How should the next Elder Scrolls Game be handled?

[KiloFox]

Complicate it back up. Skyrim was dumbed down too much.

I want to create spells.
I want races to have meaning beyond a palette swap.
I want a more interesting level mechanic than vanilla levels/ perk.

As for dragons, they were so poorly implemented that it doesn't matter to me if I never see them again. Sorry, but 100 generic dragon battles is not my idea of fun. If an Ancient dragon is essentially identical in all respects but HP as a Blood Dragon - that is just lazy programming. The mark was sure missed there.

As a storyline, there's enough Daedric lore for the writers to muddle there way into some kind of "lone hero saves the world" story.

this

dragons never really caught my interest. in fact, the main reason i enjoyed Skyrim so much MORE than Oblivion was because of the werewolves. and i'd LOVE to see them take that supernatural-racial-tension further in a future Elder Scrolls game/DLC (hey if Vampires can get a whole "save the world" sub-plot in Skyrim then SO CAN WERES DAMNIT!) i always felt throughout playing Oblivion and Skyrim that that area was never really explored to its fullest potential. if i'm a wussy Vampire i wanna have a full quest thing for it and be able to go out and get blood-cattle and stuff. if i'm a werewolf (and i will be every time) i wanna be able to go on hunts with my "pack". dodge hunters in towns and stuff. they could play around with it and give it a lot of depth and fun. (hell even ADD a Vamp/Were hunter faction so those people who don't wanna be either have something extra to do)

i play a Kahjiit, always have, and unless a more canid species crops up, i always will. but nothing really ever made me FEEL like i was __RACE__ in Skyrim. hardly any responses or comments were made. which was a step back from Oblivion where guards actually NOTICED your race. and the level system was kinda bland. in both the games (i'm only running off of Oblivion and Skyrim knowledge. i never played Morrowind. the later games ruined it for me by spoiling me with better mechanics and graphics)

multiplayer would be cool, but with the Elder Scrolls Online coming out i think it's unnecessary and redundant.
i WOULD however like to see some advancements made in combat. Skyrim did great by adding those Execution animations. but i'd really like to see more added to that. like when you climb onto the Dragons head to kill it, i'd like you to be able to do that on a whim (not necessarily a dragon either. giants too) jump onto and grab/grapple your opponents. throw smaller ones to the ground/into walls or spikes. climb over large enemies like Dragons Dogma or Shadow of the Collosus. basically turn that animation into something you can control. it'd likely be forced 3rd person, but it'd be interesting to see a take on that from a first-person angle as well. (minor gripe about 3rd person, but sneaking around dosn't look quite right in 3rd person. even if it's just aesthetic an ability to take "cover" behind a wall would be nice. (i say "cover" in quotes because you likely won't ever attack from it.))

Bethesda has a great game series going for it. an intricate and interesting world and a near infinite number of directions to take it. their graphics have reached the point where improvement isn't really necessary, just a little touching up to get rid of bugs and clipping and stuff. their mechanics work great (though get rid of the Skyrim/Fallout lockpicking thing. it takes a lot of luck and not real player skill like Oblivions. sure it was annoying but i could pick a Vhard lock at super-low Lockpicking skill with 1 pick because i had good timing. this one... requires a lot of luck and guesswork.) and they have a dedicated fanbase. now that they don't have to worry about making it "look amazing" because they have all the stuff for it already, we should see the series swell with more story and content. more stuff to actually DO rather than prettier things to look at and spill blood on.

also the moving stuff around your house to decorate it has always been a pain in the ass. that really needs some work done on it. like the ability to enter a "mode" or something where the controls are JUST for moving stuff around. (think Halo Forge mode) it's at the point where i just pick up all the food and plats and crap off the desks and put them in a cupboard. it's gonna end up on the floor anyway. then i won't be able to put it back.

sorry about the WALL of text. The Elder Scrolls is one of my favourite games and i usually have a lot to say.

 

[charge52]

1) Yes dragons are very big. The larger and more complex a model is, the harder it is to properly program it to move and detect collision.
2) Dragons can fly. No other enemies (outside of a few in Morrowind) do this, and never fly as fast or as far as the dragons in Skyrim.
3) Dragons not only fly, but find space to land on the ground and attack. Their attacks are also different when they are on the ground and in the sky. Again, no enemies in the Elder Scrolls have ever done this. Most enemies either shoot arrows/spells or attack with melee and occasionally heal themselves or others. The combat is very basic. As I said later in my post, combat is one of the weakest parts of the Elder Scrolls series.

