Human augmentation.

Recommended Videos

redeemer09

New member
Jan 19, 2009
202
0
0
ChildofGallifrey said:
Drenaje1 said:
Personally, I'm in favor of such augmentations, so long as they're not designed with some kind of offensive ability in mind. Such augmentations offer so much to us, specifically, replacing limbs or damaged/useless organs. Of course, if we start doing that then we might run into a situation where people might be living forever, meaning there wouldn't be enough space for as many people anymore. Although, we might even do away with the need to consume foodstuffs, just have little nanites manufacture the required nutrients, but still, we can't just continue building cities and raping the the land for resources, otherwise we'll have a dying planet on our hands.

Oi. Well, it'll still be a while before we see anything even remotely like this, but I'm generally supportive of the idea, so long as we can solve the problems that would come with it.
Hey, if this game proves correct we're less than 2 decades out! I agree with the rest of what you said though.

I would definitely be all for augs that compliment our natural abilities. Can you imagine how much more exciting sports would be? Imagine American football with all the players outfitted with speed and agility enhancing augs! Think about the kind of amazing passes quarterbacks could pull off with some sort of retinal booster. Hell, with a sort of hardiness boosting aug (for want of a better term) we could very nearly cut out sports related injuries.

Of course, that's just me thinking superficially. It would have all sorts of practical applications as well. Isn't that pretty much the beginning of the game? Jensen is fatally wounded but is held over by getting augmented? The medical field would be completely revolutionized.
actually the game inst that far off right now scientist (and company's)are working to develop augemntions and to comercialize it in the next decade
 

Saelune

Trump put kids in cages!
Legacy
Mar 8, 2011
8,411
16
23
I dont think there is much sanctity to our bodies. My only worry with body augmenting is the effects of these people with this power. Im no athlete, but I know I would feel cheated if I lost a race simply because I did not have robot legs.

Also, I would not want to be murdered by some guy's buzzsawhands.
 

DeadlyYellow

New member
Jun 18, 2008
5,141
0
0
Better question: Do you honestly expect the rest of humanity to use them responsibly?

I'll say no, for myself or any other.
 

Erana

New member
Feb 28, 2008
8,010
0
0
The notion of us extending our will to the degree that we can so greatly advance an individuals' physical state in such a short time is a beautiful notion in and of itself. The totality of human thought impressed upon the existing world, sister to the digital world that we would create ourselves.

My biggest worry is what inevitably drives this research- war and corporate greed. They will permeate and taint this effort, though to what degree, we cannot yet know.

Of course, to end the corruption of such an art, we would have to cease being human.
 

Enfid

New member
Jan 1, 2009
38
0
0
I feel the scenario in Deus Ex has the main problem of needing a drug so the body doesn't reject the implant. Needing a drug to do something is generally bad. If a drug is not needed, but the thing about the bionics sending info back to government or what have you (IIRC from the trailer), I think we have similar concern about the way we use our mobile/internet/tablet anyway. It's not something new.
 

Dimitriov

The end is nigh.
May 24, 2010
1,215
0
0
Power, strength, speed, ability... these things should be earned not given. A person ought to make themselves the best they can without resorting to mechanical crutches.

Driving a car faster than an Olympic sprinter can run isn't impressive, and let's hope we never get to the point where we can't run anymore without machines.

To me it just seems like a pathetic sign of weakness to unnecessarily augment your body with technology.




Edit: I am all for helping crippled and injured people regain their lives, that seems quite different than trying to change what is normal for a human.
 

Halceon

New member
Jan 31, 2009
820
0
0
Full and complete support. Of course I wouldn't opt for a clunky mechanism with a power cord dangling from my ass. Now artificial increased efficiency blood cells are something I'd invest in. Also, sensors for every stat in my body that would link to my augmented reality glasses.

Phlakes said:
I'd be fine with it if they were really expensive but free to people who need them. Or at least people who are handicapped. We basically have it with prosthetics and pacemakers and that shit anyway, but for ones that could improve a perfectly healthy person, those would need to be regulated.
So... what about prosthetics that are issued to the injured, but effectively make the person mor capable than the average human? Because we're not far from that point. Heck, we've got people with missing legs being disqualified from the paralympics, because their prosthetics let them run faster than the average non-disabled guy.
 

TheLoneBeet

New member
Feb 15, 2011
536
0
0
I'll cross that bridge if I'm still alive when we come to it. It's one of those things I just don't want to worry about until it's at the doorstep.
 

A Shadows Age

New member
Mar 30, 2011
165
0
0
Well I think moderation is the key, go full tilt, pure or anything in between. I think it should just depend on the individual who is choosing, Why should others choose for them ? However it should be assumed I am relying on a bias called common sense for judgment... I mean, unless you have a good reason for walking around in public with a Anti-tank missile strapped to your arm and weapon grade lasers for eyes, I would say that it crosses the line.