen some serious cash.

Every electronic in your house had a research team behind it making sure that it was made correctly. And they got paid big bucks for it, too.

So, if anything, scientific interest will increase because of the growing need for technological innovation to compete in the marketplace. Public funded space and science programs like NASA might be doomed, but science as a whole will get more privatized.
 

dark-amon

New member
Aug 22, 2009
606
0
0
far less people considering China is about to hit the worst tipping of genderbalance in the history of man and the enviromental changes in Africa will kill countless people. I also suspect a almost racist segregation politic will occur if a new big terroristattack happens. Some countries might even start deportation.
On the bright side: when the north pole has melted away and caused irreversabel damage to the Gulf (that's not the bright side) we can start sending all who denies global warming back to the schoolbensh and declare that everyone who denied or denies it for personal comfort are retards.
 

Dan E

New member
Jun 16, 2010
114
0
0
Two ways. The first way is...It ain't there. Other way is very technologically advanced and a unified global government.