El Poncho said:
Everyone I know who is religous accepts the views of others so I've never had to reason with any.
However I like to have this quote in my mind most of the time, doubt it would work but I like it
"Is God willing to prevent evil, but not able?
Then he is not omnipotent.
Is he able, but not willing?
Then he is malevolent.
Is he both able, and willing?
Then whence cometh evil?
Is he neither able nor willing?
Then why call him God."
- Epicurus, 33 A.D
That's easy. He is able but not willing. Imagine this: You decide to tell a lie.
"Yeah honey, that looks great," you try to say. Unfortunately, the MIGHTY HAND OF GOD reaches from the sky and knocks you out before the words leave your lips.
thaluikhain said:
You can't bring reason into discussions of religion. Religion, by definition, is something outside or contrary to reason. If there was scientific basis to it, it's science, not religion. If there isn't, or if you choose to ignore it, it's a matter of faith.
Therefore, attempts to appeal to reason can't work, you have to appeal to faith, or nothing at all.
This is absolutely true. However, in this case the argument isn't:
Religion is wrong.
The WBC is religious.
Therfore, the WBC is wrong.
The argument SHOULD be:
The bible says "Don't judge people. Leave it to God."
The WBC judges people and doesn't leave it to God.
Therefore, the WBC is wrong.