1) Ok... are you saying you're impressed that programmers can do their job again?
2) So because the programmers can make the Dragon fly "faster and farther" it's some technological miracle? Another case of someone doing their basic job, nothing impressive(not to mention how many times dragonflight has bugged out, remember when dragons flew backwards?)
3) Hate to break it to you, but setting locations for Dragons is no more complicated than setting pathfinding for most NPCs. They establish proper code, set out the multiple paths, and input some algorithms that will cause it to choose one landing zone over another.

1) Spoken dialogue has two huge problems associated with it, disk space and money. The more dialogue you have, the more space you need to store it, and more dialogue means more actors or more recording time, or both, which is very, very expensive.
2) Not to mention writing the dialogue and programming the correct lines to be spoken at the right times. Unless you're perfectly fine with huge textboxes (a la Morrowind) spoken dialogue has a long way to go in any game, not just Skyrim.

1) They set out to create radiant AI, make people feel alive, they failed, you can use the excuse that it costs tons of money, but the fact of the matter is, they chose to do it and failed to do it.
2) I would be fine with the huge text boxes, because maybe then Bethesda would be able to create NPCs who feel alive because they could program tons more dialogue with out worrying about all the time and money it costs to voice all of it.

1) I agree with most of this, the pathfinding and combat intelligence of the companions is pretty terrible, but compare that to previous Bethesda games' companions and you'll see that they have many less mistakes than others. Artificial companions are just below sentient AI and are very difficult to do, especially in such a large sprawling world.

1) Just because it's(barely) improved does not excuse all of it's flaws. Again, they set out to make NPCs feel alive, and this is just another way in which they failed.

Also, let me get this straight, you were impressed because the programmers were competent enough to do their fucking job?

Yes I am.
It is so rare that a game as ambitious and large as Skyrim is made to completion with so few major hiccups. There is no such thing as a perfect game, but I think on the whole, they did what they set out to accomplish with an astounding level of execution. I'm not saying there aren't things to fix. I'm simply admiring the work that they have done so far. This thread was supposed to be about what you would like to see in a new Elder Scrolls game, not what you hated from the last one.

Since you say few hiccups, I'm going to assume you don't count the shit ton of bugs as hiccups. They didn't even accomplish half of what they set out to do. Examples, NPC AI that I've mentioned, they set out to make Dragons feel alive, but they still have the same problems everything has, bugs out and is limited to about 20 actions, all of which play out the exact same way. They set out to make every dungeon look unique, but still retained about 5, maybe 6 dungeon tile sets. They set out to make Skyrim feel like a unique and real world, but instead ended up with a stale game world that felt more artificial than their AI. They set out to have dynamically randomly generated quests, which amount to kill bandits in this dungeon for the 20th time.
What should be in the next elder scrolls game? How about more skills, like in previous games, a return to attributes, like in previous games, a return to the class system, like in previous games. I would like them to add spell making back, add back removed spells and add even more, I would like them to add more variety between weapons, and make locations and dungeons more unique, I would like them to add a halfway decent story that isn't incredibly generic. I would like them to stop simplifying the games to pander to a more casual audience, I would like them to use an engine that doesn't force a loading screen as much as it does know, I would like them to try and appeal to the audience that got them where they are today, I would like them to add spears and throwing weapons back. I would like them to add more things than they remove. If you want me to say more just ask, cause I can.

 

[charge52]

Also, let me get this straight, you were impressed because the programmers were competent enough to do their fucking job?

Yes I am.
It is so rare that a game as ambitious and large as Skyrim is made to completion with so few major hiccups. There is no such thing as a perfect game, but I think on the whole, they did what they set out to accomplish with an astounding level of execution. I'm not saying there aren't things to fix. I'm simply admiring the work that they have done so far. This thread was supposed to be about what you would like to see in a new Elder Scrolls game, not what you hated from the last one.

I agree with this. People always post long lists of flaws with Elder Scrolls games and then act surprised when I still like them. I often say "there's nothing else like The Elder Scrolls" hoping someone will prove me wrong. People invariably rebut with a bunch of old 2D top-down titles, Arx Fatalis, 4x space mining sims and STALKER. Like I always say, I will shit all over Bethesda's series when someone else does the same thing and does it half as well.

