How do you think World War III will pan out?

Recommended Videos

MASTACHIEFPWN

Will fight you and lose
Mar 27, 2010
2,279
0
0
A group of nazi's takes over the cripiled world, small sectors of resestance remain across north america and parts of europe... and all of russia is fine.
 

DanTheMan92

New member
Sep 27, 2010
19
0
0
I am Omega said:
Space aliens arrive. We nuke the alliens. Then more aliens arrive.
Rinse-repeat until either
a: the aliens give up
b: we run out of nukes
c: all the fallout from the sky causes the fish to mutate, causing WWIV, MAN VS FISHMAN!
Dude that isn't funny at all, gain a sense of humour.

Anyway, it will start in some shape or form by a powerful country, such as USA to Nuke somewhere (I'm not saying it will be the USA)
 

ImprovizoR

New member
Dec 6, 2009
1,952
0
0
It wont last longer that how long it takes a nuke to reach it's target. Luckily for me my country will be spared. We never participate in anything good or bad. The world likes to ignore us, and I like to ignore the world.
 

Caspertjuhh

New member
Oct 19, 2010
243
0
0
ImprovizoR said:
It wont last longer that how long it takes a nuke to reach it's target. Luckily for me my country will be spared. We never participate in anything good or bad. The world likes to ignore us, and I like to ignore the world.
Switzerland?
 

badgersprite

[--SYSTEM ERROR--]
Sep 22, 2009
3,820
0
0
I don't think we're ever going to wage a war on the scale of WWI or WWII where we send a whole generation to fight. It's simply outdated. Most wars will probably be fought on a smaller scale by professional armies, and major superpowers will most likely not engage each other with huge standing armies, but fight in smaller proxy wars, as has been going on since the end of WWII and the start of The Cold War.

If there is a WWIII it won't be anytime soon. It simply isn't viable with the world in its current state. Major powers aren't going to gut themselves by exposing themselves to such a huge conflict. Hate to break it to you, but having your country blown up isn't good for your economy.
 

manaman

New member
Sep 2, 2007
3,218
0
0
LustFull0ne said:
A literal world war................Earth vs Mars........
We would own that little red planet, send it crying back to it's mommy.

I say we just throw the moon at it, kill two birds with one stone.
 

manaman

New member
Sep 2, 2007
3,218
0
0
BlackMunz said:
shaneriding said:
penicillin, the jet engine, the internet, computers, telephone, electricity, flight, combustion engine, the TB vaccine. Im sure these were all ideas stolen by the oppressive white man. Nearly half the places were used to dump convicts? I'm guessing you mean Australia and then thought that one in god knows how many must mean half? Also i don't think these people INVENTED clean water and education.

These backwater countries have been destroying themselves for thousands of years, long before the crusades etc. If i am correct it was those who came here first,pillaging and destroying before the crusaders drove them back.

Which Commonwealth countries arent doing well? I cant remember the last time a suicide bomber or car bomb blew up in Ontario, Wellington, Sydney, Mumbai, Los Angeles. It seems to me that they live in their "constitutional monarchies" (and which are still democratic, and for all intents and purposes the Queen has no power over them) quite peacefully with their neighbours. Look at Egypt, one of the largest stable democracies in Africa which was a former British colony. South Africa now has peace (don't mention the Boers - that isnt a result of the British, it was Dutch settlers).

These other countries have been destroying themselves for millenia, not just a few hundred years as you put it. Tribes from Africa would come up into Europe and enslave entire villages before taking them back to their own hell holes throughout the Greek and Roman Empires.

Whilst the British Empire wasnt always good, it brought infrastructure, hospitals, roads, schools etc to many parts of the world. It fought back against the Nazis, Napoleon, Bismarks armies. It abolished the slave trade and introduced many parts of the world to the french idea of democracy. Instead of looking at those who died, look if you can at those who have lived because of it. Those who have had chance to go to school etc.

