Well, that's the point, that I can't answer in yes/no terms. Sex can be important or unimportant depending on the realtionship and circumstances. A couple can have a great realtionship without sex making it unimportant for them. Others might need it to justify why they're even together. I don't think it's as easy as "sex is important: agree/disagree".
Also...quantum physics equation...if anything I would think it might open a philosophical discussion (not that it was my intention) but this has nothing to do with physics.[/quote]
Ok you got me there, and your right. It is more of a question of philosophy than physics.
dogenzakaminion said:
D64nz said:
dogenzakaminion said:
Well, sex can be different things at different times. I won't really talk about my own relationship, but sex can be all the way from loving and beautiful to violent and destructive.
Then answer the question in yes/no terms, based on if you had the oppurtunity with a suitable female (or male if thats your game). There is no need to make this into a quantum physics equation.
Simple answer is?
Well, that's the point, that I can't answer in yes/no terms. Sex can be important or unimportant depending on the realtionship and circumstances. A couple can have a great realtionship without sex making it unimportant for them. Others might need it to justify why they're even together. I don't think it's as easy as "sex is important: agree/disagree".
Also...quantum physics equation...if anything I would think it might open a philosophical discussion (not that it was my intention) but this has nothing to do with physics.
Ok first off yes you have me there. You're right in that it is more a point of philosophy than physics generally.
The only point I will argue is that which you bring up of "is sex important".
I know it's not the main thrust of your reply but i want to focus on this aspect as I think it is central to the founding idea of this thread - How important is sex to you.
Why sex is important: it makes new people.
Is it important to indivdual people? Not always.
In history we have cases of people in power with a supply of hundreds if not thousands of concubines, and I'm talking on the procreative level here, we can see how on the genetic level that works. If oddly accepted at that time.
The human being is a form wishing to procreate itself, and we all can understand that. The more so (we procreate) the better for our genetic heretage.
With that in mind, what does it say about those that think sex, and by implication propergating their own genes, is unimportant? I draw attention to the Darwin awards. Those that took themselves out of the gene pool before they could procreate.