Gothic 1, Gothic 2, Gothic 3. Risen. I don't know if this was your intention, but your post makes it sound like you only like the Elder Scrolls because it is unique, not because you think it's good.

 

[Rooster Cogburn]

Gothic 1, Gothic 2, Gothic 3. Risen.

This is exactly what I am talking about lol. Great games, I'm sure (except Gothic 3), but they just don't scratch the same itch. The only good answer I've ever gotten is STALKER, but that's not even an RPG.

I don't know if this was your intention, but your post makes it sound like you only like the Elder Scrolls because it is unique, not because you think it's good.

I don't like it because it is unique, I just like it. I'm willing to forgive a lot because it is to my liking and because it is unique. If there was a game called Schmeyrim that was basically the same concept but it fixed all the complaints people have, I would play that instead. But there isn't.

 

[michaelarby]

As long as they dont dumb it down any more. I was gutted when they got rid of the acrobatics skill for example- sure it didnt do much for the game in the grand scheme of things, but being able to jump over a cliff or fortress wall opened up more stealth approaches, and made general traversing easier. Not to mention it was just bloody good fun.

At the rate theyve been going, looking back to morrowind and oblivion, TES6 will just have a weapon, stealth and magic skills and we'll basically be playing Fable!

 

[RandV80]

what would i like to see? either licence a decent engine or start from the ground up as the current engine is a nightmare. secondly either drop all the pretence and either make it xbox exclusive or actually spend the time to port things and optomise them properly on each system.

one thing bethesda seems to of forgotten is that its not the console crowd that keeps their games being played 10 years after release its the pc crowd and modders. most console players will get their game play it and never touch it again within a couple of months

Xbox exclusive? More like PC exclusive!

Anyways, I've said it before but it's about time they went bigger. For two console generations now the game has been set in a single province roughly 16 square KM's in size. How about for TES VI they give us two provinces to play in, each one being the same size as the previous games, and the story revolving around a conflict/war between the two. In this manner you would have different starting points in the game, pick one of the local races the game is centered on and you start there, pick an Imperial and you start in the Imperial Legion attempting to keep the peace, and the rest of the races can be dumped into a more flexible mercenary category. Looking at the world map something between Summerset-Valenwood-Elsweyr or High Rock-Hammerfell would work.

 

[SajuukKhar]

The next Elder Scrolls game could be set in Hammerfell, and involve a main hero who discovers they have sword-singing powers.

For those of you who don't know Sword-Singing is basically the Redguard equivalent to the Thu'um, its a form of voice/spirit magic that's so powerful it allows people to split atoms.

Sword-sining was practiced by the ancient Redguards but mostly lost when a band of sword-singners used the forbidden atom splitting technique to destroy the Redguard homeland of Yokuda.

Sword-singing can be passed on via stone cubes, similarly to how the Thu'um can be learned via word walls.

It would allow Bethesda to make another games with the Thu'um, without having to actually use the thu'um again.

 

[charge52]

Gothic 1, Gothic 2, Gothic 3. Risen.

This is exactly what I am talking about lol. Great games, I'm sure (except Gothic 3), but they just don't scratch the same itch. The only good answer I've ever gotten is STALKER, but that's not even an RPG.

I don't know if this was your intention, but your post makes it sound like you only like the Elder Scrolls because it is unique, not because you think it's good.

I don't like it because it is unique, I just like it. I'm willing to forgive a lot because it is to my liking and because it is unique. If there was a game called Schmeyrim that was identical but it fixed all the complaints people have, I would play that instead. But there isn't.

1. Out of curiosity, did you play Gothic 3, or did you more hear about how it was bad, because I remember when it was released it was bashed because it had a buggy launch and because it was easier than the original Gothic.
2. The thing with the games, they really have the same design as the Elder Scrolls games, with the only difference being that the story is more important(WAY less though in Gothic 3, which is another reason some Gothic fans didn't like it) The only reason they wouldn't itch the same scratch would mainly be because of the person playing would approach it seeing the heavier emphasis on story, and thinking that you're supposed to due main quests over side quests. Though the main ones that applies to is Gothic 2&3, because Risen has heavy emphasis on Story, and Gothic 1, oh man it's hard to say that game is good anymore, it has not aged all that well. Good game for a laptop though, keyboard only controls.

