Of all the post I took time to write up you focused on that. . . Yea, I think that actually prooves the point I was trying to make. Again, focus on the fact that right now she is more like a cancer to soceity and her habbit is infact hurting other people than those close to her. She is indirectly hurting the rest of the people on Goverment fund.SillyBear said:Maybe, but I would wager spelling ignorant ignorent is even more ignorent. Wait..EradiusLore said:bit of an ignorent thing to saySillyBear said:Gaming really is dangerous. I can't think of any other entertainment based hobby that chews so much time and can completely destroy a person. I don't know any bookworms or film buffs that are as pathetic as these people.
Be safe people! Game in moderation.
I never claimed it was. I was talking to someone explicitly about World of Warcraft. Hence why I focused on that.Nikolaz72 said:I think the point theres being made is that you are just as close-minded as anybody else you can think of. World of Warcraft is not the only game onlineSillyBear said:You're partaking in your social relationships through a barrier of security. These friends of yours online aren't really connected to you other than through voice and by game. You have never seen them outside of the game, you have not seen how they interact with the world and you are interacting them with the equivalent of a brick wall between you.Daniel Janhagen said:If you seriously think that (and it seems you do), I don't know how to change your opinion. I have friends that I didn't meet in WoW, and I have friends I did meet there. They're the same quality friends, but the WoW ones are three times as many (not counting my family and relatives, obviously). I do not regret a single hour spent in that game. (Five years worth).
Of course you don't agree with me, you're too entrenched to do so. And that's fine! I realise that people can make friends online, but to suggest that being friends in WoW and being friends in real life is equal is ridiculous.
Real life>Fantasy. Of course there is a place for both and of course you can be enriched by both, but one is significantly more important and holds more gravitas than the other.
Even trying to suggest to me that talking through a laggy voice communication system and cartoon characters is as equal as real life conversation is being completely ignorant to biology. Face to face conversation and non-verbal cues count for a fuck load.
Because that was the only part of your post that I didn't agree with.Nikolaz72 said:Of all the post I took time to write up you focused on that
No, I really don't think it does. You called me close minded for suggesting that excessive and anti-social use of the internet and video games is dangerous. The rest of the stuff you said is either:Nikolaz72 said:. . . Yea, I think that actually prooves the point I was trying to make.
i have to agree with you, but i think she should probably get a job, i'm not a fan of people living of other peoples taxes etc.Aeonknight said:If it makes her happy, who are you to judge?
instead of complaining, why not try and get the thread back on track by posting you opinion?Corekrash said:Such a shame when a thread gets derailed into a game of back and forth...
No, you said that even Social use of the internet was Anti-social. Which I claimed was wrong.SillyBear said:Because that was the only part of your post that I didn't agree with.Nikolaz72 said:Of all the post I took time to write up you focused on that
No, I really don't think it does. You called me close minded for suggesting that excessive and anti-social use of the internet and video games is dangerous. The rest of the stuff you said is either:Nikolaz72 said:. . . Yea, I think that actually prooves the point I was trying to make.
A: Things I agree with
or
B: Things I never meant to imply.
So yeah, no point replying to those parts.
No I didn't buddddyyyyy. If I thought that, why the fuck would I even be talking to you right now?Nikolaz72 said:No, you said that even Social use of the internet was Anti-social. Which I claimed was wrong.SillyBear said:Because that was the only part of your post that I didn't agree with.Nikolaz72 said:Of all the post I took time to write up you focused on that
No, I really don't think it does. You called me close minded for suggesting that excessive and anti-social use of the internet and video games is dangerous. The rest of the stuff you said is either:Nikolaz72 said:. . . Yea, I think that actually prooves the point I was trying to make.
A: Things I agree with
or
B: Things I never meant to imply.
So yeah, no point replying to those parts.
I'm not complaining and I already posted on topic earlier, so I'd just be repeating myselfMaster Steeds said:instead of complaining, why not try and get the thread back on track by posting you opinion?Corekrash said:Such a shame when a thread gets derailed into a game of back and forth...
Same here buddy, although I don't really attribute how sad I am to gaming so much as my general indolence and misanthropic demeanour. I've had times where I've been addicted to games, but eventually you will get sick of playing the same thing over and over again and you'll find a substitute to break the monotony. Even if it isn't game related, I spend way too much time on the Internet/listening to music on my laptop for example.Annoying Turd said:I know myself.
