How do you imagine the world by 2050?

Recommended Videos

Simonccx

New member
Apr 15, 2009
102
0
0
Why do so many people feel its gonna be a US/china divide? too much fallout methinks. In the next 50 years the EU will probably have emerged as a more solidified super power, it already is the largest economy. That and we will see the rise of many state based coalitions. Welcome to the brand new bloc system excpet this time its worldwide. We will see the rise of african nations and i hate to say but possibly some nations like the us and china may buckle and divide in the new world pressures.

Also people if global warming got too bad it would trigger an ice age which would mean that africa, south america etc would become the new centre of the world.
 

spartan231490

New member
Jan 14, 2010
5,186
0
0
Saucycardog said:
I played the hyrdophobia trial demo today just to see if I liked the game. For those of who don't know, the game is set in 2051 and the planet is suffering from over population and low resources. It got me thinking, what will the world be like by 2050? Will it be that bad?

What do you think?
It will be worse, much worse. I think competition for finite recourses will drive us to war long before 2051, just hope it doesn't go nuke.
 

Spadge

New member
Nov 3, 2009
50
0
0
Wow, there's a whole lot of "We're all going to kill each other" style comments...


I think we've seen the last of major power going toe-to-toe with each other. Where wars are fought between these powers in the future, I expect it to be proxy wars, Vietnam style. A major source of violence in the near future will be terrorism - a lot of terrorist attacks are "foiled" every week (foiled also refers to all the attacks that fail because they're stupid). Statistically speaking, a large terrorist attack is bound to succeed. Much larger than 9/11, possibly a nuke or biological attack. If there's war in the Middle East, this will be how it starts.

The world over, the gap between rich and poor will increase. Central Africa will remain this shithole it is today, minus a couple of diseases, plus a couple of different health problems. Massive advantages in technology will improve everyone's quality of life, but the rich's more than the poor's.

Overpopulation conflicts with the desire for higher birth rates - we're seeing the problem with that now. The Baby Boomers' generation starting to retire and countries across the developed world needing to increase the pension age (to decrease the number of pensioners) and increase tax rates (to pay the increased number of pensioners). The French love to protest, but we'll see those protests around the world soon, because people do not like to be told "Hey, you're going to have to work for an extra 5 years, AND pay more tax while you're doing it". Governments have to make the hard decsions to make sure the people are supported, but that will be crippled by:

Supercorporations. By 2050, and I'm fairly certain of this, borders will be of less importance than employment. Huge diversified corporations will control large parts of many industries to the point where they will run entire areas. We've seen it on the small scale for decades, where a mining company will effectively run a town. The American political scene is run by big business - politicians (and therefore administrations) always owe corportations and I don't think it's a huge step to see Corporatocracies form. These administrations will be beholden to shareholders, and will operated a socially far-right policy where everything is balanced against the bottom line. Czerka, anyone?

History has shown us the average person's work/life ratio has continued to improve throughout history, and there's not much to suggest that won't continue. Automated systems will continue to improve and replace human workers. Where it was commonplace for people to work 50 hour weeks fifty years ago, now it's considered a lot of work which is (mostly) done by cash-strapped people. Now, people demand overtime when they work more than 40 hours, and in fifty years time, I'd expect the average working week to be more like 25 hours. As I mentioned before, the rich/poor divide will worsen so this applies more to the upper-middle class of professionals. The poor will still be working 50 hours weeks, where they can find work. Poverty will be the primary social concern of 2060.

And, because this is The Escapist: We've figured out how to project an image onto 3d refractive material to generate a 3d image. We have systems that can map an entire room in 3d. We have operate by thought technology in prototype fighter jets, and in use in assisting the physically disabled. We have everything needed that full immersive VR is possibly a decade away, maybe 15. Take this further, and we should be able to flawlessly simulate touch/taste/smell and suddenly something like the Enterprise's holodeck doesn't seem too far away.