 

[Simonoly]

I'd like to see a return of atributes, but I would want the perks system to remain. My main issue with Oblivion was the fact that you could become the best at everything just by maxing all skills to 100. With Skyrim you can max all skills but perks are limited, so you can't actually become the best at everything. Perks should stay, but attributes should return. Maybe give them a 1-10 scale like Fallout.

I'd like to see an Elder Scrolls game where you're not the 'destined one'. Maybe you can choose your origin in a similar way to Dragon Age. I'd much prefer that.

 

[Rooster Cogburn]

1. Out of curiosity, did you play Gothic 3, or did you more hear about how it was bad, because I remember when it was released it was bashed because it had a buggy launch and because it was easier than the original Gothic.
2. The thing with the games, they really have the same design as the Elder Scrolls games, with the only difference being that the story is more important(WAY less though in Gothic 3, which is another reason some Gothic fans didn't like it) The only reason they wouldn't itch the same scratch would mainly be because of the person playing would approach it seeing the heavier emphasis on story, and thinking that you're supposed to due main quests over side quests. Though the main ones that applies to is Gothic 2&3, because Risen has heavy emphasis on Story, and Gothic 1, oh man it's hard to say that game is good anymore, it has not aged all that well. Good game for a laptop though, keyboard only controls.

I just heard Gothic 3 was bad. I read a lot about it and decided I wouldn't like it. It wasn't just the bugs that put me off. Maybe I will reconsider, but I don't know when I would get to it with all the other games I want to play!

They don't have the same design as The Elder Scrolls. The worlds are designed and presented differently and the class and levelling systems emphasize a different kind of experience. Maybe if you take one of the differences in isolation, it might not seem that distinct. But taken as a whole, the exploration and freeform development of the Elder Scrolls is a different experience from those other games. That's part of the reason why the story is presented differently in the Elder Scrolls.

It makes sense to me that someone who doesn't see a distinction between what Skyrim and Gothic are trying to do wouldn't think much of the former. Please do not take that as a criticism. I'm just saying "If you feel like 'x' I suppose 'y' would follow".

 

[charge52]

I just heard Gothic 3 was bad. I read a lot about it and decided I wouldn't like it. It wasn't just the bugs that put me off. Maybe I will reconsider, but I don't know when I would get to it with all the other games I want to play!

They don't have the same design as The Elder Scrolls. The worlds are designed and presented differently and the class and levelling systems emphasize a different kind of experience. Maybe if you take one of the differences in isolation, it might not seem that distinct. But taken as a whole, the exploration and freeform development of the Elder Scrolls is a different experience from those other games. That's part of the reason why the story is presented differently in the Elder Scrolls.

It makes sense to me that someone who doesn't see a distinction between what Skyrim and Gothic are trying to do wouldn't think much of the former. Please do not take that as a criticism. I'm just saying "If you feel like 'x' I suppose 'y' would follow".

You really should get, it's really good, though if you do get the community patch, it fixes some of the bugs that couldn't be fixed(legal issues) and adds an option to make it so you practically have to focus on one particular set of skills.
I mainly meant in the open world dungeons everywhere tons of side quest thing.

 

[SUPA FRANKY]

I want the ultimate fantasy game, with interesting things to see and people to meet, locales to explore, secrets to find and hardships to endure. I wanna game that will be brutal but rewarding.

Improved Combat

Make it so you can shield bash, disarm opponents, and block attacks by turning your blade at a certain angle, and dodge out of the way of attacks as well as use the terrain ( If your being pushed into a wall and you have high athletics, then you could wall run over your opponent). Also, it would be cool if you could damage certain body parts by cutting off someones arm or smashing someones kneecap in with a war hammer. Finally, it would be cool if they had an "Arts" system, where you choose a particular combat style by studying under a master and then you get bonuses for using that style ( The Way of the Dual Wield Swordsmen would get an animation change to fit a unique style, and also get a boost for swiftness of attacks, but at the same time, to get the full benefits, you must adhere to a rule or something ( Maybe never using your swords to kill a women or Not wearing Heavy Armour) Studying under masters net you the ability to use the art, as well as continuous training under the master will increase its effectiveness.