Whilst I can see that we aren't very likely to see eye to eye please don't piss in my bucket and tell me its raining when you say these countries would be better without us. They need countries like GB, France and USA because without someone steering them in the Humane direction they will continue to oppress and fight amongst themselves like they have for as long as they have existed. They are backwards countries who feel that murder is OK, women are a mans possession and that by blaming everything on everyone else they will get by. Sorry Once people like yourself wake up, stop apologising for everything and realise it isn't all flowers and peaceful singing around a fire, the world will move forward.
First of all the British Empire was neither as glorious and righteous nor as evil as either one of you described it. I mean the BE was pretty hard on any form of riot but they did lay the foundations for world trade.
But more importantly the BE never fought back against Bismarks armies because Bismark never did anything to shift the balance of power in Europe to Britain disatvantage. He fougth three wars: One against Denmark which tried to usurp parts of northern Germany(at this point "Britain was humiliated and left impotent, as it was unwilling to commit ground troops to Denmark and failed to receive support from France" - Harold Temperley), one against Austria over the same region and finally the German unification war against France which was over so quickly that Britian didn't had a chance to react (and we won that one too). After that Bismark tried to construct an order of treaties in Europe to make war amongst the great nations impossible (except with France because at that time Germany and France hated the shit out of each other) and was renown as a mediator in European diplomatic affairs.

OT: I think that if WW3 is going to happen it is because of the nearly inevitable economic downfall of the US. Their debt problem is second only to Japans (Greece earlier this year was in a better position debt wise). The EU is a bigger market and grows at a much higher rate, as does Chinas. Because of that and the already great social tensions in the US some president will start a war to distract from the inner problems which goes horribly wrong thus starting World War 3. I would guess that Europe would emerge victorious due to the fact that we have far less nukes and nearly no first strike capabilities which would make us a lesser priority target for nuclear first strikes and our high level of technology. When the other countrys are done nuking the shit out of each other our survining military forces would be able to win in no time.
The US is still a larger market then the EU. The US is only challenged by China, but per capita the US is in a much, much stronger position. Then again it all depends on how you want to look at it. The EU has more people if you want to be as simple as that, but they have less purchasing power per person. Then again even in Canada where they have quite a bit less income then a person in the US doing the same job managed to run a spin program to keep people from taking jobs in the US that tried (mostly failed) to tell Canadians that the larger income results in less disposable income. If they can spin that, then I guess you can spin anything.
 

Socius

New member
Dec 26, 2008
1,114
0
0
iLikeHippos said:
Now that's just being cynical. And quite fair, paranoid...

No, if we focus on education amongst all, there'll be very little wars. Why do you think there are talibans to begin with?
because americans blow up their houses and they want vengance. But thats just now.
the old Taliban was formed when the Sovjets did the same thing the americans are doing now.
at wich point the Americans was supporting them, oh world, how random you are.

I do realise that isn't all thats too it, but if you simplify it somewhat thats whats behind it.
 

Caspertjuhh

New member
Oct 19, 2010
243
0
0
I dont think there will be any more nuke wars. Any war now with 2 great powers would probably be like the cold war
 

Cypher10110

New member
Jul 16, 2009
165
0
0
LustFull0ne said:
A literal world war................Earth vs Mars........
"...We had been fighting for so long no-one could remember the reason why it all started in the first place. All we knew was that there were two sides, The Coalition, and The Alliance. For decades millions died for the same piece of rock again and again. Finally, one side managed to gain the upper hand, The Coalition. In desperation The Alliance launched 5 sleeper ships..."
 

ImprovizoR

New member
Dec 6, 2009
1,952
0
0
caspertjuhh said:
ImprovizoR said:
It wont last longer that how long it takes a nuke to reach it's target. Luckily for me my country will be spared. We never participate in anything good or bad. The world likes to ignore us, and I like to ignore the world.
Switzerland?
Nah, Switzerland doesn't stand a chance. Montenegro.
 

Last Valiance

New member
Jun 26, 2010
174
0
0
Iran and Israel, two of the most ruthless nuclear capable countries in the world, will start a shit storm -- they'll invade the countries around them unti they border each other and then form a miniature cold war. These two countries become the centres of power in the middle east, controlling essentially all of the remaining oil in the world.