Ha, almost forgot resource depletion. I've written everything here assuming we solve that problem. At the moment, PV cells are really inefficient (like, 6-10%) - we'll fix that, for sure. Nuclear (fission) in the short term (the next 30-40) years is part of the soultion, moving into more efficiant and cleaner nuclear fusion after that. Organic plastics will be developed in a move away from petrochemicals. Copper is a concern, and we'll see a more public effort to recycle it soon. The worst the planet will see will be in 35-40 years, I think, and then we'll be able to start to fix the damage.
 

theevilsanta

New member
Jun 18, 2010
424
0
0
Zachary Amaranth said:
theevilsanta said:
Much better than it is now, just like it always has been every 40 years in the future.

edit - Sadly, you're all very, very wrong. People have been predicting very real, very near future doom since the dawn of history. And lots of uneducated and quick-to-scare folks (like all of you) have been all too ready to believe it. Guess what. It never, ever happened. Things just kept getting better.
Like the AIDS epidemic. anti-biotic resistant sicknesses. Population increases and two emergent billion population nations craving the same resources we already have issue with.

I'm not going to scream certain doom, but the idea that things have never been better is kind of amusing. The idea that past beliefs of the end of the world offer much in the way of perspective is also amusing.

After all, it's more or less like saying that you've driven home drunk lots of times and you've never died.
No, it's not. And you're wrong. Things never have been better. It sounds weird, but it's absolutely true. Not going to get into details.
 

David_G

New member
Aug 25, 2009
1,133
0
0
Newspeak will be fully integrated into the language. (Sorry, I just read through 1984 and I can't think of anything else at the moment)
 

Shoggoth2588

New member
Aug 31, 2009
10,250
0
0
I don't know but I tell you...if I don't have my own protectron and, a case of Nuka-Cola by then I will be pretty miffed.

---

In the next 40 years I'm hoping robotic teams will have been sent onto the moon and into space where they will be building our first off-world colonies. I'm going to also go out on a limb and assume advanced stem-cell research will have lead to a cure for many more of our diseases like the Rhino Virus (common cold) and more common variants of the flu. Also, you know those prototype 'artificial eyes' you may have heard of a few years back? I am hoping those will be perfected. Blindness may be cured but in 40 years, it may still be limited to the same level of sight as say, dogs who can't see in color and who can't see TV screens.
 

LightningBanks

New member
Apr 15, 2009
790
0
0
The problem is, there are way more people that are keen to destory/not care abouyt the planet then there are that want to save it. People are having kids at teenage years for almost no reason other than they wanted the sex, and people are keen to fight religious wears and etc etc. I mean, remember that thread on korea threatening america with nuclear war?

Anyway, I guess I kinda believe the story of frontlines: Fuel of war (In case you dont know it, resources run out, countries are in pretty much ruin, people are fighting for the last oil spots, Russia team up with China to fight america, all for little amounts of oil for their respective countries. Its generally reffered to as World war 3)

The story of Frontlines takes place around 2012-2015. While I dont think it'll happen then, something like this could happen in the future.
 

fulano

New member
Oct 14, 2007
1,685
0
0
Who knows. At the very least I hope my mind is safely tucked inside some kind of machine where I can watch porn films looping forever in a perpetually young, horny body while I await for somebody to develop transversible wormholes.

Either that or cursing my kids after shitting all over myself 'cause that damn nurse fed me the wrong kinds of baby food...
 

wulfy42

New member
Jan 29, 2009
771
0
0
It's only been in very recent history that the human race has had the ability to destroy all life on this planet. Before that all predictions of the end of the world were speculation on natural disasters, meteor hits or gods wrath.

Right now, this minute, someone out there could make a decision and destroy all life on this planet. Not just one person mind you, many people have that ability.

The truth is the end of the world is almost unavoidable at this point. Why?

Because even if some countries figure out a new source of power etc the world is not at peace and new technology will not be shared with everyone. It isn't being shared with everyone right now. Even if it was share there will be power struggles and eventually one of them will get out of hand.