More Weapons and Loot

Skyrim I felt lacked in that regard. it had beautiful items, but a bit to few. They should make the load out set look like this: Helmet, Cuirass, Left Guantlet, Right Gauntlet, Grieves, Pants, 2 Rings, and a Accessory ( Like Capes, Feathers, A Skirt, something to add more flair. They should also make more types of Armour types ( Copper, Gold, stuff like that), as well as make the most powerful Armour types more rare ( You'd only find something Daedric if you REALLY search for it.) Also, more weapon types. Crossbows, Spears, Flails, Maybe Muskets, Chakrams, Battle Staffs.

Magic
They should give magic a more mystic feel. Make it feel like some powerful unstable force rather than another game play type. I want magic to feel like a character could just stick to one School of magic and still be able to kick ass. ( Like an Illusionist can turn invisible, Give People Nightmares, Puppeteer people for a short period of time, Make people go insane or even make people kill themselves. A Destruction Mage can focus on Area of Effect Spells that Destroy the most powerful opponents or he could focus on being a quick shot that incinerate people before they can draw their weapons. A Downside is that the Spells can fail or backfire, as well as producing an opposite effect maybe at random. Rather than just learning better spells later, it would be cool if you could just keep practicing the use of the spell to make it stronger and less likely to fail. This would mean less Fortify XXX bullshit spells that no one uses as well as give people the idea that they are a strange ability. Also, Levitation, Transmuting, as wel as more summons and elements to use ( Water, Earth, Crystals?). Finally, it would be cool if you could enchant items to have particular abilities ( Like A Sword enchanted with Lighting could create a giant blast of thunder. A Flute you enchanted with Sleep will make all the people around you go to sleep.

Leveling

I don't really like Level Scaling, so it would be ok if they put you in the area with lesser creatures, but at the same time you could run into a Level 3000 Daedric Mage that would kill you before you even got close. Hell, you could even make up stories like A powerful monster lurks through these woods at night, don't go out! make the lore centric and antagonist All powerful, while making Normal Bandits and Goblins there too. It would be an awesome feeling after coming so far, and defeating such a powerful opponent rather than just beating everything at level 1.

Quest and Lore, Gameplay, Misc.

Make fewer companions ( Maybe 2-3 in every faction), but improve their AI, and give them their own quests,Personality, Thoughts on particular events that happened in the world or recently, as well as offering ways of improving their abilities. They should each also have a unique voice for them. ( Something akin to Bioware.) They could also be used for team up attacks. ( A companions grasp an enemy, and then you finished it off by cutting your sword through it. So yea, make them more like Vilja.

Also, if a war is to happen, make the battles bigger ( 5 people? Seriously?). Tyranniconn has the righht idea. Also, bigger, Fiercer monster types ( Stuff like Griffins, Hydras, Giant monsters would be cool two. More mount types can also be cool.

Also, they did say the Elder Scrolls we're more a realistic fantasy, but they should really increase the fantasy in the games. Wizards teleporting around the towns, Daedras serving tea and cookies to restaurant customers, A town at the bottom of an ocean, A Tribe of Skooma drinkers with the ability to levitate. Skyrim was epic, but I found it a bit to realistic for a fantasy game.

There should be more in depth factions. The 4 dominating Factions are The Mages Guild, The Fighter's Guild, The Thieves Guild, and the Dark brotherhood. But it would be really cool if you have like sects or mini guilds in each faction ( The Fighters guild could have a sect in some town that are known for hunting down Warlords. Another town might be known for Monster Hunting. In the Mages Guild, there could be a sect that specializes in a particular Spell or have some gimmick that helps them differentiate.

Finally, the AI is for the most part good in towns, but it could be better. It would be nice to see NPCs rushing when it begins to rain, or Laugh when they see something funny. Random attacks on towns would cause all the NPCs to run in terror, and if you help them, they would remeber you. ( Defending a young boy from a Daedra will make him like you, even though fighting the Daedra was never part of a quest.)

So making my dream game would be quite an undertaking. Skyrim still a preety good game though.

 

[SajuukKhar]

as well as make the most powerful Armour types more rare ( You'd only find something Daedric if you REALLY search for it.)

They did do that, in Skyrim you wont find daedric armor in chests until level 46, and even then its nearly 20 times more rare then all other material types, except dragonbone. On top of that daedric armor and weapons are almost never sold in stores.