Most would say "well, the yanks back the Israelis so they would win with superior technology", but lets say an up-and-coming economy like China needs more and more oil but can't meet demands. They can't make an agreement with Russia and the USA has their claws in Israel, so they turn to Iran.

Pretty soon things heat up massively as the nut-jobs who run them begin stockpiling and making outrageous claims on oil in areas that their opposite number has already occupied. The UN will try to reach some sort of peaceful solution, but with the US and China gone it loses much of it's power.

The UK will finally be forced to choose whether to support the US or the EU after toe dipping n both for the past five decades. India will most likely back America and Britain, odd as it sounds, because of their awkward relations with rival power China and their love of western culture that dates back a century.
The EU will actually be the most potentially destructive superpower on the planet, with the combined nuclear threat of three of the world's biggest economies plus many more minor ones as well as some of the largest standing armies going under it's wing, however because of the mistrust that even still the EU treats it's allies with they won't make a move.
Some shit will start in the balkans between the EU and the Russians over the pipelines that run through them and the small oil reserves there, heightening tensions further.


All over the world countries will become more and more tenacious in the search for oil, and the Russians will once again become a very closed state, re-building their armed forces and allying with China over the west, backing Pakistan as a threat to India and engulfing the surrounding countries such as Kazakhstan and some parts of the odl eastern bloc, who will welcome the kremlin back. Russia will quite possibly have another communist revolution, though this time their regime will be much less harsh and have more trade with other countries, though this will still reduce massively.
Japan and S. Korea will back the Americans whilst N. Korea will strongly back China

Israel and Iran will nuke the hell out of each other. Something else will set off N. Korea, who will attempt a pre-emptive strike against S. Korea and Japan. Russia will invade the balkans and fight with EU forces there, but neither will fire nukes yet.
In South America they'll have their own little shit storm going on between Brazil and Argentina, who have grown into rival economic powers.
China and America will try one last time not to laucnh their nukes, but some sort of lapse, possibly an accidentally sunk ship, will completely destroy communications, and suddenly it will be a race to see who can fire their nukes first: The US and China will destroy each other utterly, with Canada and the countries of south east asia getting caught in the crossfire.
The Russians will finally fire a nuke into India, on their new found border with which tensions have been steadily mounting for years. India will launch it's load at Russia, however their fairly weak nuclear programme will not be able to stop the kremlin, and then beg for help from the EU, who will oblige, bombing several major east russian cities.

So kind of in short:
China and the USA have blown each other to shit
Russia and India have blown each other to shit
the EU's diplomacy lies in ruins and tensions within it are high. Will possibly destroy itself in the coming months.
S. Korea, Japan, N. Korea, Israel and Iran are no more.
Most of the middle east has been devastated by fallout but has also been tearing itself apart before this.
South America will get into it's own little world war.
Africa has had old school wars and invasions with some of the worst atrocities occuring, but their lack of a nuclear deterrant has turn the world's eyes away from them.
The Balkans are dust, so is much of eastern Europe such as Belarus and Poland.
The EU three (UK, France+Germany) just survive, though their farms are utterly ruined by fallout from Russia. Southern Europe (southern parts of Italy and Spain) will escaoe unscathed.
Australia will have become a missile base for the US, like Britain did in the 70's, and as such will have been blown to hell by the Chinese.


Your best bet is southern central america, most likely. That or space.
 

Last Valiance

New member
Jun 26, 2010
174
0
0
PS.
There are more than two "superpowers" in the world right now:

China and America we know, but the EU has the largest economy going and India is set to overtake China because of it's better foreign policies on trade.

By WW3 I'm not even sure the US will still be a superpower tbh: Later this coming strikes and riots will tear it apart as the banking system totally crumbles and the economy grinds to a halt. Same thing will happen in much of Europe.
 

Macgyvercas

Spice & Wolf Restored!
Feb 19, 2009
6,103
0
0
SimuLord said:
"I know not with what weapons World War III will be fought, but World War IV will be fought with sticks and stones." - Albert Einstein
Ninja'd.

But yeah, World War III is probably going to involve resetting society in some way.