Humans are cruel, the sooner everyone realises it the sooner we can live more happily.
That animal was food, and frankly skinning it alive is better then being eaten alive, possible quicker. Also factor in the possible chemical protections, so as endorphis (or a equivalent) is being flooded, making it less painful or anything along those lines. It's a tough world, and the reason Humans are on top is because they are smart and cruel.
Now before someone doesn't extrapolate what I'm saying correctly and goes "*snurf snurf* omg d00d you support animal cruelty? like omg u doucher *snurf snurf*" I'd like to add that they were destined for death since birth, and although the way they die can be decided you also have to factor the OTHER possible deaths, and also remembering that the animals sole purpose is food, so if you do something to make the food "better" then surely it's worth it. Non food animals though (pets, strays, wild animals) if they are to die make it as humane as possible, Did yeah just shoot a animal? quickly run over and shoot it in the head to put it out of it's misery.
That's my opinion of course, but I'd like to know if the skinning of the animal actually does yield better results. If not then it should be ended. Also I'd like to know why they can't skin it after death? If of course there isn't one then I do not favour it. If so, then the process should be refined. Also keep in mind that my internet is reeeaaally slow today, so I'm guessing as to what it's gonna look like. Also PETA is hypocritcal and fucking retarded, I demand it's demise, or new leadership.
Woa sorry for the long post, well for safe measures against people who do not respect others opinions/thoughts *ACTIVATE SHIELD, FORM OF A REALLY BIG WALL!*
ruh ro, video finnally loaded and it's about skinning, my opinion is invalid as fur is not a nescecitie of life, and thus is not required. @.@
Ruh Ro 2, also like to add now that the video is half way through, that the violence is not needed, and is disturbing and un needed.