The quote about war never ending? Thats pretty much true. The human race doesn't know how to work together. There are too many different cultures and governments on this planet with different ideas of what is right, different religions and with grudges against each other.

All it takes is one of them to release a biological agent on the planet that kills a ton of people and the result will be complete anarchy and massive war. The war will eventually involve nukes and when everything is said and done the planet will be irrevocably damaged.

Will global warming and the ozone layers depletion destroy the planet? Not by itself, not even close. In theory global warming could eventually make this planet unable to support life. The reason is that we added something outside the normal equation through the release of gasses over the last few centuries. This might upset the normal balance of ice ages etc and cause a constant cloud layer in our atmosphere. That in turn would trap heat and increase the temperature even more eventually leading to a planet that is too hot to support life.

I don't think that is what is going to happen though and it certainly will not happen in the next 40 years.

If we make it to 2050 I will be absolutely shocked. I predict massive wars will start within the next 20 to 30 years. Once the wars start it won't be long before the end because at this point we have weapons that are too destructive. The end is no longer something we need to guess about or blame on an angry deity. We hold the means for the end in our own hands and only our own self restraint is keeping us from using them.

Looking back at recorded history humanity has not been known for it's restraint at using weapons. I doubt that is going to change even with the much more serious consequences.
 

SimuLord

Whom Gods Annoy
Aug 20, 2008
10,077
0
0
Mankind always muddles through---if anything, that was the core message of Fallout 3 (and the Fallout series in general). Even in the face of complete catastrophe humanity always finds a way.

Besides, I'm old enough to remember when people in the late Eighties were talking about the YEAR TWO THOUSAND and how it'd be a futuristic dreamscape (or cyberpunk nightmare where apparently the sun never shines). 2010's here and except for improvements in communication making it possible for me to have friends literally around the world, from Canada to Argentina and London to Melbourne and all points in between, it sure seems an awful lot like the world in 1985 when I was eight and thought Back to the Future was the coolest thing in the history of anything ever.

I'll turn 73 that year if I live to see 2050. I expect I'll view it remarkably like my grandmother (celebrating her 80th birthday next Sunday) sees 2010---as a "wow, so much new stuff, but people are still people and life is still life" state of affairs. There will be politics and war and essential human goodness and unspeakable human cruelty (to use my grandmother as an example, she was 15 when we nuked Japan and the atrocities of the Holocaust first came to light) go on. War? War never changes.

So I don't think it'll be that different from 2010, or 1910, or AD 10. Maybe on the surface it'll look revolutionary, maybe the major players will be different, but I have the utmost faith from 33 years of experience since my birth in 1977 that age brings perspective.
 
Jan 29, 2009
3,328
0
0
Ham_authority95 said:
Singularly Datarific said:
about 40 years older, I presume.
NASA will still get a pitifully small funding, scientific interest will grind to a halt.
I doubt that scientific interest will fall flat. You see, science makes businessmen some serious cash.

Every electronic in your house had a research team behind it making sure that it was made correctly. And they got paid big bucks for it, too.

So, if anything, scientific interest will increase because of the growing need for technological innovation to compete in the marketplace. Public funded space and science programs like NASA might be doomed, but science as a whole will get more privatized.
Well, consumer goods will, and have been, driving a serious force of scientific advances, although I suspect sciences that are purely for research (Particle Accellerators; anything that you cannot benefit yourself in any immediate way) will be shunned into nonexistence.
As it is, hardly anyone seriously cares about scientific discovery, regardless of money, and I do not expect that to get better.
 

Ham_authority95

New member
Dec 8, 2009
3,496
0
0
Singularly Datarific said:
Ham_authority95 said:
Singularly Datarific said:
about 40 years older, I presume.
NASA will still get a pitifully small funding, scientific interest will grind to a halt.
I doubt that scientific interest will fall flat. You see, science makes businessmen some serious cash.