Bethesda designed Skyrim that way specifically because of how people completed about daedric armor being in the hands of shop owners and bandits in Oblivion.

Make fewer companions ( Maybe 2-3 in every faction), but improve their AI, and give them their own quests,Personality, Thoughts on particular events that happened in the world or recently, as well as offering ways of improving their abilities. They should each also have a unique voice for them. ( Something akin to Bioware.) They could also be used for team up attacks. ( A companions grasp an enemy, and then you finished it off by cutting your sword through it. So yea, make them more like Vilja.

If you have played Dawnguard it is apparent that Bethesda attempted this with Serana, I do hope they use it on future companions in later games.

 

[SUPA FRANKY]

as well as make the most powerful Armour types more rare ( You'd only find something Daedric if you REALLY search for it.)

They did do that, in Skyrim you wont find daedric armor in chests until level 46, and even then its nearly 20 times more rare then all other material types, except dragonbone. On top of that daedric armor and weapons are almost never sold in stores.

Bethesda designed Skyrim that way specifically because of how people completed about daedric armor being in the hands of shop owners and bandits in Oblivion.

Yea, but it just seems like an inevitability to get Daedric Armour. It would be cool if they make certain Armour types so rare and unlikely that maybe 2 in 5 players would find them. It would also be cool if you could recolor you own Armour and add symbols, insignias, or textures on to it.

 

[deathzero021]

i think they should try to make a good game next time.

 

[SajuukKhar]

Yea, but it just seems like an inevitability to get Daedric Armour. It would be cool if they make certain Armour types so rare and unlikely that maybe 2 in 5 players would find them. It would also be cool if you could recolor you own Armour and add symbols, insignias, or textures on to it.

Having things that 80% of the playerbase wont ever find negates the entire point of making it in the first place.

Also recoloring items would be interesting though engine limitations prevent that from happening.

 

[SUPA FRANKY]

Yea, but it just seems like an inevitability to get Daedric Armour. It would be cool if they make certain Armour types so rare and unlikely that maybe 2 in 5 players would find them. It would also be cool if you could recolor you own Armour and add symbols, insignias, or textures on to it.

Having things that 80% of the playerbase wont ever find negates the entire point of making it in the first place.

Also recoloring items would be interesting though engine limitations prevent that from happening.

Yea, but that's the thing, they are rare items. A plate made of a precious metal or Armour from a demon realm should not be easy to find. You can play the game without them, but making an item piece so rare gives it this Legendary Special quality to them. In Morrowind, sometimes there would only be a few Daedric pieces in the entire game! Lets go back to that! Wouldn't be cool if you were talking to a friend and said " So while I was out adventuring, one of the bandits I fought mentioned a city with A treasure vault with A Daedric helm in it! I'm sure gonna follow that lead! I feel that would give the game a better reason to explore as well as more wonder.

Also,they really need to switch to a new engine.

 

[Orphillius]

I think what I want to see the most is vastly improved AI. People responding differently across different situations, based on things like their opinion of you. That's one big step back I think Skyrim made: getting rid of the speech system Oblivion had. The minigame was a little shitty, but at least I could piss people off or chat them up to get a better trade. NPC interactions in Skyrim just felt kind of empty once I realized that they would respond the same to any character.
It's unfortunate that it's hard to get a variety of vocal responses because of the need for voice actors.
The biggest step forward from Oblivion for me was definitely the free-form leveling. I had some trouble getting into Fallout after playing Skyrim because the leveling is just so rigid. I don't even have to sneak to become a pro at it, I just need to dump all my points into it.

 

[Cerrax]

Complicate it back up. Skyrim was dumbed down too much.

I want to create spells.
I want races to have meaning beyond a palette swap.
I want a more interesting level mechanic than vanilla levels/ perk.

As for dragons, they were so poorly implemented that it doesn't matter to me if I never see them again. Sorry, but 100 generic dragon battles is not my idea of fun. If an Ancient dragon is essentially identical in all respects but HP as a Blood Dragon - that is just lazy programming. The mark was sure missed there.

