Well, if at some point in the future, I were to meet someone I was madly enough in love with to want to spend the rest of my life with them, we would be able to go get married.
my thoughts exactly.Jamboxdotcom said:precisely not at all. wait, i mean "Oh god, won't someone think of the children!?" /rolleyes
Awwww, come on. I was being joking hyperbolic. I know that with hard work, skill, and dedication practically anyone can live a successful life. I was just going along with the fact that it life can be easier for you when you're in the right place at the right time and know the right people. I don't know if Woodsey was joking, but I certainly was.The Long Road said:Actually, that's just the crap graffitied over "next to whatever comparatively lousy socioeconomic mess you came from" by deluded misanthropes such as yourself.Irony said:Don't forget "born into the right family" and "have the right religion and beliefs"!Woodsey said:It wouldn't in the slightest.
I mean, we have "civil partnerships" over here, which are basically marriages, but if they did call them marriages it would just mean, oh I don't know, the elimination of discrimination.
As for America (am I correct in thinking some States allow it, or not?), it seems everyone gave it the tagline 'the land of opportunity' and forgot the suffix, 'as long as you're white, male and straight'.
Yep. It'd be nice if politicians would finally get around to ending this charade.MasochisticMuse said:The whole point of the argument is that there's only one answer - it wouldn't affect your life. Gay people are already dating and moving in together and making life-long commitments to each other, so giving them the title of "marriage" isn't going to change day-to-day life at all.
Do you not see the flaw in that logic?[footnote]I'm apologizing for my agro tone now because I'm unsure if you were truly making a point or just playing devil's advocate [/footnote]What you're saying is because some one can object to it, that it's ok to object to it? All those things you listed are bad for society in a provable way. We used to have a lower legal drinking age, but then we realized that kids aren't responsible with alcohol. Men could beat their wives before we realized that females are people too. I can tell you that a pedestrian is going to worry about traffic speeds if some one close to them who does drive gets killed by some one that drove too fast.Kingsman said:Can I ask what the point of posting in this topic is if you're just going to say the exact same thing as everyone else? Just look at all the answers on the first page. Good grief. You'd think that one guy had ten accounts or something.
Might as well drop the controversy bomb here and make a different post:
You ask what gay marriage being legalized would do to affect my life.
Can I ask what eliminating the drinking age would do to affect your life if you were over 21?
Can I ask what eliminating all the drug bans would do if you don't take any of them?
Can I ask what legalizing abuse of females would do if you're a male?
Can I ask what abolishing the speed limit would do if you had no license, or walked/biked/etc. to work instead?
Can I ask what making meat illegal would do if you were already a vegetarian?
Can I ask what legalizing pedophilia and child abuse would do to you if you were an adult?
If you say "nothing" to all of the above but STILL found the concepts more than objectionable, you now know that just because homosexuality does NOT affect heterosexuals, does not mean they cannot find it against their own ethics/morals/opinions/whatever.
Not only that, but if you are in a hetero marriage and think that gay people being able to marriage will negatively affect your marriage, your marriage can't be all that good then, can it?MasochisticMuse said:The whole point of the argument is that there's only one answer - it wouldn't affect your life. Gay people are already dating and moving in together and making life-long commitments to each other, so giving them the title of "marriage" isn't going to change day-to-day life at all.