Every electronic in your house had a research team behind it making sure that it was made correctly. And they got paid big bucks for it, too.

So, if anything, scientific interest will increase because of the growing need for technological innovation to compete in the marketplace. Public funded space and science programs like NASA might be doomed, but science as a whole will get more privatized.
Well, consumer goods will, and have been, driving a serious force of scientific advances, although I suspect sciences that are purely for research (Particle Accellerators; anything that you cannot benefit yourself in any immediate way) will be shunned into nonexistence.
As it is, hardly anyone seriously cares about scientific discovery, regardless of money, and I do not expect that to get better.

Whatever. The future will always be better than the past unless you look at it in a hopeless, pessimistic way like you're doing...
 

TheYellowCellPhone

New member
Sep 26, 2009
8,617
0
0
I can't really imagine it: one point is a lot can happen from point A to point B, and because I bet you a lot of stuff in a time past 2050, someone will unearth this thread and read it, and laugh at out thoughts.

I'm a bit paranoid now. Or was. Or will be.
 

Admiral Stukov

I spill my drink!
Jul 1, 2009
6,943
0
0
I hope for technolgical enhancements of the human body.
Personally I can't wait for the day I get to truthfully utter the words; "My vision is augmented."
 

blankedboy

New member
Feb 7, 2009
5,234
0
0
Tinneh said:
PoisonUnagi said:
What we need is some very real, very sad genocide. Or infertility. If we can half or third the world's population over the course of a couple years, then we should be good. And use the Chinese child policy - no more than 2 children per family, with the obvious exception of triplets.

If that doesn't ensue, then, well, there go our resources.
Just nuke the African continent, nobody likes those guys anyway. Hell, as long as North America, Europe, and Australia are still around I'd be happy.
I said genocide, not racism.
 

Kortney

New member
Nov 2, 2009
1,960
0
0
Pretty much the same as it is now. Little things and technology will have become more convenient, androgyny will be huge but apart from that it will be pretty much the same.

Tinneh said:
Just nuke the African continent, nobody likes those guys anyway. Hell, as long as North America, Europe, and Australia are still around I'd be happy.
And let's hope this guy is gone by then.
 

wagglelance

New member
Oct 3, 2010
72
0
0
Not trying to troll but this is the world in 2012 and there after.
http://goodtimeglory.com/category/shorts/
 
Jan 29, 2009
3,328
0
0
Ham_authority95 said:
Singularly Datarific said:
Ham_authority95 said:
Singularly Datarific said:
about 40 years older, I presume.
NASA will still get a pitifully small funding, scientific interest will grind to a halt.
I doubt that scientific interest will fall flat. You see, science makes businessmen some serious cash.

Every electronic in your house had a research team behind it making sure that it was made correctly. And they got paid big bucks for it, too.

So, if anything, scientific interest will increase because of the growing need for technological innovation to compete in the marketplace. Public funded space and science programs like NASA might be doomed, but science as a whole will get more privatized.
Well, consumer goods will, and have been, driving a serious force of scientific advances, although I suspect sciences that are purely for research (Particle Accellerators; anything that you cannot benefit yourself in any immediate way) will be shunned into nonexistence.
As it is, hardly anyone seriously cares about scientific discovery, regardless of money, and I do not expect that to get better.

Whatever. The future will always be better than the past unless you look at it in a hopeless, pessimistic way like you're doing...
Well, the internet is where I unload my pessimism and imaginatively bleak futures.
To be honest, our generation will hopefully become a decent power in the years to come, whether we like it or not, so it is up to us to make that future awesome.
 

Ham_authority95

New member
Dec 8, 2009
3,496
0
0
Singularly Datarific said:
Well, the internet is where I unload my pessimism and imaginatively bleak futures.
To be honest, our generation will hopefully become a decent power in the years to come, whether we like it or not, so it is up to us to make that future awesome.
That power is ours! *Cheesy fist-pumping*