As a storyline, there's enough Daedric lore for the writers to muddle there way into some kind of "lone hero saves the world" story.

this

dragons never really caught my interest. in fact, the main reason i enjoyed Skyrim so much MORE than Oblivion was because of the werewolves. and i'd LOVE to see them take that supernatural-racial-tension further in a future Elder Scrolls game/DLC (hey if Vampires can get a whole "save the world" sub-plot in Skyrim then SO CAN WERES DAMNIT!) i always felt throughout playing Oblivion and Skyrim that that area was never really explored to its fullest potential. if i'm a wussy Vampire i wanna have a full quest thing for it and be able to go out and get blood-cattle and stuff. if i'm a werewolf (and i will be every time) i wanna be able to go on hunts with my "pack". dodge hunters in towns and stuff. they could play around with it and give it a lot of depth and fun. (hell even ADD a Vamp/Were hunter faction so those people who don't wanna be either have something extra to do)

i play a Kahjiit, always have, and unless a more canid species crops up, i always will. but nothing really ever made me FEEL like i was __RACE__ in Skyrim. hardly any responses or comments were made. which was a step back from Oblivion where guards actually NOTICED your race. and the level system was kinda bland. in both the games (i'm only running off of Oblivion and Skyrim knowledge. i never played Morrowind. the later games ruined it for me by spoiling me with better mechanics and graphics)

multiplayer would be cool, but with the Elder Scrolls Online coming out i think it's unnecessary and redundant.
i WOULD however like to see some advancements made in combat. Skyrim did great by adding those Execution animations. but i'd really like to see more added to that. like when you climb onto the Dragons head to kill it, i'd like you to be able to do that on a whim (not necessarily a dragon either. giants too) jump onto and grab/grapple your opponents. throw smaller ones to the ground/into walls or spikes. climb over large enemies like Dragons Dogma or Shadow of the Collosus. basically turn that animation into something you can control. it'd likely be forced 3rd person, but it'd be interesting to see a take on that from a first-person angle as well. (minor gripe about 3rd person, but sneaking around dosn't look quite right in 3rd person. even if it's just aesthetic an ability to take "cover" behind a wall would be nice. (i say "cover" in quotes because you likely won't ever attack from it.))

Bethesda has a great game series going for it. an intricate and interesting world and a near infinite number of directions to take it. their graphics have reached the point where improvement isn't really necessary, just a little touching up to get rid of bugs and clipping and stuff. their mechanics work great (though get rid of the Skyrim/Fallout lockpicking thing. it takes a lot of luck and not real player skill like Oblivions. sure it was annoying but i could pick a Vhard lock at super-low Lockpicking skill with 1 pick because i had good timing. this one... requires a lot of luck and guesswork.) and they have a dedicated fanbase. now that they don't have to worry about making it "look amazing" because they have all the stuff for it already, we should see the series swell with more story and content. more stuff to actually DO rather than prettier things to look at and spill blood on.

also the moving stuff around your house to decorate it has always been a pain in the ass. that really needs some work done on it. like the ability to enter a "mode" or something where the controls are JUST for moving stuff around. (think Halo Forge mode) it's at the point where i just pick up all the food and plats and crap off the desks and put them in a cupboard. it's gonna end up on the floor anyway. then i won't be able to put it back.

sorry about the WALL of text. The Elder Scrolls is one of my favourite games and i usually have a lot to say.

Sounds like you need to play Morrowind. Most of your gripes are not present in Morrowind. It's bigger, with many more options, quests, and overall variety. Honestly, Morrowind is still my favorite Elder Scrolls. Skyrim is a distant second and Oblivion was just a joke. However, even Oblivion is a huge step above most games.

 

[WillieDaKid3]

To everyone saying that Skyrim was "dumbed down," I say to chill out. Yes Skyrim was more streamlined than Oblivion, which was more streamlined than Morrowind.

But come on, calling Skyrim a casual game, just because it's not freakin' Baldur's Gate - bad interface and all - doesn't mean it isn't more complicated than 90 percent of RPGs on the market today.

Think about all of the systems simultaneously at play in any given Bethesda Game,and then compare it to something like Mass Effect, or Deus Ex: Human Revolution, or Kingdoms of Amalur (all good games, by the way) and you'll soon realize that bitching about each new Bethesda game's gameplay changes as "casual" - like it's Peggle or something - is just plain ignorant.

Seriously, if you can name me three role-playing games released last year that were more complicated than Skyrim, I'll be seriously impressed.

End rant.