I'm just a lonely girlfriendless loser. and a bad person :-( help me
You talked about World of Warcraft socialising in a different matter. Facebook and Escapist might be online but you claim World of Warcraft socialising is in fact. Anti-Social because it prevents her from showing up at events you find to be more important.SillyBear said:No I didn't buddddyyyyy. If I thought that, why the fuck would I even be talking to you right now?Nikolaz72 said:No, you said that even Social use of the internet was Anti-social. Which I claimed was wrong.SillyBear said:Because that was the only part of your post that I didn't agree with.Nikolaz72 said:Of all the post I took time to write up you focused on that
No, I really don't think it does. You called me close minded for suggesting that excessive and anti-social use of the internet and video games is dangerous. The rest of the stuff you said is either:Nikolaz72 said:. . . Yea, I think that actually prooves the point I was trying to make.
A: Things I agree with
or
B: Things I never meant to imply.
So yeah, no point replying to those parts.
god damn it, knew i should have spell checked before posting. but rather then focusing on a single spelling mistake you should look at what i was trying to say. and the fact is games are a medium, people are the ones that take it too far. just like guns don't go around killing people, people using guns go around killing people. you cant tell people games are dangerous, because they really aren't. what you should be saying is take a bit of responsibility for your own actions and don't take gaming to far, because your harming yourself and other people around you by being so selfish.SillyBear said:Maybe, but I would wager spelling ignorant ignorent is even more ignorent. Wait..
Wow.poiumty said:Yes, because you are. You came here to take the soap box and preach the evils of gaming to whoever will listen. Disguising it as you being oh-so-concerned does nothing when you follow up with ignorant rhetoric.SillyBear said:I'm seriously concerned about the life of one of my oldest friends, and you call me ignorant and pedantic?
Mate, the reason I didn't reply to the rest of your post was because it was full of stuff like this. Thank you, Captain Obvious. If I really believed games were sign of the devil and that everyone who uses them is anti-social, I wouldn't be a signed up to a gaming website, would I? I'm sorry you misinterpreted me, but the stuff you are posting to me is really really not anything like what I was saying.EradiusLore said:god damn it, knew i should have spell checked before posting. but rather then focusing on a single spelling mistake you should look at what i was trying to say. and the fact is games are a medium, people are the ones that take it too far. just like guns don't go around killing people, people using guns go around killing people. you cant tell people games are dangerous, because they really aren't. what you should be saying is take a bit of responsibility for your own actions and don't take gaming to far, because your harming yourself and other people around you by being so selfish.SillyBear said:Maybe, but I would wager spelling ignorant ignorent is even more ignorent. Wait..
By cutting out every other parts of peoples post you prove that you didnt show interrest in the rest. Its a bit like say, listening in real life to a guy having a speech. Then when he is done you pick at the fact that he used wrong grammar in second sentence from top.SillyBear said:Wow.poiumty said:Yes, because you are. You came here to take the soap box and preach the evils of gaming to whoever will listen. Disguising it as you being oh-so-concerned does nothing when you follow up with ignorant rhetoric.SillyBear said:I'm seriously concerned about the life of one of my oldest friends, and you call me ignorant and pedantic?
You have misinterpreted me more than anyone ever has on this website. Connnngrraaatuullllations!
P.S: I edited my post you seemed to have such a huge problem with. In truth, I just worded it badly because I wrote it in a rush. Please have a read, I cleared some things up.
But if you would rather call me shallow and pedantic and say i have ignorant rhetoric whilst you swirl your invisible glass of red wine, go ahead!
Mate, the reason I didn't reply to the rest of your post was because it was full of stuff like this. Thank you, Captain Obvious. If I really believed games were sign of the devil and that everyone who uses them is anti-social, I wouldn't be a signed up to a gaming website, would I? I'm sorry you misinterpreted me, but the stuff you are posting to me is really really not anything like what I was saying.EradiusLore said:god damn it, knew i should have spell checked before posting. but rather then focusing on a single spelling mistake you should look at what i was trying to say. and the fact is games are a medium, people are the ones that take it too far. just like guns don't go around killing people, people using guns go around killing people. you cant tell people games are dangerous, because they really aren't. what you should be saying is take a bit of responsibility for your own actions and don't take gaming to far, because your harming yourself and other people around you by being so selfish.SillyBear said:Maybe, but I would wager spelling ignorant ignorent is even more ignorent. Wait..